Fungayi Kashaya

654 posts

Fungayi Kashaya

Fungayi Kashaya

@FungayiK

Katılım Şubat 2023
321 Takip Edilen73 Takipçiler
Hopewell Chin’ono
Hopewell Chin’ono@daddyhope·
It turns out that it was not editorial fiction, my brother. Nelson Chamisa did actually give the interview to the Daily News, which recorded it. After I and many others challenged the Daily News, it has now released part of the recording and says it will soon upload the full interview. Ironically, the Daily News actually published only the milder comments from him in the original story. It now turns out that he went much further and directly attacked people by name. In this audio, you can hear him criticising Jameson Timba for leading people against Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3. This is why transparency matters in both journalism and politics. When there is a dispute over what was said, evidence must speak for itself. Now the serious question that anybody opposed to the violation of the Constitution is asking is this: why is Nelson Chamisa attacking people who are fighting against Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3? And why did he go onto his timeline two days ago and claim that the Daily News story was fiction and that he never said those things, when the audio now shows that he actually said far more than what was originally published? The emerging evidence now raises serious credibility and political questions. If he disagreed with those opposing Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3, he had every right to say so openly. But denying the interview entirely, only for recorded audio to emerge later, is what is now deepening public concern and confusion. In politics, credibility matters. Once leaders begin denying things that are later proven to be true, people naturally begin questioning what else they may not be telling the public honestly.
My Energy , My Choice!@mopao_tg

@daddyhope He said it's editorial fiction and also castigated manufacturing of stories. I think in this case he did justice, but only that he didn't use the words we were looking for...Like pa CAB#3 anotaura ka one isu tichida everyday.

English
256
96
452
221.4K
Rutendo Matinyarare
Rutendo Matinyarare@matinyarare·
My brother, my voice was used by Kagame to end war in Congo last year, to promote Ethiopia and fight GMOs in Nigeria. My agenda is not to fight my leaders or captains of industry, but to build brand Zimbabwe as I have done for years. However, it becomes difficult to promote a leadership that pays white Americans $4 million for failing to remove sanctions, but they won’t pay a Zimbabwean and one of the finest communicators in Africa, for successfully removing sanctions and rebranding Zimbabwe. Nevertheless, I have taken heed of your advice and will begin to focus on advancing brand Zimbabwe. I will begin with the below documentary of Manhize that I was holding.
English
45
9
89
13.8K
Hon Zivhu
Hon Zivhu@killerzivhu1·
I spoke at length with my brother, Rutendo, and asked him to stop social-media arguments and avoid attacking President , Wicknell and others ,We agreed in principle, He is brilliant and eloquent. He should use his gifts to promote *Buy Zim and Zim tourism. He’s young, with brains
Hon Zivhu tweet media
English
110
11
97
80.5K
Thabani Mpofu
Thabani Mpofu@adv_fulcrum·
Chamisa is a grown man and must defend himself. However, we are obliged, by honour, to defend the space in which he operates because this is also the space in which we all exist. It is unacceptable for anyone, let alone a publication, to manufacture a story in order to besmirch a person’s name, subject him to scrutiny, and call his reputation into question. It is equally unacceptable for a publication to threaten to release evidence merely to keep its story relevant. If you have the evidence just release it. In any case, Nelson says he has said nothing negative about fellow democratic actors. That is the position that will detain us. Every sane person knows that CAB3 is to be resisted.
Thabani Mpofu tweet media
English
104
232
936
73.1K
kerina mujati
kerina mujati@kerinamujati·
Pretty sure the two planes the only cargo they have is firearms and mercenaries that would sneak into our nation to cause mayhem....he will kill to stay in power.....saka motongoti guided by Costitution inga nguva yaMugabe hatina kuona zvese izvi asi makango takura Mugabe? Muri kutyei pana Emmerson that you are giving him so many chances? Moda kuti vanhu varambe vachipondwa?
English
2
1
24
3.4K
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga
Fellow Zimbabweans,Mnangagwa is executing a coordinated, low-profile return to the Motherland within the next few minutes. This operation mirrors, to the minute and to the metre, the exact tactical strategy he employed during his recent secret departure. Two aircraft are inbound on a synchronised flight path A Boeing 737-7Z5 Business Jet (BBJ), heavily modified for VIP transport, extended range, and secure communications, carrying the President and Zvigananda who departed with him days ago. A secondary heavy-lift cargo jet the same aircraft that handled high-value assets on the outbound leg flying in close formation. This arrival has been timed with precision to exploit known blind spots in radar coverage. No flight plans have been filed publicly. No details have been released. Both aircraft are expected to slide back into national airspace completely unnoticed, just as they left. This is not speculation. This is the reality unfolding as I address you. The same silence that shrouded his exit now cloaks his return. No fanfare. No official motorcade waiting in plain sight. No premature announcements from State House. Only the quiet efficiency of those who understand that in moments of national sensitivity, discretion is the highest form of command.We, the people, and those of us who have worn the uniform in defence of this Republic, continue to watch. The Constitution remains our guiding light. The future of Zimbabwe will not be decided in shadows or private jets, but by the will of her citizens and the laws we swore to uphold.I remain a soldier for the people and for the Constitution. Retired Lieutenant General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga Zimbabwe National Army (Rtd)
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet media
English
43
38
148
27.3K
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga
My fellow Zimbabweans. In life you must take risks, but they must be calculated ones. Do not be pushed by pressure from people around you. Do it at your preferred time, when the ground is firm and the objective is clear. Haste breeds mistakes. Strategy wins wars, not noise. I hear your voices loud and clear, all over Zimbabwe. From the streets of Harare to the villages in Matabeleland, from the farms in Mashonaland to the mines in Midlands the cry is the same. I repeat again hatisikuda kubika mbodza every. We are tired of this endless cycle. People are calling me every day, every hour, asking for the next move, the next step. The pressure is real, but we will not be rushed into reckless action. We do not want Mnangagwa and his Zvigananda to be aware of our plans. Mbavha dzinobatwa dzavarairwa. Let us remain disciplined, united, and silent where it matters. The time will come, but it must be our time – not dictated by emotion or provocation.Stay calm. Stay vigilant. Stay ready. The future belongs to those who prepare in the shadows and strike with precision. Lt Gen (Rtd) Winston Sigauke Mapuranga.
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet mediaRetired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet media
English
17
33
150
19.3K
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga
Comrade President,Power is temporary. That is not a slogan it is a truth written in the blood of many who came before you. I have spent over four decades in uniform defending this nation. I have seen leaders rise and I have seen them fall. Today, I speak as an old soldier who has nothing left to lose except the legacy of the liberation struggle we all sacrificed for. You and your inner circle are not learning anything from history. The dictators you pretend to have corrected made the same fatal mistakes: Idi Amin died in exile, disgraced and forgotten. Kamuzu Banda was removed in humiliation after clinging to power. Robert Mugabe, whom you served for decades, was ousted in the very operation you helped lead, and died a broken man while his family fought over the crumbs. Their grand schemes, their wealth, and their repression could not save them. And now, Mr President, you are marching down the same road as Mobutu Sese Seko of the Democratic Republic of Congo.Mobutu turned his remote village of Gbadolite into a monument of stolen grandeur while his country starved. He built: A hydroelectric dam An international airport capable of landing a Concorde jet Three massive luxurious palaces A modern hospital for himself A school A nuclear bunker Even a luxury church All funded by the plunder of his people’s resources. When his time came, he fled into exile and died in Morocco. Today, those palaces lie in ruins swallowed by the jungle, looted, and abandoned. A fitting tombstone for greed and arrogance. Comrade Mnangagwa, this will be your fate if you continue on this path. You took a solemn oath to protect the Constitution of Zimbabwe, not to mutilate it for personal extension beyond your second term. You swore to serve the people, not to preside over the systematic plunder of taxpayers’ money while ordinary Zimbabweans suffer. The push for CAB3 madness unconstitutional amendments, the endless self-perpetuation, the capture of state institutions these things will not protect you when the inevitable day arrives. No amount of security detail, no hidden wealth, and no constitutional gymnastics will change this eternal truth No man rules forever. As a retired General who helped restore legacy in 2017, I urge you with the full weight of my service Step down with dignity at the end of your term. Hand over power peacefully. Allow the party and the nation to choose new leadership through proper constitutional processes. Do not force Zimbabwe to repeat the painful cycles of the past.The men and women who wore this uniform did not bleed in the bush so that one individual could become a life president. We fought for a Zimbabwe that belongs to all its people.History is watching. The veterans are watching. The young generation is watching. And one day, the same forces that removed others will judge your legacy by how you leave office not by how long you cling to it.Aluta Continua… but not for one man’s throne. Retired Lieutenant General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga. Zimbabwe National Army (Rtd) A Soldier for the People and the Constitution.
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet mediaRetired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet mediaRetired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet mediaRetired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet media
English
15
44
107
19.1K
Fungayi Kashaya
Fungayi Kashaya@FungayiK·
@snowballOfficia Exactly the same thing being done by your boss who was brought to power by General but now he is on a spree to close him out of achieving presidency
English
0
0
0
23
Snowball Tongogara
Snowball Tongogara@snowballOfficia·
It is often said that the people you help the most are the ones who throw the most stones. This paradox reflects a common human tendency: those who receive the greatest support sometimes become the harshest critics. Despite Dr. Tagwirei’s assistance to Rutendo Matinyarare, it is Matinyarare who has been the most vocal in casting criticism. Such behavior is not unusual. Acts of generosity can stir feelings of insecurity, envy, or resentment in the recipient. Instead of gratitude, some individuals respond with hostility, as if to mask their dependence or to reclaim a sense of power. Psychologists explain this pattern through concepts such as projection and ego defense mechanisms. When people feel vulnerable, they may project their discomfort onto the very person who helped them, turning kindness into a perceived threat. Others may fear being indebted or controlled, and so they attack to assert independence. Ultimately, this dynamic reveals more about the critic than the benefactor. It underscores the complexity of human relationships, where help can sometimes breed resentment rather than loyalty. This issue can be framed as a cautionary reflection: supporting others is noble, but one must be prepared for ingratitude, for even kindness can provoke hostility in those who struggle with their own insecurities.
English
11
6
11
6.1K
Rutendo Matinyarare
Rutendo Matinyarare@matinyarare·
𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗔’𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗚𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗚𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗦 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗔 𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗠 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗘𝗫𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗬𝗢𝗡𝗗 𝟮𝟬𝟯𝟬 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗔𝗬 𝗡𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗡𝗗. The argument made by Patrick Chinamasa two days ago suggests that President Mnangagwa has not yet served a full term in office because he has not yet completed three years. As such, Constitutional Amendment Bill 3, which seeks to increase the President’s term by seven years, supposedly does not require a referendum because, according to this interpretation, a Presidential term in Zimbabwe is anything over three years and has no fixed maximum limit. So, if we accept this creative manipulation of the Constitution, what stops the same logic and creativity from being used to prolong President Mnangagwa’s term well beyond 2030, especially considering that nowhere in CAB3 does it explicitly state that President Mnangagwa’s term will be increased by two years until 2030? What CAB3 states is that Presidential and Parliamentary terms will be increased by seven years. So if we follow Chinamasa’s a logic, it means that the day CAB3 is passed, the same people who are manipulating the Constitution can then claim that President Mnangagwa has not yet served “a term” because he has not completed three years in office. As a result, they could once again creatively argue that his new seven-year term only begins once CAB3 is approved and the Constitution is amended. This would mean that his term would now end seven years from that date, which would take us to 2033. And after those seven years are completed in 2033, using the same logic that a term is anything over three years, and seven years — just like the current five years in Section 95 — are not term limit, means President Mnangagwa could continue beyond 2033 because a term is anything more than three years without a maximum limit to the number of years in the term. This is the danger of accepting CAB3 on the basis of Chinamasa and Moyo’s logic the extension of a President’s years in office does not require a referendum because there is allegedly no constitutional limit on the number of years a President may serve within a term.
Rutendo Matinyarare tweet media
English
24
24
44
16.3K
kerina mujati
kerina mujati@kerinamujati·
Poor Sanyatwe will be poisoned in Belarus...ndiko kune ma assasins a Auxillia Mnangagwa. Cdes, do not be too comfortable when you are abroad the Mnangagwa family will eliminate you through these trips.... Musadye kana kumwa kana kugara zvima hotera zvavo make your own arrangements....you would have saved your life, and thank me later.
kerina mujati tweet media
English
12
18
84
20.8K
Victor Mapunga
Victor Mapunga@victor_mapunga·
What is StakeStreet? A mobile platform that lets you issue digital vouchers for global platforms and online services, directly from your phone. StakeStreet is simple: Customer pays → You issue voucher → They access the platform. Become a StakeStreet agent!
Victor Mapunga tweet media
English
6
4
59
244.9K
Fungayi Kashaya
Fungayi Kashaya@FungayiK·
@SajeniMapuranga This is 100% true. Vakuru vakati kurera imbwa nemukaka mangwana inofuma yokuruma. Vakati futi tsitsi dzinotsitsirira
Eesti
0
0
2
315
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga
The appointments changed. The access narrowed. The circle around the presidency contracted to include those whose loyalty was purchased rather than earned. General Chiwenga found himself constitutionally present but institutionally sidelined the Vice President whose chair, as that recent Politburo photograph so eloquently shows, is sometimes simply not at the table. This is the Odinga pattern. Faithfully reproduced. On Zimbabwean soil. A generation later.And just as the Kenyatta family compounded the original betrayal Uhuru turning on William Ruto, a man who had sacrificed his own political future to carry Kenyatta to the presidency we are watching the same logic play out here. Those who help a man to power become, in his mind, the greatest threat to that power. Because they know. They were there. They remember what was promised and what was owed. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ODINGA AND GENERAL CHIWENGA. Here is where I depart from pure historical parallel and speak as a soldier.Jaramogi Oginga Odinga was a civilian politician. When Kenyatta marginalised him, his recourse was limited to opposition politics, public statements, and the court of history. He fought. He was detained. His son inherited the struggle and carried it forward across another half century. General Constantino Chiwenga is not a civilian politician. He is a general. He carries within him the institutional memory and the command authority of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces. He carries the respect of men who wore the uniform across four decades of this nation's history. He carries the moral authority of a man who was offered the crown and declined it not once, but in the most consequential moment this country has experienced since independence. That combination restraint demonstrated under maximum temptation, institutional credibility built across a lifetime of service, and the scar tissue of a man who has seen betrayal up close and survived it is not a weakness. It is the precise qualification that this moment in Zimbabwe's history requires. Odinga's tragedy was that he had no institutional lever when Kenyatta turned on him.Gen Chiwenga has levers. Jaramogi Oginga Odinga deserved the presidency of Kenya. History knows this. Kenya knows this. The continent knows this. He was denied it by the man whose freedom he had chosen over his own advancement. Constantino Chiwenga deserves the presidency of Zimbabwe. Not as a reward for 2017 loyalty should not require payment. But because the qualities he demonstrated in that moment restraint, principle, institutional fidelity, the willingness to subordinate personal ambition to the greater good are precisely the qualities Zimbabwe needs at the helm. Retired Lieutenant General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga.
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet mediaRetired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet media
English
14
23
58
12.2K
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga
History has a habit of repeating itself. Not always in the same country. Not always in the same decade. But the pattern the principled man who steps aside, the beneficiary who then turns on his benefactor is as old as African politics itself. I want to tell you about Jaramogi Oginga Odinga.And then I want to tell you about a room in Harare in November 2017. When the British were preparing to hand Kenya its independence, they faced a problem. Jomo Kenyatta the man the people wanted, the man the movement had built itself around was sitting in detention in Lodwar. Inconvenient. So the colonial administration did what colonial administrations always do they looked for a more manageable alternative. They found Jaramogi Oginga Odinga. Odinga was educated, eloquent, politically sophisticated, and popular. The British offered him the presidency. Think about what that meant the highest office in a newly independent nation, handed to you before the ink on the constitution was dry. He refused.His words have echoed across six decades of African political history "If I accept your offer, I'll be seen as a traitor by my people. The British cannot elect me as a leader for my people. Kenyatta is around, just here in Lodwar release him and let him lead us." Release him. Let him lead. Follow the hierarchy. Follow the will of the people. Kenyatta was released. Kenya became independent. And Jomo Kenyatta became the first President of Kenya the position that history, justice, and the liberation movement had always intended for him. What did Odinga receive in return? Marginalisation. Persecution. A loyalty that was never reciprocated. A man who had declined the presidency out of principle was treated as a threat by the very man he had elevated. His son Raila Odinga would spend the next generation fighting for a Kenya his father helped to birth and being denied its highest office at every turn, including by Uhuru Kenyatta, son of the very Jomo whose freedom Jaramogi had chosen over his own ambition.The Kenyatta family took everything Odinga gave them. And then they took more. Now let me tell you what I know about November 2017. When the Zimbabwe Defence Forces moved to end the capture of the state when General Chiwenga stood before the nation and told Robert Mugabe and his enablers that enough was enough there was a moment that history has not yet fully recorded. Cde Mugabe, in those final negotiations, turned to General Chiwenga. The old man understood power. He understood that the man across the table from him was not merely a General executing a constitutional correction he was a figure of enormous independent authority, liberation war credibility, and institutional respect. And so Mugabe offered him the presidency.I have it on authority that is not rumour. The offer was made. "I prefer you, Constantino." General Chiwenga's response carries the same moral weight as Odinga's words in 1961.He declined. Not because he lacked ambition a man without ambition does not reach the rank of Commander of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces. But because he understood something that smaller men do not that legitimacy is more valuable than position, that hierarchy exists for a reason, and that Zimbabwe in that moment needed an orderly, constitutionally defensible transition not another strongman installing himself by force of arms. "It is Mnangagwa's time," he said, in words that will one day be written into the history of this republic. "Let us follow the hierarchy." He stepped back. He handed the presidency to Emmerson Mnangagwa. He returned Zimbabwe to a constitutional path when he could have taken everything for himself. WHAT HAPPENED NEXT You know what happened next. The man who was given the presidency the man who would not be where he is today without the military intervention that General Chiwenga led and the personal restraint that Gen Chiwenga demonstrated began, methodically and with considerable sophistication, to diminish the very man who made him.
Retired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet mediaRetired Lt General Winston Sigauke Mapuranga tweet media
English
29
46
159
25.7K
Rutendo Matinyarare
Rutendo Matinyarare@matinyarare·
𝗜 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗠𝗬 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗬, 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗦. Muzukuru, the difference between you and me is simple: I don’t live off handouts or backdoor deals. I earn my living. I run an established consultancy—Frontline Strat Consultancy—which has been in existence for 16 years. It has worked with corporations such as McKinsey, Procter & Gamble, and Intel, as well as with the South African government, Rwanda, Nigeria, the African Union, and several other governments across the continent. That consultancy also supports my anti-sanctions civil society organisation, the Zimbabwe Anti-Sanctions Movement, which played a pivotal role in the removal of sanctions on Zimbabwe. You know this very well—so much so that you are on record advising me to go and seek payment from the Ministry of Finance for that work. Why would a former MP urge me to get paid by the Ministry of Finance for something I supposedly did not do? I have never sought business from the Zimbabwean government or from businesspeople in Zimbabwe. It was the President, through his son and advisor Kuda Tagwirei, who approached me and gave me mandates: to win over the ANC to support Zimbabwe in its fight against sanctions, to rehabilitate Kuda’s image, and to help end sanctions. I carried out that work diligently and completed all tasks. I built Kuda’s image to the point where today you are running his presidential campaign—work that rests on the foundation I created when you were too afraid to back up Kuda. I engaged the ANC and secured their support for Zimbabwe’s fight against sanctions hence they even supported Zimbabwe at a time when Mumba had cornered them with the negative SADC report over allegations of election irregularities. I removed sanctions, despite not being fully paid for the anti-sanctions work, despite the lawyers not being fully paid, and despite not being provided with affidavits to counter allegations of corruption and money laundering. I was even instructed not to move too quickly on sanctions removal by the same Kuda. While Kuda paid for his marketing in full, he did not settle the bulk of the anti-sanctions payments (see below), nor did he pay me for handling the Geza matter—despite the risks I took and the fact that I delivered. This does not say taps were closed. It points to a deeper issue: an unscrupulous individual in a position of power who does not honour his obligations, yet has accumulated wealth through deals where he is paid for his work. Even so, I have never pursued him for the money owed. My concern is different—I now feel that I may have been used to fight individuals like Geza and DG Moyo, when emerging information suggests that the allegations against him may, in fact, have substance. You yourself told me that DG Moyo had a docket implicating Kuda, and that you influenced the President to make it disappear. You are also aware of allegations that he attempted to have me assassinated—you confronted him on this yourself. So why are we now expected to treat him as if he is beyond scrutiny? With everything we are now seeing around CAB3, I am forced to confront the possibility that I may have been serving the wrong cause all along. As I have always said, I have recordings of my conversations with Kuda—including discussions about dealing with Geza and his frustration with my silence during the last protest. You often say that anyone who enters politics and aspires to the presidency must be subjected to scrutiny. Kuda has chosen that path. So why do you believe you have the right to interrogate the character of others in politics, yet seek to shield Kuda from the same level of accountability? As for the new sanctions imposed on him after I had removed the ones on the nation,”? This was not because of me failing to do my work but because he failed to provide the necessary information or affidavits to clear his name with the courts and OFAC, while he continues to act in ways that justify OFAC designating him.
Rutendo Matinyarare tweet mediaRutendo Matinyarare tweet media
Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa@TembaMliswa

Sekuru Rutendo is now exhibiting the ultimate danger of waiting upon other men for one's subsistence. When the tap suddenly closes it leaves one frantic, flip-flopping between self-righteous anger and illusions of bringing the whole house down! The wild stories he is now manufacturing, without any evidence but piles of impotent dates and names is acute bitterness at a lucrative client who has suddenly shut the door. Simple. If Sekuru had received the money he demanded he wouldn't be here publicly peddling his bitterness, which he is confusing for some divine flagellation for man's redemption at the hands of evil Pharisees. In fact his, is Judas' 30 silver pieces story without the repentance part but a demand for more! This is not an epiphanic moment of him realizing the truth, meeting facts or receiving Christ and converting into a new life path as he seeks to frame his new self. This is a bottom-barrel effort to justify funding from his new handlers whom he has clearly lied to that he can bring Kuda down for their political expediency. He has to offer something hence the incessant tirades on the same issue and same person, who has not even responded to the wild claims! This is very much in line with the mindset of a man who thinks he personally ended sanctions on the country when the evidence is there that the US had already made decisions long before his ZASM began its activist efforts. The removal of sanctions on Zimbabwe and the transition to sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Program, under which some individuals still remain sanctioned, was in line with the US Treasury’s 2021 Sanctions Review report. The report admitted that due to changes on the global financial architecture "the United States now faces new, emerging challenges to the efficacy of sanctions as a national security tool". These included "cybercriminals; strategic economic competitors; and a workforce and technical infrastructure under pressure from growing financial complexity and competing demands from policymakers, market participants, and others. "To ensure sanctions continue to support U.S. national security objectives, the U.S. government must adapt and modernize the underlying operational architecture by which sanctions are deployed. This report lay the groundwork behind the changes which ultimately led to the removal of sanctions and a transition to the deployment of the Global Magnitsky Program. Sekuru's huge illusion launched its efforts in 2022 long after the US had realized the impotence of sanctions and started processes to remove them. All the gutter drivel to which he has affixed my name isn't even worthy a response when Sekuru can't realise the absurdity of the chain of events where the President gets intelligence reports not from CIO, ZRP or MID but from Temba! Ivhu takatora Sekuru endai munorima musatsamwira mari dzevanhu!

English
41
30
125
62.2K
Rutendo Matinyarare
Rutendo Matinyarare@matinyarare·
𝗠𝗔𝗕𝗜𝗭𝗔 𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗔𝗗𝗩𝗜𝗦𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗠𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗪𝗘𝗡𝗚𝗔 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚. Mabiza, the Attorney General, is frothing at the mouth, trying to force Cabinet members to support an invalid Bill (CAB3) after misadvising President that Cabinet has the authority to initiate a Bill to change the Constitution, when it does not. Despite this monumental failure, she still fails to grasp that no member of government is obliged to implement any command, policy, or directive that is unconstitutional. There is no better way of putting it, but, Mabiza is incompetent, and she is the reason why the nation has been thrust into a constitutional quagmire that now sees a foreign President coming to read the riot act to our President because of her misunderstand the legal formalities governing who can change the Constitution and how it can be changed. As it is, if we had a competent Parliament, it should be requesting the meeting minutes and proposals she presented to the Executive in her attempt to mislead them into changing the Constitution. She clearly misinformed her principal, and now he has egg on his face. But instead of apologising to the nation and seeking guidance from legal minds and consultants on how to remedy her dereliction, she stubbornly chooses to double down and threaten Cabinet and the Executive with dismissal if they do not implement her malfeasance. Where does she as a mere advisor get the gumption to berate her employers and threaten them with dismissal, when she is their subordinate and her role is just to advise the same on legal matters—a role she has woefully failed to fulfil? The woman is not only inept but bellicose and deserves to be dismissed accordingly for leaving the President exposed to the embarrassment and loss of support he is now suffering that has now thrust Chiwenga as a more appealing option for 2028-2033, due to the dead-in-the-water CAB3. Sadly, the tragedy is that she represents the growing conceit and hubris that has crept into President Mnangagwa’s administration, which not so long ago used to be renowned for being a listening Presidency.
Rutendo Matinyarare tweet media
English
69
93
285
60.8K
kerina mujati
kerina mujati@kerinamujati·
Bhurugwa ra Mebho Chinomona on display during Ramaphosa's visit at Precabe😝
kerina mujati tweet media
Filipino
55
37
248
37.1K
Chipo Musarurwa Siziba
Chipo Musarurwa Siziba@ChipoMusarurwaS·
Today at Heroes Acre ZANU-PF supporters cheered Vice President Chiwenga.Loudly. Spontaneously. Sustained.Nobody organised that. Nobody paid for that.Nobody bused those people in..That is the difference between manufactured support and genuine popular recognition. Mnangagwa's team prints T-shirts. Tagwirei hires buses, still the crowd cheers General Chiwenga. You cannot buy what happened at Heroes Acre today. That is called legitimacy.And legitimacy not regional management, not Precabe meetings, not constitutional manipulation Is what makes a president.
Chipo Musarurwa Siziba tweet media
English
17
68
280
37.3K
Rutendo Matinyarare
Rutendo Matinyarare@matinyarare·
𝗜𝗧’𝗦 𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗜𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗖𝗔𝗕𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗧𝗥𝗬 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘’𝗦 𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡. Temba, the sad part about CAB3 is as something incepted by a Cabinet that has not been given power to amend the existing constitution, makes CAB3 and Parliament’s attempt to change it alone with Cabinet, invalid. By the President, the Executive (Cabinet) and Parliament colluding to take it upon themselves to amend the constitution in order to give themselves more time in power, without the authority of the people and outside the powers given to them by the constitution, they have committed treason by trying to usurp the power and authority of people from the people. This is the kind of offense which triggers the military to have to protect the people, the nation and the constitution from internal threats. My assumption is Ramaphosa’s non-official visit to Zimbabwe at a time when South Africa is also allowing its citizens to openly target foreigners, is a warning to our Executive the CAB3 is becoming a threat to the region. We warned you that CAB3 is a national security threat.
Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa@TembaMliswa

This story is dubious. The reality is that Parliamentarians require no additional enticement to endorse CAB3. Who among them would decline an amendment that potentially affords them an extended tenure in office? For many Members of Parliament, the financial burden of elections, often self-funded, looms large. Therefore, the prospect of amendments that prolong their time in office is likely to receive enthusiastic support. Giving them money to sway legislators towards CAB3 is not only redundant but an utter waste. Just like the electorate, lawmakers have grown weary of the electoral cycle, which has become a catalyst for division and turmoil. It is far more prudent to facilitate time for substantive development rather than perpetuate electoral procedures that merely serve to regress us under the pretense of fulfilling obligations. It is important to understand that the paradigms of development are not immutable; they must be tailored to align with the unique aspirations and objectives of each nation. As the President of the Zimbabwe Village Heads Association (ZIVHA), I can attest to the substantial backing CAB3 has in rural communities, which have borne the brunt of electoral violence. Many of those here disparaging the amendments are disconnected from the realities of an electoral season in many local communities.

English
4
23
51
7.4K
Tendai Chirau
Tendai Chirau@TendaiChirau·
If I tell my fellow sadza eaters about this they won’t believe me.
Tendai Chirau tweet media
English
51
14
61
21.7K
President Anti 2030 /Tyora Zvigananda
ED’s path to absolute power involved the targeted assassination of pro-Chiwenga Generals. These veterans were eliminated as "threats" with zero investigation. We must expose these state-sponsored hits to bring closure to the grieving families. The truth won’t stay buried!
President Anti 2030 /Tyora Zvigananda tweet mediaPresident Anti 2030 /Tyora Zvigananda tweet mediaPresident Anti 2030 /Tyora Zvigananda tweet mediaPresident Anti 2030 /Tyora Zvigananda tweet media
English
3
11
22
3.8K
Prof Jonathan Moyo
Prof Jonathan Moyo@ProfJNMoyo·
@kmugova My brother, what then is the purpose of having a Constitution, if its provisions and procedures can be ignored willy nilly? Otherwise, the standard is to do what is reasonable and justifiable in a constitutional democracy. The rest, in my respectful opinion, is alarmist drama!
English
3
12
12
1.7K
Kuda Mugova 🇿🇼
Kuda Mugova 🇿🇼@kmugova·
Should representatives extend their own mandate and that of the head of state without involving those who granted them that mandate in the first place? Take most of the CCC MPs, for example...
Prof Jonathan Moyo@ProfJNMoyo

Professor Lovemore Madhuku in his Own Words Making the Case for Parliament to Indirectly Elect the President as an Electoral College: “We must not put in the Constitution of the country a provision that is dependant on what happens in a political party. That’s the point I’m making. We must never say in our Constitution of Zimbabwe that if a sitting President dies or resigns, we will wait to hear what the political party of that President is saying. No. That is not the best way of running a country. Political parties remain the preserve of those people who are in those political parties. But the country is run on the basis of either an election by the people—direct election—or you have Parliament as an institution sitting as an electoral college. Where parties have influence, they must do the influence within Parliament, but never to allow the political party to sit there to say I’m giving you this President, and so forth. That’s the point I’m making. And on that point, I’m making it right across the world; that’s what they do.” - Professor Madhuku, addressing a “Heal Zimbabwe Trust” public meeting in Harare on 22 February 2020. COMMENT: Professor Lovemore Madhuku’s 2020 remarks make a clear, powerful and enduring case for Clause 3 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B.I. Bill, 2026. This clause replaces the direct election of the President with an indirect election by Parliament sitting jointly as an electoral college; both after every general election and, when necessary, to fill any vacancy in the office of President. The current direct election of the President was first introduced in anticipation of a legislated one-party-one-man rule through Constitution Amendment No. 7, Act 1987 in the old Lancaster Constitution repealed in 2013. Professor Madhuku put it plainly: The Constitution should not—as it currently does— depend on the internal decisions of a political party to select a successor to the President of the country. When a sitting President dies, resigns or is removed, the nation should not have to wait and hear what that President’s political party “is saying.” That is not a constitutionally proper way to run a country. Political parties exist for their own members. The country, however, belongs to all Zimbabweans. The proper solution is straightforward: Parliament—the institution chosen by the people—should act as the electoral college. Inside that open forum, parties may exercise their influence transparently and accountably. No party should ever stand outside the Constitution and simply “give” the nation its next leader. This principle is not abstract. Worldwide, presidential by-elections to fill mid-term vacancies are extremely rare. Most stable presidential systems instead use automatic succession by a deputy or, increasingly, allow the legislature to elect a successor who serves out the remainder of the term. These arrangements place national continuity and stability above partisan interests. Clause 3 of the Bill follows exactly this proven path. By giving Parliament the clear duty to elect the President—whether at the start of a new term or in an unforeseen vacancy—Zimbabwe will secure stronger democratic stability, and keep the highest office firmly within the people’s constitutional framework rather than the private control of any single party. In short, Clause 3 is a mature, practical and principled reform that directly honours Professor Madhuku’s wise 2020 counsel. As such, it deserves the full support of every well-meaning Zimbabwean who values good governance, democratic constitutionalism, institutional integrity and the long-term strength of the country’s democracy in the national interest!

English
2
2
14
11.8K