Gil Topaz

4.5K posts

Gil Topaz banner
Gil Topaz

Gil Topaz

@Gil_Topaz

M&A/Corporate Attorney | 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇵🇹 |⚽️| Geopolitics, Business & History 📕 reader | Not legal advice & posts are my own

Arlington, VA Katılım Şubat 2012
458 Takip Edilen602 Takipçiler
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@Eli_Albrecht Had a 200K one a few weeks ago. Client was a bit shocked 🤣
English
0
0
0
294
Eli Albrecht
Eli Albrecht@Eli_Albrecht·
It’s the time of year clients reach out flipping out that Delaware is charging them tens of thousands in franchise tax. In reality using the alternative rate brings the tax to hundreds. One of the slimiest things, and why we rarely form companies in Delaware anymore.
Eli Albrecht tweet media
English
10
0
52
10.5K
Keeks 🦋
Keeks 🦋@DietCoke_Esq·
I’m trying to convince this kid to go to law school. What are some fun lies I can tell him?
English
47
4
89
9.5K
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@nathan_e_hill @ all my clients that haven’t sent me a gift (aka all of them)
English
1
0
2
29
Nathan Hill
Nathan Hill@nathan_e_hill·
When clients send you gifts after closing >>>>>
Nathan Hill tweet media
English
3
0
10
273
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
Great opportunity for the candidate to find out how the partner will deal with the candidate managing up. If a partner can’t handle receiving pushback or corrections then it wouldn’t be the right fit for me. Naturally, you need to tailor the response, but something along the lines of “I haven’t considered that approach or view before, from my experience and understanding X is…”
English
0
0
1
52
Miss EsqHire
Miss EsqHire@MissEsqHire·
A candidate told me something interesting after an interview. He was asked a technical question by a partner. He answered it correctly. But the partner then explained why his answer was wrong… and proceeded to give an explanation that was actually incorrect. What wold you do?👇
English
1
0
1
441
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@SellersCounsel I’d add that high EQ will likely become far more relevant as well because AI will never replace the human aspect of deal/client work.
English
0
0
1
46
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
I think the play here if you are a law student is to learn as much as you can about the available AI tools. The ones that can demonstrate competency will leapfrog the application lines and will be better equipped to provide valuable assistance on deals. Basic deal knowledge will be less of a relevant skill because AI will simply do it better.
English
1
1
3
500
Seller's Counsel
Seller's Counsel@SellersCounsel·
Look, I’m not denying that this is cool. And if I were a law student wanting to do transactional work right now, I’d probably be a little bit nervous. But its use case is still very limited. This example only worked well because I had solid forms that were easy to verify if they had been changed correctly. And even on those simple tasks, it still missed stuff. But at least 60% of my practice doesn’t have good forms and is more complex than that. Not sure that it’ll ever make sense to use AI for those. Even if it got close, it would probably still be faster to do myself.
Seller's Counsel@SellersCounsel

Cool CoWork use case that I was surprised by: Here’s a purchase agreement. I need these 5 ancillary documents. Here are your starting forms. Go draft them. Spat out nearly perfect drafts in about 15 minutes including prompting and finding the forms. Granted, these are simple docs that only take me about an hour to do myself. But still cool.

English
4
0
15
14.4K
Nathan Hill
Nathan Hill@nathan_e_hill·
February kept the momentum going. After starting 2026 with six closings in January, I wrapped up four more deals in February, bringing my year-to-date total to 10 transactions totaling over $68 million in deal value. Congrats to our clients on their successful closings in February: $2.7 million purchase of a pharmacy company $2.25 million purchase of home services franchises $6.72 million sale of a commercial outdoor paving and decking supplier $6.16 million sale of a water treatment company Always grateful to work with great clients and great deal teams. Looking forward to many more successful closings for our @smblawgroup clients this year. Let's close a record number of deals this year.
English
2
1
10
371
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@SMB_Attorney Only AI would know this is as AI…do you have something to tell us?
English
0
0
0
144
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@Eli_Albrecht I think there was a joint-US training exercise on some outdated Russian equipment. Other than that I can’t think of anything!
English
0
0
2
63
Eli Albrecht
Eli Albrecht@Eli_Albrecht·
Hey guys, Just turning my phone on after Shabbat. Did I miss anything important?
English
16
0
129
10.4K
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
Laying off 40% of your company without even bothering to use capital letters feels ridiculously disrespectful
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
85
39
1.3K
130.9K
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@SellersCounsel As a native east coaster I take this personally! Explain yourself!
English
0
0
0
48
Seller's Counsel
Seller's Counsel@SellersCounsel·
I hate to break it to you east coast folks but yall have the worst time zone and it’s not even close
English
4
0
14
1.8K
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
The AI contracts I see are a litigator’s dream and a transactional attorney’s worst nightmare. IMHO DIY legal will only lead to more legal work as people realize they’re going to need lawyers more than ever to navigate the changing landscape. Obviously our work adjust accordingly as well, but it’s not going anywhere anytime soon.
English
1
2
23
1.3K
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
Everyone has been talking about these massive federal refunds for tax season…but this is the first time I’ve ever owed for federal. Not sure what they’re doing to get so much back…
English
0
0
0
135
Gil Topaz
Gil Topaz@Gil_Topaz·
@KurtisCarman Oh I totally agree with you. I would 100% drive. The only thing I can think of us is a good amount of people rely on public transportation here. So if you don’t have a car you have the flight option.
English
1
0
1
13
Kurtis Carman
Kurtis Carman@KurtisCarman·
I understand the appeal of Charlottesville but.... Parking, security, train, boarding (outside on an aluminum ramp at gate A3A no less), rolling around to the runway, 15 minutes in the air, rolling to the gate, deboarding, catching an uber/rental car shuttle.... Or 2 hours and you are there with your own car and as much stuff as you want to bring in your own car. That's where I'm confused.
English
1
0
1
49
Kurtis Carman
Kurtis Carman@KurtisCarman·
Why is there a fight from Dulles to Charlottesville?
English
1
0
0
82