Foxo🇺🇸

To support my content - here is my channel (where said content is made). Check it out! Less politics, more stories on there. youtube.com/channel/UC0nrU…

@Gabriella50726 You're welcome!

@FoxOG90 love any cat videos or pics thisd is a good one, ty!

Al Catone, Murder Mittens, 🤣🤣🤣

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide Okay, and that's not a point I'm tryna make. Again, if you don't believe, you don't believe.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide Christian John Adams put it best, "the government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion"

Thanks for proving that embryos are individual members of their species.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide If thats what you believe.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide we are a country without kings, that includes the christ kind. no gods, no masters, only man.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide It really isn't. Christ is King, and yeah racists exist, but they aren't overflowing like the media says they are. I've talked to "extremists" If you mean deporting illegal aliens, that's not racist, its called wanting a secure country.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide one of the few good thing done by devout christians, makes me often wonder how that branch of christianity got replaced by "christ is king get the browns out of my country" christianity that is commonplace today.

@IntrovertApparl Yes.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide Just like how in legal terms it was not child abuse to whip child slaves back in early America, thankfully ended by Abolitionists in 1865.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide murder is a legal term. no one murders a fetus.

Born without legs and arms. Most people would’ve aborted him. He’s not a clump of cells. He’s a human being worthy of life.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide Because that's natural processes, nobody is outwardly murdering it. There's a difference between death by natural causes and intent to kill.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide 4/5ths of fertilized ovum never implant, and are flushed into the sewer. no one bats an eye when those "rights to life" are denied.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide If that's what you think, I don't get engaging with me at all. But it doesn't change the fact that simply being a human being is enough to grant you rights, and the first of those is that of life.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide Sorry, unless you’re born disabled and know what it’s like to live a physically troubled life, your arguments carry zero weight on this matter.

If you’re male, you’re a HE. If you’re female, you’re a SHE. If you think you’re anything else, you’re mentally UNSTABLE. Normalize this in 2026.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide And abortion takes that away from them. Again, as I said earlier, we shouldn't exterminate people because of the way they could possibly be born without knowing it 100%, even if it were 100% we should care for them and develop new and better ways to do just that.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide I agree, should be up to the individual. But it should be a choice they can make.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide And you don't speak for everyone, again this is a choice the individual themselves make. It shouldn't be dictated by others.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide no, preventing those congenital defects from being passed down when preventable is a good thing. nowhere have i advocated for fully formed human beings with said defects to be eliminated. keep in mind, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.

@ChristianHeiens An elevator??? Thx for the push of inspiration to get money.

I’m going to have to start elevator posting again, aren’t I?

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide So eliminating people over traits they cannot control in a scenario they have zero choice in is a good thing?

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide if eliminating congenital disease is eugenics by your definition of the word, then eugenics is good.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide Killing one due to irregular genes is eugenics, its someone choosing to partake in it within a society that supports it. But again, the individual deserves rights, and here in the US, the very first right is that of life. Which everyone deserves to experience.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide "eugenics" is a population level scheme to attempt to direct gene flow. an individual choice is not eugenics.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide It shouldn't because that child conceived is still human and deserves to be cared for. The argument presented here my friend is eugenics, I doubt that was your intent, but by the definition this is it.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide im not advocating for them to be killed, but if their existence could be prevented so in 10 months that family could birth a child without downs, it needs to be an option available to them.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide So people with down syndrome should be killed because others consider them burdens? Apply that to Alzheimer's patients, should they be killed? The solution here is to find new and better ways to care for those people, not kill them.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide a mother having to work until her dying days in her 80s caring for someone with downs syndrome that cant care for themselves in their 50s is, definitionally, a societal burden.

@StevesRawMind @luvmyjaide Its not selfish to want another to have their own choice and live their own life. Its selfish to consider that person a burden that needs to be eliminated.

@FoxOG90 @luvmyjaide so youd rather them make that choice when theyve formed memories, can feel the pain of the process of death, rather than eliminate that suffering and maybe safely let that family bear a child that wont be a burden to them, to society, and to the child itself? thats selfishness.