Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
39.7K posts

Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
@GiladDvir
אבא של אילה, אביתר וירדן. תורם 994 של מתנת חיים.
Katılım Ocak 2013
501 Takip Edilen887 Takipçiler
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi

I love that the main actress, Jesus mom, is played by an Israeli😌😍
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm
First trailer for ‘MARY’, a coming-of-age biblical story about Mary’s conception of Jesus. Releasing December 6 on Netflix.
English
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi

Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi

Christians have been saying he was Jewish for more than 2 millennia.
What has changed? nothing.
Same old story of hate for the Jews.
The fact he was Jewish is even mentioned in the New Testament:
The initialism INRI represents the Latin inscription IESVS NAZARENVS REX IVDÆORVM (Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum), which in English translates to "Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews" (John 19:19).

English
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi

Merry Christmas and stop trying to change history and culturally appropriate everything cause you ain't got any identity✨
#MerryChristmas
#Jesus
#Gaza
#Palestine
#Israel

English
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi

x.com/drewpavlou/sta…
Sneako: Jesus was an Arab dude, not Jewish.
Literally the new testament:
Jesus was not only a descendant of Judah, a Jew, but he was also of the kingly line of Judah, as several verses refer to Jesus as "Son of David" -
Matthew 15:22; 21:9; Mark 10:47
Also, the initials INRI represents the Latin inscription Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum, which translates to "Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews" (John 19:19).
Is @sneako stupid + liar?
Yes.
English
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi
Gilad Dvir 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 retweetledi

How does the double appropriation of the Land of Israel manifest?
The term "Palestine," as it is understood today, did not exist during biblical times.
During the period of Jesus, the region was part of the Roman province of Judea.
The name "Palestine" was only officially used after the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–135 CE), when the Roman Empire renamed the province "Syria Palaestina" in an attempt to suppress Jewish identity and erase the connection to Judea, which was the homeland of the Jewish people.
So, when the pretense in the falsified article "History of Palestine" on @Wikipedia refers to "Palestine," it is using the term in a later, more modern context.
In ancient times, the region was known as Judea, Galilee, and other smaller regions depending on the specific location.
The Jewish people have had a continuous presence in the land throughout history, despite periods of exile and foreign rule.
Jesus, born into a Jewish family, was part of this rich Jewish heritage and history in the land.
The use of the article reflects a double appropriation of the land of Israel: First, beginning in Roman times when the name "Syria Palaestina" was introduced to erase Jewish identity in the land, and later by modern Palestinians, who claim to have historical roots in the region dating back to before the 19th century.

English

@ariehkovler ארנון בן דוד חי בתוך הבועה שלו. עשה טעות חמורה ביותר הערב.
עברית

@GiladDvir לצאת במבצע בלי אסטרטגיה ברורה או מטרות ריאליות? מי היה עושה דבר כזה?
עברית







