+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧

29.6K posts

+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧ banner
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧

+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧

@FrDEMeikle

Friend of all who seek the Real, Good True and Beautiful. Restore the Old Faith! Lord Jesus Help me to see the world as You see.

Katılım Temmuz 2009
1.4K Takip Edilen4.9K Takipçiler
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
Thank you! This is exactly the kind of question I welcome, and you are asking it in precisely the right spirit. The Orthodox option is real and I respect it deeply. I have more in common with a serious Orthodox Christian wrestling with the Fathers than with a Catholic-in-name-only who treats the Faith as a lifestyle accessory. That is not a small thing and I want to say it plainly before I say anything else. But here is why it is not my answer. The Orthodox churches, for all their genuine treasures, carry their own significant problems. They are fractured along ethnic and national lines in ways that have produced genuine canonical chaos, as the current rupture between Constantinople and Moscow illustrates. The autocephalous structure that protects them from a papal crisis also leaves them without a mechanism for resolving their own crises. They traded one vulnerability for another. More theologically, the Orthodox rejection of the Filioque, the procession of the Holy Spirit from both Father and Son, is not a minor liturgical preference. It is a substantive doctrinal difference with real consequences for Trinitarian theology. The great Dominican theologian Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange considered it among the most serious divisions in Christendom precisely because of where it leads in the theology of grace. And then there is the question of development. The Orthodox position on doctrinal development tends toward a kind of conciliarism that in practice makes development nearly impossible, which looks like stability until you need the Church to speak clearly on a new question and she cannot. I did not choose the See of Caer-Glow because it is the path of least resistance. I chose it because I believe the Catholic Church, properly understood, the Church of the Fathers, the Councils, Leo XIII and not the committee documents of the 1970s, is what she claims to be. The crisis in Rome does not change the Deposit of Faith. St. Athanasius was excommunicated (in “schism”) and was right. The See of Peter has been occupied by weak, confused, and occasionally wicked men before and the Church survived because her foundation is not the man in white but the promise of Christ. What I am doing, what the See of Caer-Glow is doing among a number of other traditional options, is not creating a new church. It is refusing to pretend that novelty is tradition, that the revolution of the 1960s was organic development, that Teilhard is compatible with Trent. We hold what was always held. We are not leaving the house, we are refusing to let it be renovated into something unrecognizable while calling that fidelity. The Orthodox option is honorable for one born or married into it. But a man does not abandon his father's house because a bad tenant has moved in. If you are baptized West, fight for the West.
English
0
0
1
19
Greg Strong
Greg Strong@strong98223·
I'm sorry but I have to ask... Rather than a new schism, is joining Orthodox Christianity not an option? I'm no expert on these matters but it appears to me that the Orthodox Church has the advantages of the Catholic Church without the disadvantages. I'm not trying to stir the pot; this is a genuine question in good faith. Appreciate your thoughts.
English
1
0
0
35
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
In a world where two leaders have venerated demon goddesses who accept human sacrifice, what's woman's ordination? Folks, it's well past time the material schism, which has existed for 60+ years and in seed form well before that, is addressed with reality, with a formal one. We aren't conclaving our way out of this. Whatever bishops remain who actually believe (20 Doctrinal Councils, in de fide aspect, rejecting all innovation contrary, giving the 21st all the assent that is due (which is not much)) must form an imperfect council name an actually holy and Catholic pope and ask Leo to resign. Will it happen? Not likely without God's direct intervention, but the visible institution is far beyond being able to heal itself. The Fires of Hell will not prevail do not refer to this circus, it refers to the Church instituted by Our Lord, the unbroken apostolic succession faithful de fide. Departure from this separates one from the true Church, not the org that appears on the collection envelope. How do you know which is the True Church? The doctrinal councils, which are immutable in manner de fide. Truth has to come before optic. What does God want? Until He intervenes, there will be great debate, but how few fear the fate of the servant who buried their Talent in the sand of safety over the return of fidelity? The North American martyrs today would be told not to proselytize; St. Philip would be condemned for baptizing the eunuch without OCIA. John Bosco critiqued for having his angel deal with the Waldensians. St James Matamoros for not being synodal. Is there even any need for the nuReligion according to its own doctrine? It's its OWN doctrine? No, if Vatican II was correct and it's spirit, no one has to worry about anything. Just recycle and be nice to migrants.
Lepanto Institute@LepantoInst

Cardinal Hollerich is the Realtor General for the Synod on Synodality. His support for women's ordination should automatically disqualify him from all Church offices, and he should be confined to a cell to do penance for the remainder of his life.

English
9
13
61
1.7K
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧ retweetledi
parks
parks@parkersity_9·
If bartenders can go to jail for over-serving alcohol to someone who then kills another person, judges should go to jail for releasing criminals who do the same.
English
1.6K
20.1K
138.6K
4.8M
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
Do not blame Islam for the dereliction of baptized men, who failed to protect their own civilization and their own daughters. Canterbury, Westminster, and Rome were/are silent at the screams of Telford, Stockport, Nigeria etc. So few stand up and say what needs to be said. So thanks to those who do.
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra

...for decades, they fed us the lie, that diversity is a strength, but what we see today in the streets of Amsterdam, Brussels, London, Paris, Vienna and Berlin, it's not strength, it's civilisational erasure"! @geertwilderspvv full speech 🔥

English
0
2
9
226
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
Love your critics. Those who flatter without sincerity are far more dangerous than those who push back with honest fire. But notice how rare genuine critique actually is. Make someone uncomfortable, and they reach for a pejorative before they reach for an argument. Even the educated mind tends to proof-text rather than reason from Foundation and Telos.
English
1
0
8
130
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧ retweetledi
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
He is one of the more congruent and aware of the Bergoglians. I have always said so. And I suspect his fundraising is more honest. I also suspect that if I were in his living room he'd sound the same as he is on Twitter/x. Can we say the same of a lot of public ecclesial figures? The mess we are in is not b/c of disagreement; it's b/c of BS.
English
0
0
1
43
Chris Jackson
Chris Jackson@BigModernism·
Lewis has unintentionally nailed Trad Inc. Well done!
Chris Jackson tweet media
English
1
14
45
1.4K
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
True. And who got the energy deal? Canada is its own worst enemy. It celebrates optics over the Good of its own people. If you suck the solution is to stop sucking (check your OECD numbers). Not to self-congratulate that your WEF Director Leader with 91% of his personal investments in the US who will never even retire in your own country, is more polite/obsequious. I suspect that Japanese courtesy was for Brookfield's benefit, not Canada's. But we'll know from the numbers. moosechart.com
Mark 🍁@Markfry809

My Prime Minister didn’t insult her with some tasteless Pearl Harbor joke. Instead he impressed her with his ability to speak Japanese.

English
0
0
0
98
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧@FrDEMeikle

Do your own ecclesial leaders share the same Faith and believe in the same deity as you do? Are you sure? On what basis OTHER than shared visible institution do you say this. Consider three leaders of the same Christian institution, in sequence: The first kisses a Koran. This is poor optics at minimum, and sacrilege if performed by a consecrated successor of the Apostles, but it proves nothing about the institution itself. It may be sentimentalism, diplomatic theatre, or simple syncretist confusion. We note it and move on. The second venerates a figure later identified as a demon goddess who, in her own cultic tradition, accepts human sacrifice. This man is, by most accounts, theologically shallow and drawn to dramatic gesture. The same judgment applies, sacrilege for a consecrated person, but potentially explicable as ignorance or naivety. We give him the benefit of the doubt his office no longer seems to demand. The third venerates the same figure. He is not theologically shallow. He holds advanced degrees. He knows the tradition, knows precisely what he is doing and what category of act it represents. The charitable explanation that served for the second leader is no longer available. At what point do three data points become a trajectory? This is the honest question. If we are watching an institution whose consecrated leadership repeatedly performs acts that, in any prior century, would have been classified as apostasy or at minimum grave public sacrilege, we are entitled to ask whether these are personal failings or whether they reveal the telos (trajectory, the destination) of an institution that has been rebuilt around new foundations while retaining the trappings of the old. A religion that few of its own members believe in congruently, with doctrinal seriousness, led by men who perform acts its own tradition has always condemned, moving in a consistent direction across multiple pontificates, at some point the data speaks. Calling that observation anti-Catholic is a category error. It is the most Catholic thing one can do: to hold the Faith above the institution when the institution has departed from the Faith. The shroud tore... Can you be in communion with the Abrahamic Family House and still believe Christ is a True King, and True God?

QME
0
1
1
38
Chris Jackson
Chris Jackson@BigModernism·
Anthony thinks we should be focusing on a kooky old buffoon who defends VCII, Nostra Aetatae, Francis and Leo, and who says the SSPX is in schism instead of paying attention to the fact that Leo knelt and prostrated himself to a demonic pagan idol. This is why he is Catholic Inc., doesn’t get it, and is part of the problem. He said he isn’t scandalized and doesn’t care that Leo worshipped a pagan god. Let that sink in. That means the loss of any Catholic sense. Sensus Fidei. Any true Catholic should be horrified and shouting this news from the rooftops. Anthony shrugs and moves on as if violating the first commandment is no big deal. Then he yells at Nick Cavazos for 45 minutes not to leave the conciliar church with their idol worshipping vicar. Also, I’m not a sede, so he even gets his facts wrong. However, I’m open to the idea. I would like to see the problem of formal apostolicity solved in that regard, first. But since Anthony admitted that the sedes might be right on his last show and that anything he says could be wrong, why should we care what he says about sedes? Or anything else?
English
8
3
26
1.8K
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
Do your own ecclesial leaders share the same Faith and believe in the same deity as you do? Are you sure? On what basis OTHER than shared visible institution do you say this. Consider three leaders of the same Christian institution, in sequence: The first kisses a Koran. This is poor optics at minimum, and sacrilege if performed by a consecrated successor of the Apostles, but it proves nothing about the institution itself. It may be sentimentalism, diplomatic theatre, or simple syncretist confusion. We note it and move on. The second venerates a figure later identified as a demon goddess who, in her own cultic tradition, accepts human sacrifice. This man is, by most accounts, theologically shallow and drawn to dramatic gesture. The same judgment applies, sacrilege for a consecrated person, but potentially explicable as ignorance or naivety. We give him the benefit of the doubt his office no longer seems to demand. The third venerates the same figure. He is not theologically shallow. He holds advanced degrees. He knows the tradition, knows precisely what he is doing and what category of act it represents. The charitable explanation that served for the second leader is no longer available. At what point do three data points become a trajectory? This is the honest question. If we are watching an institution whose consecrated leadership repeatedly performs acts that, in any prior century, would have been classified as apostasy or at minimum grave public sacrilege, we are entitled to ask whether these are personal failings or whether they reveal the telos (trajectory, the destination) of an institution that has been rebuilt around new foundations while retaining the trappings of the old. A religion that few of its own members believe in congruently, with doctrinal seriousness, led by men who perform acts its own tradition has always condemned, moving in a consistent direction across multiple pontificates, at some point the data speaks. Calling that observation anti-Catholic is a category error. It is the most Catholic thing one can do: to hold the Faith above the institution when the institution has departed from the Faith. The shroud tore... Can you be in communion with the Abrahamic Family House and still believe Christ is a True King, and True God?
English
4
7
25
459
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
@chesterbelloc3 At least when you paid for a Medici pope you were sure they believed in the Trinity. Now we have Pachapapa inflation, with less clout. How do you evangelize to this? The ol devil is having a good laugh while the Christian martyrs of Nigeria are ignored.
English
0
0
6
77
Cult MTL
Cult MTL@cultmtl·
Mark Carney leads Pierre Poilievre by 35 points as the best choice for prime minister “The Liberals under Mark Carney are polling at an all-time high.”cultmtl.com/2026/03/mark-c…
English
141
160
844
20.1K
Redivivus
Redivivus@Redivivus144·
@FrDEMeikle Even though I share the sentiment, I don't think it is helpful to encourage people to get more extreme in their heresies. Also, imitating something done in '95 is different from doing it now.
English
1
0
0
55
+D.E. Meikle ❤️‍🔥 ☧
Pray for Leo XIV. But those who have no problem with his public veneration of Pachamama should walk their talk and get one for their house. You can send your crucifix to someone who still believes in their baptism. Reread John 1.
English
2
4
37
550