BC

269 posts

BC banner
BC

BC

@GlassRook

Nunya, Appalachia Katılım Ekim 2023
109 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@mercenaryx21 @MadamSavvy @MommaOcco @RealSchlep I've seen an alarming number of people talking about how they saved or shared content they considered to be CSAM around this situation, schlep himself won't stop posting that admittedly horrible drawing someone did of him, despite calling it CSAM.
English
0
0
0
24
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@bleeachs @Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep "...don't actually address what it really is" Your inability to distinguish reality and fiction isnt on me. Fictional content isnt the same thing, and you morons provide actual cover for pedophiles and belittle that word. Soon enough it'll mean as much as racist or nazi.
English
1
0
0
14
ISICK
ISICK@bleeachs·
@GlassRook @Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep Nobody gives a damn you're not ACTUALLY a rapist or murderer or whatever. Good for you but it doesn't matter. You're just controlling the argument so people don't address what it really is.
English
1
0
0
20
Schlep
Schlep@RealSchlep·
These lolicons are citing Chris hansen when he literally just reposted my tweet. You are not accepted anywhere
Schlep tweet media
English
99
85
747
93.5K
Wian
Wian@T0SEnthusiast·
@SakurakoHikari @GLAsk1d @bx_on_x its all just "fictional" till someone draws an anime character in darker skin tone and all off a sudden it isnt fictional anymore
English
1
0
7
103
Bx
Bx@bx_on_x·
Commenters: Loli isn't for pedophiles! It's just grown men liking cute little anime girls dressed in sexy clothes! It's a cartoon! Also the commenters:
lost soul@chudlarper

@bx_on_x

English
70
250
3.6K
44.6K
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Satomu_Senseii @GLAsk1d @bx_on_x The first does too. Just because he didn't save it locally, that just means he saved what he considers CSAM to somebody else's drives so he could access it later.
English
1
0
6
57
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@ballssummoner53 @berserker144 @BlackzRasta @RealSchlep In this context schlep directly linked and shared images of what he considers CSAM. I agree the drawings made were horrible. claiming them to be CSAM belittles what actually constitutes it, and by his own logic makes him liable for distribution.
English
0
0
3
73
not miserable
not miserable@ballssummoner53·
@berserker144 @BlackzRasta @RealSchlep ah yes because drawing art of chibi as hitler is totally the same thing as drawing NSFW of a REAL person's grooming experience. you fucking weirdos don't actually care about kids. real or not. if you guys actually did, you wouldn't be stooping down to this level.
English
1
4
90
851
Schlep
Schlep@RealSchlep·
On the Twitter’s news tab, people are sharing lewd drawings of me as a child, with thousands of likes knowing I’m a grooming survivor. this is the only image i can show on this because it’s so fucking disgusting.
Schlep tweet media
English
655
2.3K
21.4K
1.4M
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@bleeachs @Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep When you find them, will you report them to the police? The point either flew over your head, or you're too busy trying to gotcha to understand.
English
1
0
0
44
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep Cyclical is what I said and its what I meant. Ypu repeat yourself. You have no argument, you've even fully conceded to me, yet you lash out.
English
1
0
0
13
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep Cynical? Or are they just truth and it makes you uncomfortable? You have addressed it. By denying what it actually is.
English
1
0
0
12
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep I'm sure the military games are pure negotiations, and deflection and ad hominem I've already denied. Again, you operate on a nothing but vibes basis
English
0
0
1
10
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep I don't. I don't like playing those games. I play military games. But I think it's pretty weird to play games where you can just kill civilians.. It's definitely not as weird as looking at fictional children in a lustful way.
English
1
0
0
14
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep I think the clearest line of thought is this. Why are you sexually attracted to fictional children?
English
1
0
0
10
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep Your thoughts are entirely cyclical, and ive already denied/addressed this. You're useless to speak to. You project your deflections and mental gymnastics onto others because you can't refute anything on any actual ground, and its all vibe based to you.
English
1
0
0
15
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep It is fiction. But they are depicted as children. Like, why are you defending this? People don't go play GTA and fantasize while playing it about doing those things in real life. You look at Loli's and fantasize about it, whether fictional or not. That's a dangerous path
English
1
0
0
19
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep I have a clear throughline of thought, unlike you. You still never refute that its fiction, so go ahead and turn yourself in for your various murder sprees.
English
2
0
0
28
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep Jumping through a lot of hoops here to defend you like looking at underage children. Fictional or not. That's just weird. Adios because this convo isn't going anywhere no matter what I say. You're always to find some creepy defense
English
1
0
0
22
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep Unlike you and your chart, I stayed on topic. Trying to draw a distinct separation between fiction and reality. Furthering my point by pushing the analogy into the cover you morons provide for actual predators. After all, how much bite does the term nazi have?
English
1
0
0
27
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@PattyNest @LeyleysGoodBoy @RealSchlep "I dont understand how to engage with an analogy" is an interesting strategy. Hey, how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
English
1
0
3
29
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep I think murder is sickening. Worse still I think would be obfuscation of what actually constitutes murder, where actual murderers could escape justice because resources and attention are driven away towards people who did a pretend murder. Now, can you define analogy?
English
1
0
1
32
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep Yeah well one of you creeps sent this to me earlier. Pretty telling that Loli's are in fact depicted as children, if not all the time. They are. And that's sickening
Jason Lewis tweet media
English
1
0
0
28
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@PattyNest @LeyleysGoodBoy @RealSchlep Good comeback, really shows you're in a good position in an argument or debate when your only response comes down to a personal attack. Besides, why would I care what a dogfucker thinks?
English
1
0
4
33
Tristan 🎩
Tristan 🎩@Trisdraws478·
@CoraiNorai @Thefakejoetuna You're right, this is a sign that I should just block and ignore yall because I'm genuinely tired of having debates on a platform that's designed to contain the opposite of those.
English
3
0
2
1.8K
Tristan 🎩
Tristan 🎩@Trisdraws478·
"It's not a real person so it doesn't matter" THAT'S A CHILD!!!! WHO THE HELL CARES IF THEY'RE A DRAWING OR A REAL PERSON, THEY'RE STILL A GOD DAMN CHILD!!! No wonder why the internet has a pedophile issue. Half of the people on this site are encouraging their behavior...
GIF
Schlep@RealSchlep

Lolicon is pedophilia. If you gratify yourself to sexualized images of animated children you’re a predator the fact X allows a community of these people to thrive on here is very shocking. Do better @Safety

English
47
4
43
72.4K
BC
BC@GlassRook·
@Jasonlewis54 @RealSchlep "Exploits children" those poor scream queens who gave their lives getting murdered will never be forgotten. Still can't and haven't refuted it. Also Loli≠Children, tourist. Don't talk about things you don't understand.
English
1
0
0
34
Jason Lewis
Jason Lewis@Jasonlewis54·
@GlassRook @RealSchlep I would say the biggest difference is one doesn't involve children of that canon in a sexually exploitive way. There's other ways to refute it as well. But I've tried multiple times today, and you just continue to defend content that sexually exploits children. So no use
English
1
0
0
24