🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱

2.3K posts

🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 banner
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱

🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱

@Ganbin1

🌱 #Chia Lover / Farmer / Builder 🌱 Core Contributor @dexie_space #4D #Javascript #Typescript #React Developer https://t.co/M9TlcwJk9s $XCH

Katılım Nisan 2015
2.2K Takip Edilen926 Takipçiler
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 retweetledi
Mr. Dennis🌱
Mr. Dennis🌱@MrDennisV·
The protocol: 1️⃣ Alice encrypts + shuffles 52 cards → sends to Bob 2️⃣ Bob re-encrypts + shuffles again → double-locked deck 3️⃣ To deal: each player removes only their lock 4️⃣ Only the recipient sees the card — the other can't No server. No referee. Just cryptography.
Mr. Dennis🌱 tweet media
English
2
15
53
2K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱
@Art0fLife_ And this is where the community should be there to help victims to move from one vibration to another. Else we just fail the humanity test.
English
0
0
2
267
Art of Life 🦋
Art of Life 🦋@Art0fLife_·
He literally explains why the universe doesn’t reward victims (even when you’re right)
English
90
1.8K
8.3K
296K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱@Ganbin1·
@PowerHasheur Aujourd’hui c’est le 5ieme anniversaire de @chia_project Peut-être est-ce le temps pour le monde de reconnaître cette technologie pensée par un génie pour qui le summum du divertissement c’est de résoudre des puzzle complexe et qui a inventé BitTorrent au passage. 🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱
Français
1
0
2
49
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 retweetledi
🖐️ / 🌱
🖐️ / 🌱@dobetter26·
I was looking over some notes, a little searching for my next troll and stumbled upon this by @DracattusDev Somehow I missed this when it was written in November: @dracattusdev/chia-bitcoin-2-0-for-the-cypherpunk-generation-f7c8ccff747b" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@dracattusdev/…
English
1
9
16
1.3K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 retweetledi
🌱Drac 🍊➕
🌱Drac 🍊➕@DracattusDev·
I just published "Koba42 Is Building the Future of P2P Gaming on Chia — And It’s in Closed Beta Now" medium.com/p/koba42-is-bu…
🌱Drac 🍊➕ tweet media
English
5
35
73
5K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 retweetledi
Gene Hoffman hoffmang.xch 🌱
It's never easy waiting for real things to get done, but for once, you won't be the yield. There is a adoption coming because the product is better - not because of some hype or meme...
English
4
32
119
3.4K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 retweetledi
Gene Hoffman hoffmang.xch 🌱
The only narrative truly left for crypto is that real blockchains will bring real assets on chain. To succeed at that, there has to be something materially better about those assets to get people to switch. We're doing that @chia_project
English
6
100
243
8.4K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱 retweetledi
minzirillo 🇨🇭🌱
minzirillo 🇨🇭🌱@minzirillo·
Yes, Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work (PoW) is indeed a deeply entropic system: it injects real entropy into the chain through energy consumption (electricity → heat → dissipation), creating a physical, costly, and hard-to-fake barrier. This is one of the main reasons many consider it particularly robust against future threats such as massive AI attacks or ultra-powerful centralized actors. But Chia's Proof of Space and Time (PoST) is an excellent alternative that aims to preserve most of these properties while being much less energy-intensive (often cited as 100–500× less than Bitcoin, depending on estimates and network size). Here's a clear side-by-side comparison: Shared strengths (common advantages) - Both are Nakamoto-style mechanisms (longest-chain, lottery-based). - They tie security to a real-world physical/scarse resource → strong Sybil resistance. - They remain permissionless: anyone can participate without approval or registration. - No slashing, no need to be permanently online to validate (unlike many PoS designs). - They generate entropy through a process that is hard to simulate or cheat without real cost: - PoW → entropy via hash computation (thermal noise). - PoST → entropy via pre-computed storage (plots) + VDF (sequential Proof of Time). On entropy + decentralization as essential ingredients These two elements are crucial for long-term sustainable security, especially against a future dominated by powerful AI that could break purely software-based crypto. - PoW excels at pure entropy (dissipated energy = thermodynamic proof). - PoST (with VDF) comes very close: the VDF enforces an incompressible sequential delay (temporal entropy), and space provides physical distribution. Many people (including Bram Cohen) view PoST as a kind of PoW 2.0: same cypherpunk spirit, but without the massive energy waste. Criticisms remain, though: some recent papers (2025) show that pure PoSpace (without VDF) is vulnerable to forking attacks under dynamic availability; Chia largely avoids this thanks to Proof of Time. PoW remains the gold standard for raw physical security today. PoST is a very serious upgrade in terms of efficiency + accessibility without sacrificing (almost) any entropy/decentralization. If the goal is an asset resistant to an AI-dominated future, both approaches make sense — PoW for its thermodynamic simplicity, PoST for its pragmatism.
English
0
1
2
95
⛏️ MT 🤖
⛏️ MT 🤖@digdotnet·
**2022** - Chia needs an application and NFT persistence layer - Chia DataLayer could be that layer - Chia DataLayer needs an incentive layer **Early 2023** - To build an incentive layer, Chia DataLayer needs an infrastructure base - DIG Network will be that infrastructure base **2023 - 2024** - Building out the DIG Network infrastructure base **Late 2025** - The infrastructure base needs to be anchored to Chia, and this requires state - Singleton concurrency limits this at scale - DIG needs to roll up state onto Chia - Trustless state rollup needs its own consensus - A separate block set makes sense to help with this - Now there's a clunky L2 that rolls up DIG state - DIG could have written state to Chia directly but it would require far too many state updates **Late 2025 into Early 2026** - The L2 works, but the real realization is that DIG just needs cheap TPS on Chia - The L2 needs a block format - It would be great to support CLVM and the coinset model - Turns out, it can - Now there's a near-working Chia-parity sidechain with faster TPS and L1 hard finality, where any puzzle on Chia should work on the sidechain too - Given the compatibility, how hard would it be to build bridging directly into consensus? - Turns out, that might actually work - DIG, XCH.B, and cXCH.B are close to working on this L2 - This is great infrastructure for DIG, with the ability to support DataLayer directly in the full node **Now** - Getting close to a high TPS sidechain with native DataLayer support. This could actually be a true application layer for Chia.
English
4
18
69
2.7K
🌱 Madderhat.xch 🌱
🌱 Madderhat.xch 🌱@_MadderHat·
When the CEO thinks a community project is cool and decides he needs it to run on his Mac and spends all weekend working on it ...
🌱 Madderhat.xch 🌱 tweet media
English
5
15
64
2.3K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱@Ganbin1·
@tether Cool. Who create the blocks when pooling? The miners, not the pool operators of course?
English
0
0
2
512
Tether
Tether@tether·
⛏️ Bitcoin Mining is complex. ️⚡ Mining OS by Tether (MOS) makes it simple. Introducing MOS — the open-source operating system for real mining infrastructure. Modular. Scalable. Built for energy + hardware + data. Explore the Documentation: mos.tether.io Join our Discord and ask questions discord.com/invite/tetherd…
English
64
212
1.3K
293.9K
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱
🌱 Ganbin.xch 🌱@Ganbin1·
@bramcohen Let’s get SEC approved and make Chia an official ownership public registry with real ownership and DeFi compatibilities.
English
0
0
2
188
Bram Cohen🌱
Bram Cohen🌱@bramcohen·
Normal, sane regulation of crypto may be bad for the industry as a whole but it's good for Chia. We've designed it to be truly decentralized, anti-MEV, and all around legal from the very beginning.
English
24
87
239
10.1K