David Packham

3.5K posts

David Packham banner
David Packham

David Packham

@GunnisonCap

Co-Founder & CEO at @ChintaiNetwork. Doing DeFi and RWA before both were buzzwords. The Real World Asset revolution will be tokenized. $CHEX 🥣

Katılım Mart 2018
281 Takip Edilen8.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
We’re going to just deliver in 2026 and let the results speak for themselves. This partnership is very exciting news for the network, and looks like several hundred million in buy side incoming already. This will be a year of determined focus and execution on the distribution layer, as well as deal flow like this.
David Packham tweet media
Chintai@ChintaiNetwork

Chintai and Maluku Archipelago Joint Venture (MAJV) to tokenise real-world assets tied to the venture's 60-year nature-based development project for the Maluku and North Maluku provinces of Indonesia, valued at USD 28 billion, one of the most significant issuances to date. prnewswire.com/news-releases/…

English
33
88
268
26.3K
Tuki
Tuki@TukiFromKL·
Do you understand what Google just did? > They released a CLI that gives AI agents direct access to your Gmail, your Calendar, your Google Drive, your Sheets and your Docs > This means an AI agent can now: Read your emails. Schedule your meetings. Organize your files. Edit your spreadsheets. Draft your docs. > Every "workflow automation" SaaS charging you $49/month just became a free npm install. Zapier is shaking. 💀
Addy Osmani@addyosmani

Introducing the Google Workspace CLI: github.com/googleworkspac… - built for humans and agents. Google Drive, Gmail, Calendar, and every Workspace API. 40+ agent skills included.

English
267
292
5.8K
1.4M
David Packham retweetledi
CZ 🔶 BNB
CZ 🔶 BNB@cz_binance·
Reality: Learn to use AI to the max, or be laid off.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
1.2K
920
8.1K
933.3K
David Packham retweetledi
a16z
a16z@a16z·
Ben Horowitz on the infrastructure behind the AI economy: "Crypto is the natural money for AI because it’s internet-native money." "AI is global. Crypto is global." "There needs to be not just a ledger of money, but probably a ledger of truth for AI to really fulfill its potential." "I think people are probably underestimating how crypto and AI work together to form the AI economy." "Networks and computers tend to grow together, and I think that AI is obviously a new kind of computer and crypto is a new kind of network." @bhorowitz on Moonshots with @PeterDiamandis
English
191
345
1.9K
233.6K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
Recent Jane Street revelations (if proven true) add colour to this. Above all it reveals a disturbing trend of cynical manipulation of asset prices, where the extraction of profit is primarily from retail. It may ironically be that AI agents are a solution as well as attack vector, in that they could provide defensive capabilities for a market both analytically and to counter a strategy like the so called 10am dump.
David Packham@GunnisonCap

Hard to disagree with this analysis: the price of BTC now feels as decoupled from reality as the gold market has for decades. So while scarcity and security are key, when the price discovery mechanism becomes this distorted, it may be we need to re-evaluate BTC predictions in light of this. It would certainly explain why we seem to have diverged so strongly from the prior cyclical patterns related to the halving.

English
9
2
49
2.4K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
@lmstudio Excited to give this a try, previous Qwen models have been very competitive
English
1
1
7
2.7K
LM Studio
LM Studio@lmstudio·
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is now available in LM Studio! This model outperforms previous Qwen models that are more than 6x its size 🤯🚀 Requires about ~21GB to run locally. lmstudio.ai/models/qwen/qw…
English
75
179
2.3K
329.1K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
This right here is the problem with crypto as an “industry”. The technological potential and merits of specific sectors and use cases are drowned out by the wider culture of grifting and toxicity.
Peter Steinberger 🦞@steipete

@samkazemian the tech is interesting and has merit. a very loud chunk of the culture around it is so toxic and damaging to the project and has been personally attacking me that I had to take strong measures to keep Discord a friendly place.

English
7
9
44
4.3K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
Anthropic absolutely self-mogged over the last month. Fumble of the cycle.
English
2
1
17
1.7K
Alex Cheema
Alex Cheema@alexocheema·
I’ll be honest, I have 32 mac minis. 3 more clusters like this one. Why? @jason thought my argument for local AI would be cost, but it’s much more than that. AI is becoming an extension of your brain, an exocortex. @openclaw is a huge leap towards that. It knows everything you know, it can do pretty much everything you can do. It’s personalised to you. That brings into question where this exocortex should run. who should own it? who can switch it off? I certainly won’t be trusting @sama or @DarioAmodei with my exocortex. I want to own it. I want to know if the model weights change. I don’t want my brain to be rate limited by a profit seeking corporation. “not your weights, not your brain” - @karpathy
Alex Cheema tweet media
This Week in Startups@twistartups

Have you been mass buying Mac Minis for your new @openclaw workflows? One man who skated to puck is @alexocheema, founder of @ExoLabs! He joins TWiST today to show @jason how his open source software helps users connect all of their Mac Minis. Check out how you can start running your own AI compute cluster!

English
366
346
3.9K
836.5K
David Packham retweetledi
Dylan Patel
Dylan Patel@dylan522p·
4% of GitHub public commits are being authored by Claude Code right now. At the current trajectory, we believe that Claude Code will be 20%+ of all daily commits by the end of 2026. While you blinked, AI consumed all of software development. Read more 👇 newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/claude-code-…
Dylan Patel tweet media
SemiAnalysis@SemiAnalysis_

Claude Code is the Inflection Point, What It Is, How We Use It, Industry Repercussions, Microsoft's Dilemma, Why Anthropic Is Winning. newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/claude-code-…

English
203
552
4K
1.1M
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
@kunoo @coinbase Same with Kraken, it’s openly fleecing retail and completely indefensible.
English
1
0
12
5K
kuno
kuno@kunoo·
If you convert $5,000 of USDT to USD on Coinbase there’s a $137.50 fee. If you go to advanced trade (USDT/USD) and market sell it’s like 2 cents. This is dumb @coinbase
kuno tweet media
English
301
189
4.9K
503K
Detgrim
Detgrim@Detgrim1·
@GunnisonCap @chriseyin @openclaw I’ve got a mate who’s working on a framework to help fix this issue. I’ve used it myself and it’s pretty crazy! He’s close to releasing the beast too. Could be a game changer.
English
1
0
0
96
Chris Yin
Chris Yin@chriseyin·
.@openclaw is legitimately very interesting and cool but 80% of my openclaw work is about openclaw itself vs the work would like to see it inverted soon 2 weeks in and lots of futzing, feels like it's almost there but we will see
English
11
4
64
8.2K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
Check the number of tokens feeding into the model off a simple message like “hello, please respond back with ‘message received’” and if it’s 20-40k+ you could find your workspace folder has got crap added that’s firing into the model for every single interaction. A clear out of that and reinstall might actually be the quickest path to getting back to responsiveness for now. Also, assuming you’ve got a model plugged in with good tool handling and instructional capabilities. Some models like DeepSeek coder didnt work at all well for me with OpenClaw.
English
0
0
8
481
Hanzo ㊗️
Hanzo ㊗️@DeFi_Hanzo·
My ClawdBot is retarded > Not listeting to me > Constant erros (the number of them is expanding) > Slow responses > Leaving the task in the middle of doing it > Literally doing 0 task properly as it supposed to do Any advice from here? What could I've done wrong?
Hanzo ㊗️ tweet media
English
200
2
228
39.4K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
Hard to disagree with this analysis: the price of BTC now feels as decoupled from reality as the gold market has for decades. So while scarcity and security are key, when the price discovery mechanism becomes this distorted, it may be we need to re-evaluate BTC predictions in light of this. It would certainly explain why we seem to have diverged so strongly from the prior cyclical patterns related to the halving.
Bob Kendall (The Kendall Report)@PortfolioXpert

So here’s the issue you get influencers like this guy have a quarter million followers and they claim they don’t know why it is declining… it’s because they don’t understand basic mechanics of price discovery. They don’t understand that the marginal buyers or the float determines price they think the onchain bitcoin is that is the price discovery Well, it was once upon a time but now.. Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market. This is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin. This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated. The original premise that no longer exists Bitcoin’s entire valuation logic was built on finite supply (21M) and inability to be rehypothecated. That died the moment: •Cash-settled futures •Perpetual swaps •Options •ETFs •Prime broker lending •Wrapped BTC •Total return swaps were layered on top of the chain. From that moment forward: Bitcoin supply became theoretically infinite. Not on-chain in price discovery. The metric that explains the collapse Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR) Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce — and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market. That is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin. This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated. Why Wall Street can now “trade against” Bitcoin They do exactly what they’ve done in every commodity market: 1.Create unlimited paper BTC 2.Short into rallies 3.Force liquidations 4.Cover lower 5.Repeat They are not “betting” — they are manufacturing inventory. The same 1 BTC can now support: •An ETF unit •A futures contract •A perpetual swap •An options delta •A broker loan •A structured note All at once. That is six claims on one coin. That is not a market. That is a fractional reserve price system.

English
4
4
44
6.5K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
@aakashgupta It also makes locally running a model with OpenClaw challenging just because of the amount of unnecessary noise being sent through in input tokens. Can frequently max v cache and lead to a full model restart. To be fair it’s very early days.
English
0
0
9
1.3K
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
This data doesn’t say “Kimi is the best model.” OpenClaw burns through tokens like nothing else in the AI ecosystem. The platform sends your entire conversation history with every single API call. Users report hitting 200,000+ tokens of cached context on routine queries. One developer burned $500 in a weekend. Another watched a single cron job consume $128/month in tokens. So what happened? OpenClaw users did what any rational economic actor does when the meter is running at 5.7 million tokens overnight: they switched to the cheapest model that still works. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $15. That’s 25x cheaper. When your AI agent is re-sending 200K tokens of session history on every heartbeat check, every status ping, every “what’s on my calendar” query, that 25x multiplier is the only number that matters. The OpenRouter leaderboard doesn’t measure which model developers love most. It measures which model developers can afford to leave running 24/7 inside the most token-hungry platform ever built. Kimi is winning the “my agent won’t bankrupt me” war. Quality is secondary when your platform re-sends 200K tokens on every ping. The entire OpenClaw community knows it. The top thread in their GitHub discussions is literally titled “Burning through tokens” with users begging each other for cheaper alternatives. Moonshot AI is celebrating a vanity metric. The real story is that OpenClaw created a token-burning architecture so aggressive that it single-handedly reshuffled the model leaderboard by cost, and Kimi happened to be standing in the right spot.
Kimi.ai@Kimi_Moonshot

Kimi is now the #1 used model on OpenClaw (via OpenRouter) 🏆 Real usage data doesn't lie. Developers are voting with their tokens.

English
113
35
578
98K
Trenton Scott
Trenton Scott@SonicAgamemnon·
@ChintaiNexus Thanks to Matthew for hosting the AMA! The $CHEX community appreciates David and Rick taking time out of their busy schedule to answer the community's top 10 questions while providing valuable context🖖 Visit chextoken.com
Trenton Scott tweet media
English
4
15
63
1.3K
David Packham
David Packham@GunnisonCap·
@Alibaba_Qwen Efficient models that can locally power agents are the real game changer this year. Amazing job 🔥
English
0
0
12
778
Qwen
Qwen@Alibaba_Qwen·
🚀 Introducing Qwen3-Coder-Next, an open-weight LM built for coding agents & local development. What’s new: 🤖 Scaling agentic training: 800K verifiable tasks + executable envs 📈 Efficiency–Performance Tradeoff: achieves strong results on SWE-Bench Pro with 80B total params and 3B active ✨ Supports OpenClaw, Qwen Code, Claude Code, web dev, browser use, Cline, etc 🤗 Hugging Face: huggingface.co/collections/Qw… 🤖 ModelScope: modelscope.cn/collections/Qw… 📝 Blog: qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3-… 📄 Tech report: github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-C…
Qwen tweet media
English
213
805
5.7K
1.5M