StephanZA

@Thamie2024 Lol, yet neither did anything when America neutralized their allies.

@GamingGrifter China alone is stronger than the US, and Russia alone is stronger than the US

You're stuck in an old world with old world thinking in a world where multipolarity no longer exists. You believed China and Russia was strong enough to face down the US, you bet on the wrong horse and now, instead of correcting your error you double down. Communism has captured you and left you incapable of realistic thought.

She's based. And I'm not aware of songs we ever sung but the old flag is a great example. The courts held that the flag is hate speech because it reminds black people of their painful past. So regardless of intent it's about how people feel. The same rules somehow isn't applied to a song explicitly calling for the death of white people.

The ANC in their zeal to carry the torch for Iran may have just signed it's own death warrant. If the Palestinians have a right to self determine, then so does the Afrikaner, the Zulu and the Khoi-San. Or will the ANC admit that these rules are only meant to punish Israel?

So past evil action from generations ago means you aren't allowed to call out evil ever again?

Cool story. Now do all the Islamic terrorist groups since Mohammed. Let's see if your theory holds up. In 1982 Israel "invaded" Lebanon because for years prior the PLO was using Lebanon as a staging ground to fire rockets into Israel. When the PLO tried to assassinate an Israeli diplomat, Isreal acted. Your history appears to be rather selective.

Terrorists get killed. No decent person is losing sleep over this.

A new US trade probe could put South Africa’s BEE laws under global scrutiny, raising tough questions about fairness, foreign firms, and a sensitive Chinese dimension.  Read the full analysis in The Common Sense. #TheCommonSense #SouthAfrica #BEE #Trade #US #Economy #Investment thecommonsense.co.za/Economics%20%2…

The Iranian regime has made an enemy of all neighbor states. Good times

Lol

@Thedon9994 @JacoS122 @Askwhyisit There is 4 accounts from independant authors that claim they saw or authored on behalf of people who saw the resurrection. That is evidence. You'd have to prove they were all lying if you wish to ignore their accounts.

@JacoS122 @GamingGrifter @Askwhyisit WTF? There is zero contemporary, independent evidence that anyone actually saw a resurrection. Hope this correct your error

Jesus didn’t exist. Even if he did, he didn’t perform any miracles.

The Bible is a collection of individual books written by people who claim to be eye witnesses to an event that occurred 2000 years ago. The event involved a man referenced by sources outside the Bible. Investigations into the Bible show little evidence of collusion and from a historical perspective provides us with more evidence for the events and the existence of Jesus than most other personalities of that time. Personalities that you, today, wouldn't question. Like for example Alexander the Great whose life was only recorded 700 years after his death or Mohammed's existence for whom the first sources are only found to start a 150 years after his death. Suspicion of evidence isn't evidence in itself. In order for you to claim the events did not occur it's not enough to say "well this couldn't have happened" or to claim "well it's all found in one book therefore it can't be true". By employing the above logic you are effectively saying that any book of the comprehensive history of Europe is false because all those events are recorded in a single book and therefore using the book to argue for the events is invalid. Each book in the Bible is written by a specific author, this means each book is in itself an independent source of information, unless you can show that the author merely copied from another author. This means you'd have to refute each source individually. Something that many atheist scholars have tried to do for centuries and as of yet has not been successful at. Your own evidence rests on a screenshot filled with a collection of claims, claims with zero sources attached and vague references like "many scholars now believe". Who are these scholars, how many is many? 2 random dudes? A 100 highly respected scholars? The majority? No! Your claims are suspiciously vague and still lacks even the most basic threshold for actionable evidence.

@GamingGrifter @Askwhyisit 'Sources' he says...

Leader of the ANC and complete idiot, Fikile Mbalula, says: - They thought the US would kidnap Ramaphosa. - The American ambassador was drunk in his recent public appearance. - The Israeli ambassador was deported after appearing drunk. Fikile is an unhinged moron and completely unfit for a leadership position. Remove him immediately!

Iran shuts off the internet so as to supress the people and kill at will their own citizens. Starlink provides a small avenue to allow the world to see the truth. African Marxists praise the regime for killing their own citizens in darkness.

The Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) wants to reiterate that the ANC has to stop placing ideology above economic reality and national interest. South Africa cannot continue down this path of economic suicide for the sake of maintaining a failed foreign policy. @MulderCorn vfplus.org.za/latest-news/us…

Asmon as based as ever.

It's racist now to point out the fact that the Taxi mafia exist. Even though we all know they exist. What's revealing is that you believe the way the taxi industry behaves is indicative of how all black people behave and therefor criticising taxi bosses is criticising black people.

So because historically governments and presidents failed to uproot evil regimes we must simply never try again? Essentially what you're saying is, governments should stop putting murderers in jail because they've done so in the past and there's still murderers around today. In other words, past failure must dictate present and future inaction.

@honestlythnking @nakedpastor For a deceptive heart in reading we are given the church, to test us and hold us to truth. Let me ask you a simple question. If love is your ultimate guide, is being gay a sin?

@GamingGrifter @nakedpastor Where does the OP ever suggest excluding the Bible? It’s still very much a part of the process. And what’s to say a deceptive heart won’t negatively affect your reading scripture to begin with? Perhaps a transformed heart by the love of Christ is the better place to start.

Many of my theologian friends think this is one of my best cartoons. I suppose it's because it illustrates that we interpret scripture through our own fears and fantasies so that they confirm our preconceptions and magically mirror what we already believe. Confirmation bias.

@Askwhyisit Let's think about your position and ask the same. Can you prove in a court that Jesus did not exist? I'll note, my case has way more evidence than yours.

Think about the post below and ask yourself if any of that would hold up in a court proceeding intended to prove the existence of Jesus.