Greg Faletto

1.6K posts

Greg Faletto

Greg Faletto

@GregoryFaletto

Statistician, Data Scientist @Video_Amp. Formerly @Google, PhD @USC, @ZipRecruiter, @WUSTL.

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Ekim 2019
741 Takip Edilen473 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
github.com/gregfaletto/fe… {fetwfe} is really easy to get started with. Just provide a panel data set (formatted as described in the documentation), and you'll get an estimate of the overall ATT, the ATT for each cohort, and standard errors for all of these.
English
1
0
1
316
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
I'm excited to announce that {fetwfe} is now available on CRAN! cran.r-project.org/web/packages/f… You can now install {fetwfe} by simply using ```install.packages("fetwfe")``` While preparing the package for CRAN, I also fixed a couple little bugs and edge cases from the original version
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto

NEW R PACKAGE: I created the {fetwfe} package to implement fused extended two-way fixed effects (FETWFE), my estimator for difference-in-difference under staggered adoptions. Link to GitHub and short thread below:

English
1
0
3
221
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
You don't have to be part of some billionaire's political agenda. Come on over to the other site, it's great. You can find me with the same profile photo, and my handle there is my website domain
English
0
0
0
83
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
@njhochman @mattyglesias Many people on the left use the word "privilege" to refer to the same thing that you're labeling "good fortune"
English
0
0
1
129
Khoa Vu
Khoa Vu@KhoaVuUmn·
Out of all ridiculous responses to the meme, this is the wildest one.
Khoa Vu tweet media
English
16
6
342
21.8K
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
(By the way--I'm mostly on the other site now. My username there is my website URL. Same profile pic.)
English
0
0
0
65
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
There are links to the paper and many more resources for FETWFE on the GitHub page. Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback! github.com/gregfaletto/fe…
English
1
0
0
72
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
So, in my opinion, FETWFE has the best of both worlds: what we like about classical estimators (simple to use, asymptotically valid inference) and ML methods (flexible, adapts to your data to get the best possible estimates).
English
1
0
0
78
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
It gets better--unlike many ML methods, the FETWFE estimates are asymptotically Gaussian, so you can get standard errors and valid confidence intervals. It's also relatively simple to implement--it only has a single tuning parameter.
English
1
0
0
60
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
FETWFE uses machine learning to figure out which of these restrictions are okay to keep around and which aren't. By learning from the data which restrictions are justified and which aren't, FETWFE preserves unbiasedness while improving efficiency as much as possible.
Greg Faletto tweet media
English
1
0
2
67
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
This ensures unbiasedness regardless of whether the restrictions hold, but at a steep price to efficiency. Probably the TE for cohort 3 at time 4 has a lot to do with the TE for cohort 3 at time 5. Most of the new methods discard that information.
English
2
0
1
70
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
This can also be seen as a large number of small homogeneity assumptions, or restrictions (the TE for cohort 3 at time 3 equals the TE at time 4 AND at time 5 AND...) The newer estimators drop all these restrictions.
English
1
0
0
74
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
Here's an explainer of what FETWFE brings to the table and why I think you should consider {fetwfe} instead of other estimators: TWFE is perfectly fine under staggered adoptions IF (and only if) a strong assumption on homogeneity of treatment effects holds.
English
1
0
0
71
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
Here's the complete code for the data application from my paper. FETWFE is one of the many new estimators that is unbiased for difference-in-differences with staggered adoptions (unlike the classic two-way fixed effects estimator).
Greg Faletto tweet media
English
1
0
0
112
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
github.com/gregfaletto/fe… {fetwfe} is really easy to get started with. Just provide a panel data set (formatted as described in the documentation), and you'll get an estimate of the overall ATT, the ATT for each cohort, and standard errors for all of these.
English
1
0
1
316
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
NEW R PACKAGE: I created the {fetwfe} package to implement fused extended two-way fixed effects (FETWFE), my estimator for difference-in-difference under staggered adoptions. Link to GitHub and short thread below:
English
1
5
21
3.2K
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
@otis_reid Yes it's been largely forgotten but there was a theory in the late 2000s that the only way to save the music industry from piracy was to make legal streaming more convenient (and affordable) and Spotify basically proved it right
English
0
0
3
54
Otis Reid
Otis Reid@otis_reid·
This chart of the sources of music industry revenue also is super interesting — for all its faults, streaming has saved the industry
Otis Reid tweet media
English
3
2
35
1.8K
Otis Reid
Otis Reid@otis_reid·
The cultural weight of the music industry relative to its financial size is pretty wild — it’s just a very small business
Otis Reid tweet media
English
12
43
424
40.7K
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
@asmartbear @tautologer And yes, that wealth can be partially tapped into in various ways without moving out. All I'm saying is that, one way or another, homeowners capture at best a fraction of the increase in the value of their home. First-time buyers feel every last penny. x.com/GregoryFaletto…
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto

@asmartbear @tautologer Point being, I think part of why the affordability side has had snowballing success is that in a very literal, dollars and cents way, new home buyers who want to keep housing costs down have more to gain than incumbent homeowners who want their investment to appreciate in value.

English
1
0
2
22
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
@asmartbear @tautologer Yes, the value doesn't evaporate at death. But if homeowners are thinking about what matters for their kids, the current state of affairs isn't great. Their kids can't buy a home now in their 20s/30s, it doesn't do a lot of good that one of them will inherit one in their 50s.
English
2
0
2
45
tautologer
tautologer@tautologer·
the fundamental contradiction at the heart of American politics is that housing costs can't go down while home values go up because they are the exact same thing
English
16
15
275
11.9K
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
@asmartbear @tautologer Point being, I think part of why the affordability side has had snowballing success is that in a very literal, dollars and cents way, new home buyers who want to keep housing costs down have more to gain than incumbent homeowners who want their investment to appreciate in value.
English
0
0
0
50
Greg Faletto
Greg Faletto@GregoryFaletto·
@asmartbear @tautologer Well in (a) the appreciation never meant anything to you, it was just paper wealth that stayed on paper until you died. So what did it matter? People do hope for (b). But of course everyone can't "beat the market," there can only be as many winners as there are losers.
English
2
0
2
58