Sabitlenmiş Tweet

The Contradictions of Nigerian Governance
Recently, I had a thought-provoking conversation with a friend about the deep-seated contradictions in Nigeria's governance and why the current generation of leaders may be among the most fortunate in the country's history. We explored how citizens often lavish praise on governors for delivering basic infrastructure, such as roads or schools, even when these projects are riddled with opportunities for corruption through inflated contracts and little accountability. More strikingly, there is a widespread lack of expectation that government should meaningfully improve lives.
In reality, most Nigerians shoulder the burden of essential services themselves. They drill boreholes or buy water tankers for household use, run diesel or petrol generators for electricity, forgo health insurance, and pay privately for their children's education. The government's role is minimal, limited to partial subsidies for tertiary education and some agricultural inputs. This low bar allows leaders to operate with scant scrutiny or pressure for real progress. However, one of the most perplexing contradictions we discussed is Nigeria's recent Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with France on tax administration. While the Federal Inland Revenue Service has clarified that this agreement focuses on technical assistance and capacity building, without granting access to individual taxpayer data or digital systems, critics have raised valid concerns about potential implications for data privacy and sovereignty.
I would have preferred to see such diplomatic energy directed toward strategic energy partnerships instead. France, for instance, powers much of its electricity needs, which is around 65-70% in recent years, from nuclear sources, operating 56 reactors across 18 sites to serve its population of about 70 million, despite importing most of its uranium. Nigeria, by contrast, has identified uranium occurrences in states like Cross River, Adamawa, Taraba, Plateau, Bauchi, Kano, and others, though these remain largely unexplored and undeveloped. With genuine commitment to long-term development, one might expect the government to pursue alliances for upgrading our power infrastructure, perhaps even exploring safe, modern nuclear options alongside alternatives like solar and wind to join our current energy supply mix.
This energy shortfall is compounded by another irony: Nigeria's enthusiastic participation in global climate conferences (COPs), where large delegations commit to international agreements on emissions reduction, even as developed nations continue relying on fossil fuels. Nigeria sends substantial teams to these events, often hundreds of delegates, however, shows little urgency in harnessing its own vast fossil fuel reserves for domestic needs. Our proven coal reserves stand at around 379-639 million tonnes, with significant deposits in states like Enugu, Benue, Kogi, Gombe, Nasarawa, and others, largely untapped. Meanwhile, the bulk of our grid electricity, about 80% comes from natural gas-fired plants, supplemented by hydropower, but the overall capacity remains far below demand. This is particularly alarming given projections that Nigeria's population could reach 400 million by 2050, intensifying pressure on an already strained system. Without proactive planning, diversifying sources, improving transmission, and investing in efficiency, the energy crisis will only deepen.
These observations lead to a broader question: Why do leaders seem so detached from building a sustainable future? Perhaps because many are advanced in age and less invested in outcomes they may not live to see. True governance should prioritize the people and the generations to come. Will Nigeria's leadership ever shift toward that vision, one rooted in accountability, foresight, and genuine service? The contradictions we face today suggest it's long overdue.
English


















