
NZRF
308 posts



On parle « juste » de bombardements qui ont fait plus de 72.000 morts à Gaza, dont plus de 22.000 enfants et le Liban qui prend le même chemin. Et toujours des sigles et des anglicismes pour déshumaniser : proxy, Hamas, Hezbollah. Tous ces morts étaient-ils des terroristes ? Non.











NYT offers a detailed account of how the U.S. decision to go to war with Iran was taken. A key role was played by Israel, in a meeting on February 11 in which Netanyahu and Mossad chief David Barnea persuaded Trump of the regime change scenario. While the Israeli PM’s role in convincing Trump is incontrovertible, especially after Netanyahu’s visit to Mar a Lago in late December to begin the process of softening Trump up, what comes out of the account is a distinct sense that there was much skepticism among U.S. officials after Netanyahu’s presentation, but that the ultimate decision was Trump’s, despite strong pushback. The CIA’s John Radcliffe called the Israeli regime change scenarios “farcical,” leading Marco Rubio to add, “In other words, it’s bullshit.” JD Vance also expressed grave doubts, and CJC Dan Caine added: “Sir, this is, in my experience, standard operating procedure for the Israelis. They oversell, and their plans are not always well-developed. They know they need us, and that’s why they’re hard-selling.” Only Hegseth was a major supporter of the war. But a distinct impression from the piece is that almost no one was willing to take a strong position against the war. Everyone seemed to be covering his or her ass. While subtly signaling to Trump it was a bad idea, they failed to understand that Trump was not the ideal person to catch subtle signals. We know that Caine likely leaked to major newspapers and outlets the risks of running out of ordnance, but when offered a chance to give a strong yes or no opinion, failed to do so. nytimes.com/2026/04/07/us/…

Le groupe socialiste votera contre la PPL Yadan. Décision prise ce matin à la quasi unanimité.





President Macron scolds the US and Israel for attacking Iran, "The day you say I don't like your regime, I consider you threatening your neighbour so I will intervene and bomb you, you open a Pandora's box" "Iran is a very bad regime, no discussion about that. I disagree with on a lot of topics" "But I don't agree we will fix the situation just by bombings or military operations" "Look at what happened in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya - we never delivered. Never" "You have to respect the sovereignty of people, if people want to change a regime, they can do so" "Having an agenda shared by Korea, France, the other Europeans, Canada, Japan, India, Brazil, Australia, you start having a third way" "Those who don't want to be dependent on China, or aligned by definition, on the US"


















