Global Unfiltered News

This is the point. Same will happen in all countries that will make social media age restrictions. “Won’t someone think of the children” is usually not about the children

the purpose is not to remove young people from the internet. the purpose is to remove anonymity from the internet in a country where the government routinely punishes dissent with jail. the british caliphate is no longer free.

BREAKING British PM announces ban on social media for under-16s

RECAP: The U.S and Iran managed to get their peace deal across the line, and Israel is already back to bombing southern Lebanon. Netanyahu reportedly refused to agree to stop all military action and withdraw the IDF. Iran is making it clear that it's Trump's responsibility to rein in Israel if they want the initial Memorandum of Understanding to turn into a lasting peace deal. They've now got 60 days to hammer out the finer points of a comprehensive deal, although you can expect that deadline to be extended as they start getting into the weeds. Netanyahu's under increasing pressure from ministers and opposition parties, calling the deal a disaster for Israel. Trump's headed to Geneva for the G7 summit, with protesters already clashing with police and setting fire to cars. Honestly, these days it's hard to tell protesters from sports fans celebrating their team's win. Finally, the UK has banned under-16-year-olds from 10 social media apps, including X, that they have labeled "high-risk." Starmer doesn't want kids finding out what's actually happening in the world and would prefer they get their information from the BBC. Not long now until they have a fully fledged Ministry of Truth. Writer: Ian

I have been asked repeatedly this week whether Lebanon will actually be included in any potential memorandum of understanding between Iran and the United States. My answer remains the same, and it always will. Despite Iran's efforts and genuine intentions to see an end to Israeli terrorism on Lebanese soil, I am a southern Lebanese woman from Khiam. I lived through the reality of occupation, aggression, and war firsthand. I have also spent years studying the history of an entity born from supremacy, colonialism, dispossession, and theft. The more I witness and learn about its genocidal tendencies and terrorism, the less faith I place in any signed document between any two governments that believe they can somehow restrain or control this cancerous project of terrorism. I see no lasting peace emerging from pieces of paper. I see the same pattern that history has shown us for decades: wars, massacres, invasions, and, inevitably, Resistance. If history has taught us anything, it is that no agreement, resolution, or signature ever stopped Zionists from killing, occupying, or stealing. What stopped them were the costs imposed on them. What forced them to retreat was bullets, Katyushas, Kornets, missiles and FPVs... only Resistance. That is why my trust has never been in signed papers. My trust lies in the ability of people to defend themselves, their land, and their dignity. And that is where it will remain.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Flashpoint in the US-Iran deal: The Strait of Hormuz.Trump demands toll-free passage: "I hereby fully authorize the toll free opening of the Strait" Iran says no 'tolls', but will charge 'service fees,' 'security fees,' and 'management fees' while keeping control (possibly with Oman). Either that's a word play to grant Iran a toll without calling it so. Or the deal's clauses aren't as clear on some of these issues. Writer: Oliver