David Grangier

36 posts

David Grangier

David Grangier

@GrangierDavid

ML research with practical impact.

Katılım Aralık 2019
56 Takip Edilen444 Takipçiler
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
#NeurIPS2025 Mixing different datasets to train your LLM? ✨ We can help you find the perfect blend! 📈 Few small-model experiments → scaling law fit → your optimal mixture. 🎯 Easy + efficient. Chat with us 💬 Poster #3414. Thu, Dec 4, 11am
Mustafa Shukor@MustafaShukor1

We propose new scaling laws that predict the optimal data mixture, for pretraining LLMs, native multimodal models and large vision encoders ! Only running small-scale experiments is needed, and we can then extrapolate to large-scale ones. These laws allow 1/n 🧵

English
0
1
5
1.7K
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
⦿ Efficient, scalable approach on LM and Q&A domains. ⦿ Single & multitask. ⦿ Pretraining & continued pretraining. ⦿ Ablations on data size, model size... arxiv.org/abs/2410.03735 4/4
David Grangier tweet media
English
0
0
0
194
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
🚀Easy with clustered importance sampling: 1️⃣ cluster the generalist dataset, 2️⃣ resample the clusters w/ their prior from tiny specialist data, 3️⃣ Done! 🏁 3/4
English
1
0
1
242
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
New paper! arxiv.org/abs/2410.03735 Clustered importance sampling to build specialist Language Models (LMs) 🤔 Build a specialist LM with very little specialist data 💡How? Generalist data + efficient, scalable importance sampling w/ @Olivia61368522+SkylerSeto+@PierreAblin 1/4
David Grangier tweet media
English
1
14
25
8.1K
rohan anil
rohan anil@_arohan_·
@GrangierDavid Do you notice/study dependency on batch size and number of steps.
English
1
0
1
337
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
At ICML? Learn about our efficient projected language models! Adding capacity to a traditional language model improves accuracy but increases inference cost. How to avoid this? We propose a novel architecture, projected networks (PN).
David Grangier tweet media
English
3
5
26
2.9K
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
With Angelos Katharopoulos, Pierre Ablin, Awni Hannun.
English
0
0
0
209
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
2/2 Findings: when the application-specific training budget is large, importance sampling is great. Otherwise, asymmetric models (big at train, small at inference e.g. mixture of experts or hyper-networks) are attractive, better than the popular distillation strategy.
English
1
0
1
255
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
New language model work! In practice, LMs often face a double constraint (i) small inference budget + (ii) little application-specific data: (i) means small specialized models for inference; (ii) means using auxiliary generic data e.g. for pretraining 1/2 arxiv.org/abs/2402.01093
David Grangier tweet media
English
1
13
35
5.9K
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
Our analysis proposes a simple test to check if our method applies to your problem. Chat with us at our poster at #neurips2023 DistShift workshop next week. Joint work with Pierre Ablin, Awni Hannun. (3/3)
English
0
0
3
425
David Grangier
David Grangier@GrangierDavid·
Large models are often trained on massive web datasets and a bit of target-task data. In this setup, it is 👍 to spend more train effort on specific parts of the large set. Our online algorithm maintains an auxiliary cheap filter model when training the large model. (2/3)
English
1
0
3
542