iSam
5.9K posts

iSam
@FuturealSam
🖖🏻 BitCoinSV . Craig is Satoshi . To no man I kneel, Ours is the kingdom of steel, High and mighty, alone we are kings, Whirlwinds of fire we ride.


THE ORIGINAL VISION OF #BITCOIN IS FINALLY HERE!! For the 99%. It took this long to fight off corporate interests & scale it. It’s the $BSV blockchain. I’m a former FOX TV reporter. I verify everything. No one is paying me to say this. Amazing intvw @thecoastguy!

These posts are going to age terribly 😂 Gold is a placeholder for Bitcoin Nobody uses gold as money because it can't be used as money




My take on BSV right now: Yeah, we're seeing some price movement and Teranode news is exciting. But I think we need to be realistic about the market conditions. The hard truth.. We're still tied to BTC's movements. When BTC corrects, everything follows. That's just how the market works right now. So even with all the actual development happening with BSV, I don't think we'll see the real breakout until 2026. The foundation is being built now. The real run comes later. Just my very personal view. #bsv #bitcoin


1/6 DEV Q&A: We spoke to @deggen, our Distributed Applications Lead about the key to successfully building on BSV. Here's what we learned:

No, I see that only as a misstatement, a lie, or an error on your part. Nodes create blocks. That’s it. Read Section 5 of the White Paper—again, slowly this time. The only nodes are the ones that create blocks. If you’re not creating blocks, you’re not a node. If you’re just validating someone else’s work, passively replaying history without contributing to it, then congratulations—you’re a spectator, not a participant. You’re not part of the network consensus mechanism. You’re irrelevant. Now let’s talk scale. If you actually did the math—real math, not magical thinking—you’d realise that storage and network throughput double roughly every 1.25 years. That’s not a guess; it’s an empirical observation that’s been holding steady for decades. Four doublings in five years. That’s 16x. This isn’t Moore’s Law; it’s faster. So the size of the blockchain isn’t an issue for people building real systems. It’s only an issue for people who fetishise artificial constraints and mistake personal hobby setups for global infrastructure. Bitcoin was built to scale. If your argument is that scaling reduces the number of so-called “nodes,” then good—because only block-producing nodes matter. The rest is noise.



Satoshi's vision will become realized.


