Bryan Fugate
180 posts


@GBUnitedx The problem is the ownership. We need to force GLINEOS out. Until we get better ownership we will continue to struggle.
English

I still can’t believe the fact that Arsenal have had only three managers in the last 21 years while Manchester United have gone through almost 10–12 in that same period.
I mean in the last two decades, they've had Wenger right up until 2018, then Emery for that short spell from 2018 to 2019, and Arteta ever since late 2019 till date.
One thing Arsenal got right was sticking with their managers even during difficult periods instead of changing them every one or two seasons.
That trust is one of the biggest reasons they’ve consistently competed over the last five years and have finally gone on to win the Premier League title this season.
Not only that, they are now in the Champions League final against PSG.
Meanwhile, United have spent years restarting projects over and over again with different managers, different systems and different ideas every few seasons.
This is exactly why we need to trust and fully support one manager until he succeeds instead of constantly starting from scratch again. ❤️👌

English


@B0Y_chester_UTD Our ownership is still consist of the Glazers & INEOS, neither has paid the debt off, they sacked half the workforce. I have no faith in this ownership until we remove them we will not challenge for titles on a regular basis
English

🚨🚨| Manchester United is set to secure a substantial financial boost of approximately £158.85 million with the following breakdown:
- £47.7m from Premier League finishing (3rd place share)
- £33m for Champions League qualification
- £50m from Rasmus Hojlund's transfer to Napoli
- £350k saved in wages by Carlos Casemiro
- £27.8m from Marcus Rashford’s move to Barcelona
This total comes without counting additional income from match-day revenue, TV rights, sponsorship deals, and potential Champions League performance bonuses.
There’s absolutely no excuse for INEOS not to fully support Michael Carrick this summer. They should be leading the charge on potential player signings!

English

@SwedishRumble Swedish Rumble: Have you been keeping a eye on the amount of money that Sir Jim & INEOS are loosing?
English

A negative and a positive.
🔺Hook me up to a lie detector, and I don’t think United will be closer to sign Eliott Anderson than we were to sign Osimehn or Donnarumma last season.
Why? Take everything you think you think you know about wages paid in football and throw it in the bin. Facts are that teams like Liverpool and City have wage bills in the region of £420-430m and United’s £290-300m. Of the three, United pay — by far — the most to non-player personnel. There are no unknown factors and no grey area — the top 10-15 players for City and Liverpool will earn on average 150-200k a year more than United’s players. That is £37.5-50m in the pocket (before taxes) for the player. That is why Donnarumma, Guehi and Semenyo sign for City.
And it is really only very natural. We pay 50m in interest every year, we are not successful on the pitch and we have a costly organization. City pay nothing in interest, is successful on the pitch and have an extremely slimmed organization sharing costs for scouting, medical staff and commercial staff with City Football Group. Surprise surprise they can pay much higher wages than we do.
This has nothing to do with playing in the Champions League or winning titles. Liverpool was in the Europa League recently and still paid the same wages. United’s wage bill will go up — but so will City and Liverpool’s. And while the gap will be significantly smaller — you are effectively betting 20-30m on United being in the CL if you sign for us.
At the bottom line, Elliot Anderson is a fantastic footballer who is a star for England. A bunch of teams will be willing to pay as much for him as they do for just about any other player in the world. We simply do not even remotely pay wages that compete in that bracket.
🔺On the other hand, and this is the positive, — something is a bit off here. Right? Why can’t United pay wages that are like close to what Liverpool pay? The interest payments aren’t that high, we have much higher commercial revenue and higher income from match days.
The only reason is that we are a team that plays in the CL a little less than every other season while they are in it almost every season and goes fairly deep every season.
If — and it’s a big if — we can go from being in the CL like 4 times in 10 years and never going deep to like being in the CL 4 years in a row and making it to like the QFs on average — we can all of a sudden invest a lot more in our squad.
In that position — we simply have a ton of unallocated resources to allocate .
GIF
English

@SwedishRumble The bottom line is the Glazers must be given the ultimate pay off the leverage buyout debt they created or sell the club.
English































