Throngler

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 My mistake then, I should've added fictional in the previous tweet. Someone drawing/animating a fictional child (like the Pokemon preschooler) doing sexual acts, means that they're making fictional child porn (and would also fit in the loli porn category). Agree or disagree?

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 You just added fictional now lmfao

I'm all for separating fiction and reality but I'mma be real you will never look good defending loli stuff man. It's not like other things like incest or rape where you can argue their narrative value even outside of dark fetishes, the only "use" for lolicon is to goon to prepubescent looking characters. Even with those fetishes there are safe, consensual outlets for them like roleplaying with an adult partner, which doesn't exist for something like this. I'm not saying liking it inherently makes you a pedophile but you have to realize how bad it looks, and the harder you defend it the worse you look. This isn't something a majority of people will ever come around on.

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 For all intents and purposes, a preschooler from Pokemon is a fictional, animated child. Where is the disagreement here?

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 For all intents and purposes? Are you retarded?

@mecuning @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 That's ok. As long as you're not looking to normalize it or defend it , but actually keep it to yourself and out of the public eye, then that's fine. I wish the same held true for media like Blue Archive, that's already very much being seen by society's eyes.

@Great_Stuffing @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 your morality is not universal truth is just your opinion for me as long It has his space along with all the morally gray things, i'm not looking to normalize It at society scale.

@Seiashusband @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 It's a fictional child from an Anime/Video game. Sexualizing her means sexualizing a fictional drawing of a child. And that shouldn't be defended or normalized.

@Great_Stuffing @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 But still isn’t an actual child.

@mecuning @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 It's good that it's morally frowned upon, though, and kept away from the public eye. The same holds true for lolicon and sexualizations of children in Cartoons/Anime and video games, which shouldn't be normalized or defended.

@Great_Stuffing @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 Well that is just your opinion is not illegal anywhere for child-like women to do porn or fuck,because is about consent not looks.

@mecuning @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 Sexualizing juvenile features is pretty morally questionable, and shouldn't be so comfortably normalized (irregardless of legality). For example, I'd consider a Japanese porn genre, with very petite actresses who are 145cm tall or less and act like children, to be morally wrong.

@Great_Stuffing @SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 Not really is only sexualize juvenile features like with young looking porns stars and women and that is not ilegal also.

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 Yes, a cartoon character that's, for all intents and purposes, considered a child.

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 Because they are fucking cartoons??? Lmao

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 If they look, act, dress, are aged and adressed like a child, why would they not be considered a child? For example, how would the preschooler tamer from Pokemon be considered a loli, but not a child?

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 You're again just saying it normalizes it with no evidence. No, it's not the same, the reason why it isn't pedophilia is because it is unrealistic. If someone sexualizes a drawing that looks realistic, even if the child is not real, it is reliable to tell them are a pedophile

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 The difference is that one is real, and one is fiction. One causes direct harm to the involved child, while the other one normalizes sexualizing drawings of children. If a drawing was super realistic, but the drawn child wasn't actually real, would that make a difference to you?

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 Now you're acting like you cant tell the difference of real and fiction for the sake of it. You have to evidence that defending lolis leads to child sexualization, you know you can't do that

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 A good chunk of lolis are addressed as children in their own mediums. Unless you're specifically against sexualizing those ones in particular. But even if you are, there are still a lot of people that would defend it, with the only argument being that "It's fiction".

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 That's not sexual attraction towards children, I am absolutely defending the sexual attraction towards lolis, not kids

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 The fact that there are so many people today that are okay with porn of animated children, with even some people defending and arguing why it's normal to be sexually attracted to animated children.

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 Evidence on that "normalization" please

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 Lolicon outnumbers scat 100k times over, so of course people will massively engage with the lolicon argument. But even aside from that, it makes sense people will care and be more disgusted to the drawn depiction of a sexualized child, than a sexualized turd.

If that was the only relationship you would see ppl qrting scat to attack it, even in less rates. But lolicon is much more prevalent and ppl are way more willing to engage with it. You could still just mute block and move on. The actual reality is that cute anime girls are cute. The reason you bandwagon about it is a baseless moral ick, not the feelings of disgust

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 The problem is, Lolicon is much more prevalent than scat. If scat had a noticable push through mainstream views (like lolicon does through various anime, and games like Blue Archive, and partially games like Genshin Impact), then it too would deserve to be heavily scrutinized.

@Great_Stuffing @KaiKai2492 Normal people when they are disgusted by something, just avoid it. The problem with people is not simply disgust, overwhelming majority of people are disgusted of scat porn and we just avoid it, we don't pick fights to put that shit on ppls TL calling it disgusting.

@MexiconMolester @esjesjesj @g3m33 Evan's not black

@esjesjesj @g3m33 He said niggas who aren’t pedophiles

ポルノ中毒かペドかロリコンかオルタナ右翼以外で、純粋に日本が好なアメリカ男性って存在する？

@SisCunnyFan @KaiKai2492 There's no need to put this shit out into the public though. Normal people will reasonably be disgusted by it. Why not keep it to yourselves?

@KaiKai2492 Lolis aren't categorically "prepubescent looking" at all. I also don't care about how it "looks like" to normies. And Kafka trap is really meaningless

@bdavidsonlamb1 @Liberty4C @LibertyCappy Why can't he have the same energy on eliminating the Russofascism source in Russia? Or at least a fraction of it?

@Liberty4C @LibertyCappy I agree with about 65% of the things Trump does. Eliminating islamofacism source in Iran is one that I agree with.

The insults hurled at Right-Wing folks who are unhappy with Trump starting a war happen to be identical to the insults I heard from Leftists for the last 15 years

@LibertyCappy Literally doing the meme

@ChibiReviews It takes zero effort to not make a video about it. There was zero need to make a "Lolicon defense" video.

Fuck it, I'm making a Loli defense video today Already been canceled, had 100,000s of 1000s of death threats, and false accusations. I have nothing to lose and will not stop speaking up for freedom of expression within artwork

@captive_dreamer @jakeshieldsajj How much would someone need to pay you to make it a western showdown duel? Guns, cowboy boots and all that. Make fights have consequences.

@jakeshieldsajj Jake if you pay me 1 million I will come into the ring and fight you

Notice how silent the Democrats have been on this war