๐™ฑ๐š›๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐š๐š’๐š•๐šŽ๐šข ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

34.3K posts

๐™ฑ๐š›๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐š๐š’๐š•๐šŽ๐šข ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ banner
๐™ฑ๐š›๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐š๐š’๐š•๐šŽ๐šข ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

๐™ฑ๐š›๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐š๐š’๐š•๐šŽ๐šข ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

@FreeTradeBryan

aka โ€œBryan from Manhattanโ€

Washington, DC Katฤฑlฤฑm Ekim 2012
7.3K Takip Edilen4.1K Takipรงiler
๐™ฑ๐š›๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐š๐š’๐š•๐šŽ๐šข ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweetledi
Phil Magness
Phil Magness@PhilWMagnessยท
Last year I submitted a FOIA request to the US Trade Representative with a simple purpose: to figure out where the Trump admin's infamous "Liberation Day" reciprocal tariff formula came from. This formula, posted on the USTR's website, was the basis of the charts at the April 2025 tariff press conference. It was also mathematically incoherent. Its denominator terms canceled each other out, yielding an nonsensical result that simply spat out an economically meaningless percentage based on bilateral trade volume. The formula became a target of ridicule for good cause, but nobody could explain where it came from. Some speculated that Peter Navarro dreamt it up, likely because it just felt like a crazy and economically incompetent Navarro product. Others suggested that it looked like something hallucinated by ChatGPT. So I submitted the FOIA request in an attempt to find out. My simple request turned into a full year of unexplained delays, stonewalling, missed deadlines that they had previously communicated for delivery, and general non-responsiveness. The USTR, which officially published the formula, is subject to FOIA as a federal agency and does not enjoy the exemptions afforded directly to White House staff. Nonetheless they claimed legal review privileges since the formula's documentation apparently involved correspondence with unnamed White House officials. After a year of waiting, I finally got the answer this morning. The USTR located 31 pages of records pertaining to the "Liberation Day" tariff formula. But it was invoking an exemption from FOIA under a "presidential communications" privilege and therefore denying access to all 31 pages. That said, the email did provide a clue confirming one of my long-held suspicions about the origin of the formula. The specific party they claimed privilege to protect was not Peter Navarro - it was the White House Council of Economic Advisers. This in turn suggests what I have long suspected. The formula either came from or had substantial input from somebody at the CEA, as presumably documented in the 31 pages of excluded correspondence.
Phil Magness tweet media
English
3
32
98
15.5K
๐™ฑ๐š›๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐š๐š’๐š•๐šŽ๐šข ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
โ“Who decides the common good? You are mostly well-meaning people but I don't want ANY of you dorks deciding whether I'm watching The Odyssey or Spider-Man next weekend. DISCLAIMER: I am not a Claremont-briefed member of the New York/Ivy League elite, just a KS dude who listened to 2112 a lot.
Michael Knowles@michaeljknowles

โ€œBut what even is the common good?โ€ Itโ€™s the kind of good that is not diminished when shared. Glad we could clear this up!

English
4
2
32
1.5K
Michael R. Strain
Michael R. Strain@MichaelRStrainยท
โ€œGet your head out of your ass. I would vote for Sarah Palin before this shit.โ€ This is so good. And it would be so much funnier if the DSA wasnโ€™t so horrifying, appalling, and stupid.
English
14
34
304
39.9K
Michael Brendan Dougherty
Michael Brendan Dougherty@michaelbdยท
My mother sent me to a good Catholic elementary school in the 1990s for a little over $1,000 a year. Roughly $2300 in todayโ€™s dollars. The Catholic school near me, offering roughly the same kind of screenless education I had is led by lay people, charges $22,500. The housing inflation since Covid has priced all my peers out of the neighborhood we moved into years ago. itโ€™s so drastic it feels fake but it has real effects on our behavior- we canโ€™t move unless thereโ€™s a similarly disproportionate giant step up in income. But incomes are far far behind housing inflation. Since 2017, average earnings are up about 43%, while home sale prices are up 81% and rents 54%
English
13
10
184
6.3K
Michael Brendan Dougherty
Michael Brendan Dougherty@michaelbdยท
I know iโ€™m going to get โ€œbut your phones and AC and square footage,โ€ but I say this is all backwards. Individual liberty flourishes when we are rich in established common goods. Much of the rage younger people feel has been hard to articulate. But I think itโ€™s their sense that the social treasury previous generations relied on is depleted: neighborhoods where kids played unstructured, large extended families that support each other in family formation, homes that are affordable for 27 year olds, cheap parochial schools staffed by religious, medical care that didnโ€™t require byzantine subsidies, grandparents young enough to help.
David French@DavidAFrench

Yes, this exactly. Plus, in a very real way the common good turn against individual liberty neglects the way in which individal liberty fosters the common good. Free minds and free markets are two of humanity's greatest engines for both moral progress and human prosperity. Free minds and free markets are far more effective than government minds and government control at fostering human flourishing. That doesn't mean there's no role for regulation -- legal limits are necessary -- but the question really is one of defaults, and the American experiment rightly creates a default presumption of liberty over authority.

English
42
83
712
85K