Garrett Gutierrez✝️
30K posts

Garrett Gutierrez✝️
@GGarrett2000
Gary Plauché minarchist. Computer nerd. Cringe but free. Christ is Lord.
Walnut Creek, CA Katılım Haziran 2016
3K Takip Edilen363 Takipçiler

@GGarrett2000 @feraljokes Childish behavior. The behavior of a Redditor. Have some self respect goddamn
English

Nazi account howling mutant has been doxxed. His name is Alex Norden and he lives in NYC decoherence.media/far-right-trol…
English

@BrockRiddickIFB There is no reason for that to be true. The sun's rays should hit them at relatively the same angle, true, but not within your perspective. Consider the below example that shows how balls can be differently shaded with parallel sun rays.

English

@Seeker__Of @BrockRiddickIFB The blue sky is in front of it.
English

@Space_Is_Fake01 Just to be clear, your "experimental proof" are videos of people zooming in on boats. We have thousands of years of science experiments culminating in a model that predicts sunrise/set, eclipses, movement of the stars/planets, etc. You do not even know how far away the sun is.
English

@oodwmwboo @FELibrary_ When you say tesla do you mean Nikola Tesla or Elon Musk Tesla? Either way, no, they did not discover unlimited energy.
English

@GGarrett2000 @FELibrary_ the evidence is everywhere, tesla has use aether to generate unlimited free energy for people to use, yet you choice to ignore it
English

@oodwmwboo @FELibrary_ No, they take the side of no aether because aether is a thing for which there is absolutely no evidence and the movement of the Earth is a thing for which there is substantial evidence.
English

@GGarrett2000 @FELibrary_ The logic is if there was Aether, then the earth is not moving , if the earth is moving, then there is no Aether. Since they don't want to admit the earth is not moving, so they take the side of no Aether.
English

@BrockRiddickIFB But reality can be modelled mathematically. Lies however will defy attempts to model them. This is why globe Earth can be modelled and the flat Earth cannot, for example.
English

@karma44921039 The photo being labeled as being from Artemis II is not a photo that has ever been released by NASA.
English

@FELibrary_ This story is known to be likely fake, or at least to have absolutely no verification of it being true.
leadstories.com/hoax-alert/202…

English
Garrett Gutierrez✝️ retweetledi

What landmass is that?
Asking for a friend 👀

NASA History Office@NASAhistory
"Houston, this is the most spectacular view… you can possibly imagine." –Apollo 16 astronaut Charlie Duke As the Apollo 16 crew began their flight to the Moon on April 16, 1972, they captured this view of North America from their spacecraft. Beginning NASA's fifth lunar landing mission were astronauts John Young, commander; Ken Mattingly, command module pilot; and Charlie Duke, lunar module pilot.
English


@Rolando_tillit @BrockRiddickIFB *I mean burn up upon return from orbit (reentry)
English

@Rolando_tillit @BrockRiddickIFB I looked it up and the Tianzhou 9 is designed to burn up in orbit, not land. But even if it was designed to land, that doesn't mean it is designed to land with an in tact and fueled first stage. The whole point of rocket stages are you get rid of them when they run out of fuel.
English

@Rolando_tillit @BrockRiddickIFB Rockets with multiple stages stage their fuel as well. That means when I say "the first stage ran out of fuel" I mean just the first stage and not the entire rocket.
English

@GGarrett2000 @BrockRiddickIFB No, it's not running out of fuel, it has enough to land. It's running out of efficiency, the atmospheric pressure contains the rocket nozzle and directs the thrust. At high enough altitude, the rocket has exited it's environment, and cannot perform.
English













