GotchuJunkyu

10.5K posts

GotchuJunkyu

GotchuJunkyu

@GotchuJunkyu

Katılım Aralık 2018
989 Takip Edilen582 Takipçiler
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
,
,@maxwell3431·
I wish my White billionare fav sued a 17 Year old Woman of color
English
6
161
4.2K
137K
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
.
.@speakfilms·
music doesn’t exist in a vacuum, babe. taylor swift didn’t invent yelling on bridges. if so, she should sue her best friend sabrina for yelling on the bridge of taste lol
English
5
47
1.1K
22.5K
Taylor Crave
Taylor Crave@mainpopgirI·
“No, we don’t have a feud.” Is that so hard? You don’t owe anyone anything, but that’s literally the least you can do for someone you (used to) look up to, especially when a sizable chunk of your fans (not random “internet” people) are propagating lies against Taylor every month.
English
42
488
4.4K
129.1K
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
m | fan account
m | fan account@goodgirlffaith·
“Can she just confirm or deny” You’re not gonna like her answer, and you’re just gonna end up attacking her and calling her a liar
English
16
132
2K
41.2K
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
Genevieve 🚅 ✈️🐝
Genevieve 🚅 ✈️🐝@DorotheaMarj·
When swifties say, why don’t she just kill the rumors and say that Taylor did nothing wrong? First of all, interviewers keep asking her about it. She doesn’t bring it up. Second of all, have yall considered that Taylor did actually do something wrong and Olivia was hurt by it. Olivia’s not gonna say that it’s all butterflies and rainbows when she’s the one who’s been wronged. Olivia doesn’t stir the pot. She deflects the question bc she knows whatever she says, swifties are gonna keep attacking her. Notice how Taylor hasn’t said anything about it either? Why do swifties expect Olivia to clear this issue up when no matter what she says, yall will never be satisfied. Consider also that Taylor and her Tree Paine PR machine has all the power to speak out about this issue but they don’t bc clearly they wouldn’t look good if they do address it. Taylor would rather keep it ambiguous than admit that she called up Olivia and demanded that she give her song credits.
@bratzmeg

oh my god olivia sounded so sad :( the deja vu situation definitely hurt her

English
42
134
2.1K
111.9K
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
Eshan
Eshan@eshanbuilds·
The babydoll dress Olivia Rodrigo got criticized for has a name. It is called kinderwhore, and it was built in the early 1990s to make the exact argument she just made. The term was coined in 1993 by music journalist Everett True, combining the German word for child with the English word for whore. The look is specific: childlike babydoll dresses, Peter Pan collars, Mary Janes, paired with smeared red lipstick and dark eye makeup. Innocence and adult sexuality forced into the same frame on purpose. Kat Bjelland of Babes in Toyland and Courtney Love of Hole pioneered it. They shared an apartment and a wardrobe in the 1980s before either was famous. In a 1994 Rolling Stone interview, Love was explicit that the look was built to read as ironic rather than seductive. The irony was the entire point. A grown woman dressed as a doll, screaming into a microphone, daring the audience to decide whether they were looking at a child or a threat. The discomfort that produced was the art. It made the viewer's own gaze visible to them. Which is what makes the criticism of Rodrigo so clarifying. Her actual complaint is that a revealing stage outfit was called fine and a fully-covered babydoll dress was called inappropriate, and that the gap between those two reactions says something about who is doing the looking. That gap is the thesis kinderwhore was built on three decades ago. When Rodrigo says she felt like Kathleen Hanna or Courtney Love, she is not reaching for a vague aesthetic. Hanna led the riot grrrl movement and Love built the look beside it, and both spent the early 1990s being told the same things Rodrigo is being told now, by people who thought they were delivering a fresh objection. The replies calling the dress inappropriate think they are critiquing the aesthetic. They are completing it.
Pop Base@PopBase

Olivia Rodrigo speaks out on criticism for wearing babydoll dresses during Popcast interview: “What’s really, like, disturbing is I feel like I have worn outfits that are revealing on stage. Like I’ve been on stage in like a sparkly bra, little shorts, which is my right. That’s fun. I felt cool and comfortable in that. And like that wasn’t “inappropriate” — but me, like, fully covered up in a dress that people deem to be, like, childlike was inappropriate. And I just think it just like shows how we really normalize pedophilia in our culture. And also it’s just this rhetoric that we’re fed as girls since we’re so little, which is like, ‘Don’t wear that because then a man is going to sexualize your body and it’s your fault.’ Like it’s so weird. And I didn’t think I looked sexy in that at all — I was like ‘This is so cool. I feel like I look like Kathleen Hanna or Courtney Love.’ All these people who are my heroes.” (instagram.com/reel/DY25os4jO…)

English
64
786
8.5K
1M
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
໊
@diecul·
the biggest noise pollutants in the music industry
English
127
2.7K
30.3K
409.5K
GotchuJunkyu retweetledi
Seby
Seby@simp4jhomikha·
Nah, man. If you look at it, sobrang chef’s kiss ng composition ng new minority. Veteran senators in Senators Kiko, Tito, Bam, Risa, JV, Ping, Win, and JV. Two of the newer ones who happen to be good at speaking when needed and have the spine to stand up in the Tulfo brothers. You have a lawyer in Sen. Kiko, a former PNP chief in Sen. Ping, two members of the media in the Tulfo brothers, a statesman who is focusing on education in Sen. Bam, a Mindanao representation in Sen. Migz, the former SP in Sen. Sotto, a good committee head in Sen. Win, and a progressive in Risa Hontiveros.
Kiko Pangilinan@kikopangilinan

Solid Bloc. 🇵🇭

English
60
4.2K
28K
658K