Gowsik Darshan

@ADesignz06 RCB poster edits always been peak. Fantastic works🔥

"The new ChatGPT images 2.0 is insane" Here are some posters I created without AI

@nothingindia Red♥️

red or green? one follower takes one home

@silenceatslip @RVCJ_FB He meant, premium allrounders like cameron green, after auction stating to their team they can only bowl max 2-3 overs to avoid injuries. This is a half-baked tweet for getting reach

@RVCJ_FB Never heard of someone refusing to bowl all overs unless they went for plenty/ injured. 🤔

Ravi Ashwin!

@parasVK What about 50+ balls

Lowest SR while playing 60+ balls in an IPL Inning :- 93.65 - JP Duminy vs PBKS, 2009 109.67 - A Finch vs MI, 2014 111.47 - KL Rahul vs GT, 2023 112.9 - D Warner vs PBKS, 2019 112.9 - S Gill vs SRH, 2020 120.3 - S Marsh vs RR, 2013 121.6 - B Hodge vs MI, 2009 123.07 - J Kallis vs RR, 2011 125.0 - C Gayle vs MI, 2010

@arnav1204aj Wow yes thanks

Relaxed the filter a bit, he is here now.

@arnav1204aj Jaiswal is not in vs pace ranking. Is it due to sample size filter?

I dive deep into tackling problems like accounting for conditions, how simple mean values across lengths can misguide, and how different T20 competitions should be weighted. In the end, I come up with player ratings for the global T20 rankings.

Steve Smith came out all guns blazing for Sixers in the BBL, but there’s no way to know what those performances mean in terms of where he stands globally. These rankings help. They are more than ICC's just T20I rankings. They are global T20 rankings. 🔗 open.substack.com/pub/arnavj/p/t…

@grok @TrueDisrespect @mohit12j @bholination I asked about virat's stats lol

Gautam Gambhir's T20I stats: 37 matches, 932 runs in 36 innings, average 27.41, strike rate 119.03. Highest 75, seven 50s. Solid opener numbers in the 2007-2012 era when T20Is were still developing and overall scoring was lower than today. He featured in India's 2007 T20 World Cup-winning squad.

You were also scoring 160-170 on competitive pitches and then started preparing roads. Stfu

@TrueDisrespect @mohit12j @bholination @grok help him learn the fact

@mohit12j @bholination Chokli has 120sr biggest choker.

@cricketingview Please post if you have table for avg as well! Excellent compilation of data

@vchaubey641 @cricketingview Not a bad option in my opinion. Kuldeep is a wicket taker. Doesn't matter if he goes for some runs. Varun looks bad when there is no assistance in the pitch. But... Everything aside. Its still a 50-50 call

@cricketingview Should India use kuldeep instead of Varun? Left arm wrist seems to be better than right arm wrist... Also, if Arsh bowls with good pace variations, he will be crucial as NZ batters are pretty poor against Left arm medium...

@Adityakrsaha Look at the qsn asked 1st

It's going to be either an aura/troll statement, depending on tomorrow's match result.

@TheCricketPanda What about varun vs brook

Key Player Matchups for 2nd Semi Final (T20 numbers) ◉ Abhishek vs Archer: 61 off 33 (0 wkts) ◉ Arshdeep vs Salt: 4/50 ◎ Varun vs Buttler: 5/80 ◎ Bumrah vs Curran: 4/19 ------------------------- ◉ Archer vs Samson: 3/25 ◉ Buttler vs Hardik: Avg 86, SR 165 ◎ Rashid vs Tilak/Hardik: Eco 3.9 ◎ Overton vs Hardik: 3/24

@prasannalara With respect to both teams, by the same logic you used for WI, They were brushed aside with no competition against a quality side. Amen

Congratulations NZL on a well deserved thumping win. Hard luck to SA. Getting this far with one spinner and bowling least amount of spin in the tournament itself is a decent run.

@arnav1204aj Ohh ok.. Thanks

@GowsikGD I've used strike rates and control %

Just finished with an analysis on finding how batting quality differs across different leagues and T20Is. I took a total of 12 competitions including a separation of T20Is in two groups which I'll discuss later. Next, I created a batters pool taking batters with significant balls

@pyarkimkc End of the day, this is what we all live for🤍. Happy that he retired from tests & t20is when people didn't give back the respect he deserved

This is so wholesome 🥹🥹

@ashh_17_ This is too good

Should have been like this, but i don’t really hate the one they have either

@gitpush_gitpaid @amypretzel Skill issues😜

@amypretzel explain this then

the zipper is one of the most underrated mechanical engineering achievements in history and I think about it more than is probably normal let's actually look at what it's doing. you have two strips of interlocking teeth, each one a tiny precisely-shaped hook. a slider (which is just a wedge with a very specific internal geometry) runs along them. on the closing side, the wedge forces the teeth together at exactly the right angle so they lock. on the opening side, it drives them apart cleanly. no motor. no electronics. no power source. just geometry doing exactly one job perfectly, every single time, for the entire lifespan of the garment. that slider is doing something mechanically elegant that most people never think about: it's converting linear motion into a locking and unlocking mechanism across two independent flexible tracks simultaneously. if you tried to explain that as an engineering problem without showing someone a zipper, it would sound extremely hard to solve. and it essentially never fails. think about how many times you've zipped and unzipped a jacket. thousands of times over years of ownership. the mechanism works. it degrades gracefully when it does wear out - usually it just gets a little stiff, it doesn't catastrophically break. for a mechanism that costs almost nothing to manufacture and gets used daily, the reliability is almost unreasonable. but here's the part that actually gets me: the zipper was invented in 1851. it didn't reach mass adoption until the 1930s. that's 80 years of a working, functional, elegant mechanism just sitting there waiting for the world to figure out what to do with it. it wasn't a technology problem. the zipper worked. it was a use case problem. nobody could figure out where it fit. early versions were marketed for boots and tobacco pouches. the fashion industry wanted nothing to do with it. it was considered a novelty. then B.F. Goodrich put it on a rubber boot and called it a zipper (named after the sound it makes) and suddenly people got it. then it went on flight suits. then trousers. then everything. 80 years. not because the engineering was wrong. because the context hadn't caught up yet. there's a version of this story that applies to almost every transformative tool. the technology exists. it works. it's elegant. and it just sits there, waiting for someone to find the use case that makes it obvious. the zipper just happens to be the most literal example of that gap between invention and adoption that we interact with every single day, usually without thinking about it at all.

@vikram_tuteja @mohalimonster Cannot complain sammy for that! A win is a win. WI "A" team were playing like a "C" team when he took over... You can't just say, that SA team was a C team just bcos 3/11 players were not a starters in "A" team

@GowsikGD @mohalimonster SAF "C" team it was that toured WI right before the WC. Their bowling was Club Level at best.

@vikram_tuteja @mohalimonster In t20s, they have clean sweeped SA "twice" under his coaching

@mohalimonster When did WI beat SAF in a T20 series?? Kuch bhi bolna hai?