GitGame.io | Gaming Meets Collectibles

(5) Basketball Pack Giveaway nfthive.io/drop/8537 To Celebrate King Saladeen's new drop on @WAX_io - We're giving away 5 packs to 5 people! 1) Comment with WAX wallet. 2) Retweet 3) Join discord.gg/5ZJqsAtR & TG: t.me/+-l-A4XSq-hw1M… 4) Follow @landboxio & @Kingsaladeenart More info: wax-io.medium.com/jp-the-money-b… #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub #waxfam

@landboxio Today is the day and the start to something big

Drop is today! @Kingsaladeenart #waxp $waxp #waxhub #waxfam #waxnft #nft #nfts

Drop date is on 4/30/24 @ 1pm est. @Kingsaladeenart King Saladeen is bringing his iconic JP The Money Bear to WAX on April 30th, 1 PM EST. This isn't just any drop; it's about getting digital collectibles that can morph into physical, hold-in-your-hand collectibles. Get ready for an art-meets-blockchain adventure that turns digital collecting on its head. Learn more: youtube.com/watch?v=4K1s9V… youtube.com/watch?v=jypg5W… Official Website: jpthemoneybear.com Connect with King Saladeen: x.com/kingsaladeenart facebook.com/kingsaladeen/ instagram.com/kingsaladeen/ t.me/+-l-A4XSq-hw1M… discord.gg/bMNxqrSGkq #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub

LandBox v2 - Building Ownerships (with limited customizations) - New graphic pipeline - New crafting items in-game. - Optimizations - Town revamp - City revamp - Open world revamp - @gnocityio - open world with Gnome (@gnomeseries) playable characters. Blend will be created to obtain a 3D Gnome. - @farmwarsnftgame - farming section. #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub #waxfam #telos $tlos

Buildings in LandBox will go up for a bidding system. Those who already claimed a building via GitGame prior to 4/10/2024 will automatically get a building. There will be visuals where people can see what buildings are available through the web. Buildings do not go up for sale until the functionality is complete. Ex: Store selling a crafting item for 50 GITS. House displaying a gallery of art. Whitelist of who can enter a building etc. Once we complete the coding of that functionality is when we will release a bid for WAX or $LANBX (Need to find out from @neftyblocks) how to get LANBX on the list). The building will be a 1 of 1 and you are free to sell that NFT in the secondary market. This will be a slow release and not some big drop. #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub #waxfam

Enter the building. Earn $WUF. @WUFFI_Inu Get ready for LandBox v2! #waxp $waxp #waxhub #solana $SOL

@kaefergeneral @AlcieToo @WAX_io See now we’re getting somewhere. That makes way more sense instead of what was told to me from the start. I’m not going to throw specific person under the bus. They are part of WAX. At this point I don’t care, the explanation is fine. I’ll take this to another chain.

Thanks Alcie. And I do get the confusion now. The reason @GitGameio was asked to reach out to me was because I was the only one not outright recommending to reject his proposal. "Ok, it seems they're still reviewing. The OIGs lean towards rejecting it but wanted to see if the proposal can be changed from your end. So it'd be best to reach out to Kaefer for this" This essentially is where it stopped. He did not reach out to me, and I did not reach out to him. While the OIG doesn't make any decisions, the recommendation still holds some weight, even more so, if we are able to explain why we decided the way we did. We usually try to be unanimous in our recommendation. If we are not, we usually try to connect with the proposer, talk through the project, raise our concerns, or recommend adjustments. This is either done by the proposer being asked to reach out to us, or an individual IG reaching out to them; in most cases that's the IG that deviates from the others in his opinion. From there, we either schedule a call with the proposer with the entire OIG, or the individual IG circles back and shares what he learned in an internal discussion where we either decide how to move forward, finalize our recommendation, or explain why we abstain from giving one. In this case, neither happened, and no final recommendation was given. In cases like this, the WAX team either decides on its own, leaves the proposal open, or marks the proposal as "to be improved" with the request to connect with the OIG or an otherwise specific comment of their own. The whole thing with these recommendations is, that we do it because we want to improve the quality of submissions and decisions, not because it's our job as OIG. The OIG is in a unique position to give feedback on proposals due to the Guild evalautions and being part of the community. This gives us more insight into what is done and built on WAX and what is potentially needed. We currently have over 200 active contributions/projects from Guilds alone. This comes on top of what is built by the community and other companies or projects. The main reason we provide feedback is to prevent abuse, as we have seen in the past, where proposers took the work of others and 'sold' it to WAX Labs as new, simply because the WAX team didn't know it existed. But our actual work as OIG always takes priority over our contributions to WAX labs. So we can't always chase every proposer down to talk to them. Even if we do connect with them, it can take quite some time until things are sorted if there is no clear recommendation on our end, simply because we have to fit these calls and discussions in between all the other stuff we have to do.

Our proposal on @WAX_io was rejected. Thanks @kaefergeneral for rejecting our proposal. And putting other proposals through that have 0 benefit to the WAX ecosystem. 🤟 I am going to build our system to show you made a mistake. 🫡 labs.wax.io/proposals/182 #waxp $waxp #waxnft

@kaefergeneral @WAX_io Im so curious to know which one is it?

@kaefergeneral @WAX_io Why would I have to reach out to you? If you didn’t reject it? What powers do you have then? Why would OIGs geared towards rejection? You actually said it yourself they ask for feedback to you. So not sure which one it is now… 🤔

@kaefergeneral @WAX_io If your here to make WAX better why we approving proposals that do absolutely nothing to the eco system? Is it because I am not chatting or connected to you or WAX in anyway? Tell me why it was rejected. Public sounds great. Transparency right?

Hey @GitGameio, Sorry for the confusion, but I do not have any say in what is or isn't approved on WAX Labs. The WAX team asks the OIG for feedback, but ultimately they are the ones making the decision. It does make sense to reach out to us and talk about your proposal so we can better understand what you are building, and represent your project to WAX. But ultimately it's them making the decision. Even starting a discussion on the official WAX Labs channel to talk about your proposal and gather feedback. But publicly blaming someone on Twitter for something he isn't in charge of, definitely isn't the way ;)

@WijsBe @SpikeCollects Yeah we can gamify anything. Provide true numbers to games and the retention.

@SpikeCollects @GitGameio , this is something gitgame can do right ?

Hot take🔥: Can we stop using active wallet addresses as the key metric for blockchains? Most of these metrics are botted or low value. Instead, we should be looking at the amount of money spent and user engagement on these platforms. Why isn’t this metric valuable to track? I’ve spoken to several chains and games, and their main method to drive this number up is through questing or achievement platforms. The problem is that users just hop from game to game to collect their loot, and there is little to retention. Web3 guilds and questing platforms selling wallet activity based on a dollar per user basis is not the way forward. Instead the focus should be on collabs, content, live events, and tournaments.

Mining Page got a new design. >> Mine away: landboxhub.io #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub

Entries for Secondary Market Purchases to win up to 3,000 WAX & More: 7 Entries l4yba.wam 9 Entries tpjb4.wam 2 Entries hcora.wam 1 Entries eqjbu.wam 9 Entries zh3b2.wam 1 Entries m..b.wam 3 Entries nblig.wam 1 Entries fwkri.wam 20 Entries ve22q.c.wam 1 Entries orsr.wam 1 Entries 4nx3a.c.wam 1 Entries dpqqw.wam 1 Entries orsr.wam 1 Entries 5tack.wam 3 Entries umwcq.wam 4 Entries nop4y.c.wam 1 Entries 2jtro.wam 2 Entries cm5.q.c.wam 7 Entries ywhbu.wam 1 Entries 42tec.wam 3 Entries princevegeta 3 Entries zofro.wam 4 Entries u.sqy.wam 1 Entries a1hd.wam 5 Entries valkyriawomb 18 Entries ijlh2.wam 6 Entries ouu4s.c.wam 13 Entries 3t34c.c.wam 6 Entries zysas.wam 1 Entries qdil2.c.wam

Crafting event is ready for the Elixir. You need to select 10 Elixirs to start a craft. landboxgame.com #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub #waxfam

Prizes: Win Up to 3,000 WAX, GEN2 Mining Pack, Monster Fight Pack & More... Number of Winners: 10 Winners Selected @ Random: February 24th Simple ways to win: 1) Make a purchase on the secondary market for LandBox. wax.atomichub.io/market?collect… 2) Each purchase you make on secondary you are entered in the raffle. #waxp $waxp #waxnft #waxhub