Uncle gwei2high.hl
46.3K posts

Uncle gwei2high.hl
@GweiGweiGwei
HAPPINESS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN NET WORTH. ALL SCORE CARDS ARE INTERNAL. HYPERLIQUID FOREVER OR CRYPTO DIES!










markets just closed… you know what time it is








I've been thinking about the state of launchpads, especially in regards to @printr, and have some thoughts. We've been through several iterations of 'Pump fun killers' before, and all have failed largely for two reasons. Firstly, these launchpads mainly positioned themselves as something to 'take on' Pump, which IMO, as the incumbent with huge mindshare, the attention economy, and being the most successful crypto app ever made, is not a wise model to make the core of your business. Printr, as far as I can see, is not doing this, which is a major green flag directionally. See their recent ETH launchpad rollout as evidence here. Secondly, these launchpads live or die by the tokens launched on them. Attracting devs away from PF, with its current rewards system and all of the volume, is basically impossible unless heavily incentivised. For Printr to be successful long-term, it needs more of these teams to deploy tokens on the platform, but IMO it needs to push for this to occur outside of just the platform rewards themselves. If I was theory-crafting a solution to this problem, I would directly incentivise teams that run coins to X market cap and sustain there for X amount of time, with flat-fee payments for launching on the platform. Basically KPI the process. You could even run an incentive campaign where people who find the best teams and bring them to the platform are given a flat-fee payout, or whatever structure works best there. Treat it like hiring the best talent for whatever sports team fits this analogy, but do it with the best devs. Sure, this is hard to filter for, but let money talk and establish a baseline in terms of coins that have run to a certain market cap (and sustained) to network-effect the token launch process. Also, I would heavily suggest not starting with Solana. Most people are omni-chain these days, bridging is simple, and there's far less friction moving between ecosystems. Moreover, a sol vs sol narrative is inherently weaker because you're always competing directly with the incumbent. An omni-chain launchpad that consistently produces runners on a separate chain is an entirely different conversation (and a sellable narrative). I hope this resonates. I am pushing for printr to cut through the noise/fud here.




they said HyperEVM was dead. we just distributed the largest HYPE airdrop in its history. $200,000. Weekly. Ongoing. HYPE.


proud to introduce @papertrade_xyz - a fair-launched, fully-onchain perpetuals exchange built on hyperliquid by @izebel_eth & @blurr -1000x leverage -0 slippage -No funding costs -Self-bootstrapping LP coming soon. learn more at: docs.papertrade.xyz




