Gherm

370 posts

Gherm

Gherm

@GhrestryRoad

Katılım Mart 2026
72 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
🇸🇪
🇸🇪@SwedeStats·
Kim Hellberg showed up in the stands behind John Guidetti who is in the studio after the game between Hammarby and Malmö FF.
🇸🇪 tweet media
English
7
14
404
224.7K
Phil Boro (Energy and Life)
To all the Saints fans saying Boro aren’t good enough to go up, have a little read. Don’t cry.
Phil Boro (Energy and Life) tweet mediaPhil Boro (Energy and Life) tweet media
English
66
0
42
20.1K
Balham Matt
Balham Matt@IamBalhamMatt·
@pjcboro @Biggun26_ @AllenForSur3 We’re a bigger club than Boro with a much more significant identity. 11 years in the Premier League. 4 in the top 8. Half the defence of a European international champion in Portugal. Fastest goal, fastest hatrick, 27 wins against big six opposition, world class academy. Lol bro
English
4
0
18
667
lewis
lewis@saintsfclewis·
@pjcboro @Biggun26_ @AllenForSur3 Lovely lad but saints beat you in every stat! We went to europe, made almost half of the liverpool team that everyone recognises, and arguably the best academy in the championship !
English
1
0
1
183
Matthew Brook
Matthew Brook@BrookMatthew·
@AyazzThatKnacks @slbsn In fairness, I’d like to think they’d consider a poor decision (presumed only 1) out of 48 games as being a disproportionate punishment. I think fine and points deduction will be right and fair.
English
2
0
0
717
slbsn
slbsn@slbsn·
@BrookMatthew My feeling remains expulsion is disproportionate. The issue is the applicability of the alternatives. But my feeling is still that the Commission will try and find a way to avoid expulsion.
English
5
0
0
859
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@relax792 @slbsn Cheating in a knockout competition leads to expulsion, it's hardly brain surgery
English
0
0
0
23
neatola79
neatola79@relax792·
@slbsn Doesn’t fit with Swindon case in terms of the case or the punishment?
English
1
0
0
118
Neil Cox
Neil Cox@NeilCox139·
@DavidGHFrost We often say 'no taxation without representation'. Maybe we should start saying 'no representation without taxation'! It's easy to dip into others pockets for your own benefit!
English
2
0
2
326
David Frost
David Frost@DavidGHFrost·
Screen out all the left wing verbal babble, and what he & Burnham are saying is that people who don't use buses should be taxed to subsidise others who do. They think it's right that one group of voters should be able to vote themselves largesse from the public treasury, funded by others; and that this model should be extended to energy, water, and much else. There's a word for that, but it isn't "Manchesterism".
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

THE CASE FOR MANCHESTERISM by @DantonsHead Ask someone in Wythenshawe or Rochdale whether the buses are better than they were three years ago and they will say yes. Greater Manchester’s Bee Network is the most instructive public transport experiment in Britain not because it is radical in design but because it works. Since franchising began under Andy Burnham’s leadership, passenger numbers have risen for the first time in a generation. Routes have expanded into communities that private operators had abandoned as insufficiently profitable. Fares are capped at levels the deregulated system could not deliver. The model is now spreading. A public operator optimising for coverage and frequency rather than fare recovery serves a social need that private calculation screens out, while reducing system costs through public coordination. Manchesterism  works. Public control of essentials reduces the cost of provision by eliminating the privatisation premium and lowering coordination frictions, which in turn reduces the fiscal transfers required to make essentials accessible – progressively deflating the upward pressure on public spending that currently exposes the country to the harsh judgement of bond markets. Rebuilding public provision is not the alternative to fiscal prudence. It is fiscal prudence. What has been done for buses can be done with similar ambition for energy, water, housing, and care. The architecture operates at multiple scales simultaneously: national corporations for network infrastructure like energy and water, regional and municipal authorities for transport and housing, municipal providers for care and local services. The institutional template is already being built, sector by sector, in the places that have chosen to reclaim public control. That is why this is an argument for Manchesterism rather than a blueprint for Whitehall – its political character is decentralised, plural and democratically accountable. The question is whether national politics has the ambition to match it.

English
30
90
416
37.6K
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@L1minus10 Should I make my profile picture someone more fitting? Raymond Burr, given you're convinced what Boro have done is worse than spying?
English
0
0
0
24
Glen de la Cour (leagueoneminus10)
In danger of somehow coming out of this looking worse than #saintsfc, which takes some doing😂 I wonder if they'll go after the other teams they didn't beat in this 2 wins out of 13 run they're on. Keep that form up next season they'll be looking over their shoulder at League 1
Sky Sports News@SkySportsNews

BREAKING: Middlesbrough say Southampton should not take part in Championship play-off final after being charged with spying ahead of semi-final first leg between clubs.

English
22
7
184
26.6K
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@L1minus10 Still up on your profile, mind. So the point stands. Nobody will look worse than a bunch of cheats, btw
English
1
0
0
40
Ben Carter
Ben Carter@bensaint·
Fair to say Boro are becoming a bit embarrassing now. Wronged yes (and it was wrong) but any sense of proportionality or objectiveness seems to have gone out of the window. #saintsfc
English
48
10
145
9.3K
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@jasperiscool4 @Craigyrobbo81 @shirleymush I've seen my team win the League Cup and play in a European final. I'm happy with our success. I've never seen us lose nine nil, let alone to get to see it both home and away.
English
0
0
0
7
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@su4eranio Yes. You're going to the logical conclusion. If you've cheated all season you are toast.
English
0
0
1
31
Martin F
Martin F@su4eranio·
If EFL expel Soton, can only be cause they’ve done same to several clubs. If that’s the case, didn’t they only make play offs by cheating at expense of Wrexham, Derby, Norwich etc? Do they all get to sue Soton? See where I’m going? It’s just fucking ludicrous. Just move on!
English
20
2
41
10.4K
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@HG_SFC5 @bensaint Definitely. EFL should have postponed the legs, or made their sanction clear from the outset.
English
0
0
0
4
hg
hg@HG_SFC5·
@GhrestryRoad @bensaint Yes but again, if we went into the second leg trailing the setup could have been different for us.
English
1
0
0
2
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@HG_SFC5 @bensaint Yes. Hopefully sorted out soon, so at the very least Hull get some clarity.
English
0
0
0
5
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@HG_SFC5 @bensaint Yes, that's why that's excessive. But that's the precedent where the rule is established. It's not "just a points deduction" or a "fine" it is a serious sanction. CAS upheld it as well.
English
1
0
0
12
hg
hg@HG_SFC5·
@GhrestryRoad @bensaint Docking 66% of the points following the precedent this late into the season would lead to incredible grounds for appeal. It would put us stone dead last and relegate us.
English
1
0
0
13
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@HG_SFC5 @bensaint And as the result is, it wouldn't lead to a draw. The second leg ended 1-1 after normal time.
English
1
0
0
12
Gherm
Gherm@GhrestryRoad·
@HG_SFC5 @bensaint It would. But we're in uncharted territory for the EFL. Normally a result would be a 3-0 walkover if there was a clear example of rule breaking - you can Uefa moronic but that's the rule. bbc.co.uk/sport/football…
English
2
0
0
15