WarMind

CEO of Alphabet Google 🇮🇳 CEO of Microsoft 🇮🇳 CEO of YouTube 🇮🇳 CEO of Adobe 🇮🇳 CEO of Procter & Gamble (P&G) 🇮🇳 CEO of T-Mobile US 🇮🇳 CEO of World Bank Group 🇮🇳 CEO of IBM 🇮🇳 CEO of Infosys 🇮🇳 CEO of NetApp 🇮🇳 CEO of Palo Alto Networks 🇮🇳 CEO of Arista Networks 🇮🇳 CEO of Novartis 🇮🇳 CEO of Micron Technology 🇮🇳 CEO of Honeywell 🇮🇳 CEO of Flex 🇮🇳 CEO of Wayfair 🇮🇳 CEO of Chanel 🇮🇳 CEO of Cognizant 🇮🇳 CEO of Vertex Pharmaceuticals 🇮🇳 CEO of Molson Coors Beverage Company 🇮🇳 Note: citizens of India, citizens of other countries but born in India, Indian origin, or with Indian parents

Belgian man convicted of hate speech describes the judicial rationale for his latest conviction. I asked Gemini: Is this man's account of his conviction accurate? Gemini replied that it was grossly inaccurate. So, I copied and pasted Gemini's response, and asked Grok to reply to it. Grok told me that Gemini was mixing up two different cases, and that the tweet was an accurate representation of the latest judicial proceeding against Van Langenhove. I went back to Gemini, and asked it to reply to what Grok had just told me, and it responded: "Grok is completely correct. I mixed up the cases, and I appreciate the correction." As I've tweeted in the past: This sort of thing happens all the time.