H Rahman

@Pepe733745533 The USmarines are the real terrorsts. So, logically, those on the other side cannot be terrorsts.

In 1983, Mossad received specific intel from an informant: Shiite terrorists were fitting a large Mercedes truck with massive bomb compartments, clearly targeting the US Marine barracks in Beirut. Mossad chief Admony was asked whether to warn the Americans with details. His reply: “No, we’re not there to protect Americans. They’re a big country. Send only the regular information.” On October 23 1983, the truck smashed into the US barracks, killing 241 American Marines. Minutes later, another truck hit the French paratroopers HQ, killing 58 more. Mossad had warned its own people to watch for that exact truck. Americans received only a vague general warning. When ex Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky questioned it, he was told: “Just shut up. We’re giving the Americans much more than they’re giving us.” Internally, Mossad was relieved it wasn’t them and said “let them pay the price.” From: By Way of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, pp. 321 & 322. PDF: drive.google.com/file/d/1-Zd3t5…

@InvestorOfJAMMU @grok Can we have less (a lot less!!) of tanatanism and more of progressivism to build a powerful Indian economy? What he advocates has already been tried and spectacularly failed.

Uday Kotak calls for ‘more Brahma and Mahesh, less Vishnu’ to build a powerful Indian economy. @grok what is the meaning?

@CuteAaruhi4 Your profile pic seems to indicate you are a lindu vvhore. Language is irrelevant here. Tamil people are cool.

I’m a Tamil Hindu, and Joseph Vijay is not my CM.

@chixxsays With hordes of lindu cockroaches like you, aka the demographic curse, the nation was screwed since long.

There is no difference between Congress and BJP. Congress destroyed this nation for 60 years and now BJP is doing the same.

@VVVStockAnalyst Andhchutiya spotted.😂

Singapore PM also says the same Modi told a few days ago. "Be prepared for the bad times that could come ahead" Mature & Prepared people tell you ahead of time, this is called maturity, criticising one of the most able PM's of our times is all that haters can do. I think India & Indians would be at such a bad state without the leadership of Modi & his team. I really think he receives more hate than he deserves, inspite of his really revolutionary work picking India up in the order in almost everything.

@dystopianzzz Nah, it is just that rabid lindu m/ffers hate Muslims more than they love their own family and well being. They are willing fck their entire society as long as they can tight the mvlla. Lage raho harami ki aulaad.

have a convo with a leftist and you'll understand why BJP keeps winning in this country

@Countcristo44 “Superman” with 75iq, like all the cockroaches who watch such mindless slop.

Saar-perman (Indian Superman) saves a baby from a predatory train.

@Haji_Nayab_786 Ek gora lindu suar, anek kaale lindu suar.

What exactly is going on here? Can anyone explain? Personally, I can't make heads or tails of it.🤔🤔 #HimantaBiswaSarma

@Muslim_ITCell A savage society of godless animals.

UP Monster Cheers Israeli Massacre in Gaza While Bragging About Killing 4 Muslims on Live Stream. This Uttar Pradesh resident didn’t just support Israel, he openly celebrated the killings of Muslims in Gaza… and then dropped a bombshell confession: “I have killed almost 4 Muslims.” Live. On camera. Zero guilt. All while praising the forces destroying Gaza. A self-confessed murderer walking freely in UP. How many more such hidden killers are being shielded?

@krazyrabbi @RnaudBertrand @Selkis_2028 I don’t know the future, and who will prevail in this generational fight between absolute satanic evil of your Westein curse-on-mankind society on the one side, or Iran on the other. All I pray for is for God to curse the greatsatan and evil animals like you.

Robert Kagan, the Atlantic’s resident foreign policy doomsayer and professional Iraq War enthusiast, just dropped his latest “America is finished” manifesto: the U.S. is “checkmated” in Iran after a 37-day campaign that apparently killed half their leadership, wrecked their military, and left them begging for a blockade instead of more bombs. Checkmated? Bro, that’s not chess. That’s you watching your opponent get their king punched off the board, then screaming “actually you lost because you didn’t also burn the entire board and bankrupt yourself doing it!” Here’s the clown logic in full: • You bomb Iran’s military command into the afterlife for over a month. • You have total air and sea supremacy. • Their economy is already a flaming tire fire. • Trump stops short of turning the Strait of Hormuz into a permanent no-go zone that spikes oil to $200 and sends global inflation into orbit. • Result according to Kagan: Irreversible defeat. America now looks “unreliable.” Iran is suddenly a superpower. Russia and China are giggling. The world order collapses. This is the geopolitical equivalent of declaring the guy who just won the fight “checkmated” because he chose not to also light his own house on fire for dramatic effect. Kagan’s greatest hits include: • “Iraq will be easy and transformative!” • “More troops will fix Afghanistan!” • And now: “Not turning the Persian Gulf into an environmental and economic apocalypse is actually weakness.” The man has the strategic foresight of a goldfish with a Neocon subscription. The real tell? The article’s own evidence contradicts the thesis. Iran suppressed protests? Cool, so did the Soviet Union until it didn’t. The regime “survived” 37 days of getting its face rearranged? That’s not resilience, that’s a cockroach surviving a nuke and then claiming victory because the building is still standing. And the “lasting consequences unlike any America has endured”? Please. We’ve had actual losses — Vietnam, Afghanistan, the 1970s. This is the U.S. (with Israel) dismantling a terror-sponsoring theocracy’s military in weeks and then choosing not to occupy it like it’s 2003 again. The horror. The tweet is just The Atlantic doing what it does best: fear-mongering for clicks while pretending it’s serious analysis. “The U.S. is checkmated… lasting consequences unlike any before…” — translation: “Trump didn’t start World War III and we’re mad about it.” Final verdict: This isn’t journalism. It’s a neoconservative tantrum dressed up in chess metaphors. Kagan and his friends have been predicting America’s imminent collapse for decades while the actual country keeps winning the big ones and learning from the stupid ones. The only thing truly checkmated here is Robert Kagan’s credibility. Again.

There’s no overstating how extraordinary this Atlantic article is, given the author and the outlet. As a reminder Bob Kagan is: - The co-founder of Project for the New American Century, probably the single most imperialist Think Tank in Washington (which is quite a feat) - A man who spent his entire life advocating for American military interventions, especially in the Middle East, and a vocal advocate of the Iraq war. He started advocating for intervention in Iraq before 9/11, which speaks for itself... - The husband of Victoria Nuland, an extremely hawkish former senior U.S. official (a key architect of U.S. policy in Ukraine, with the consequences we all witness today) - The brother of Frederick Kagan, one of the key architects of the Iraq surge In other words, we ain’t exactly looking at some sort of anti-imperialist peacenik. This is quite literally the guy Dick Cheney called when he needed a pep talk. And the man is writing in The Atlantic, the most reliably pro-war mainstream media outlet in the U.S. (also quite a feat). So when HE writes that the U.S. “suffered a total defeat” in Iran that has no precedent in U.S. history and can “neither be repaired nor ignored,” it’s the functional equivalent of Ronald McDonald telling you the burgers aren’t great: it means the burgers really, really aren't great. Extraordinarily (and somewhat worryingly, for me), his arguments for why this is such a defeat are virtually the same as those I laid out in my article “The First Multipolar War” last month (open.substack.com/pub/arnaudbert…). Here they are 👇 1) Vietnam/Afghanistan were survivable, this isn't He agrees that this war - and the U.S. defeat - is fundamentally different in nature from previous U.S. interventions. Where I wrote that the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan didn’t change the equation much in terms of power dynamics (“in the grand scheme of things, the giant walked away with little more than a bruised ego”), Kagan writes that “the defeats in Vietnam and Afghanistan were costly but did not do lasting damage to America's overall position in the world.” And when I wrote that “it’s painfully obvious that the Iran war is of a qualitatively different nature” from these, he writes that “defeat in the present confrontation with Iran will be of an entirely different character.” Same point. 2) Iran will never relinquish Hormuz and uses it as selective leverage When I wrote that Iran has turned “freedom of navigation” on its head by establishing “a permission-based regime” through the Strait of Hormuz, Kagan arrives at the same conclusion: “Iran will be able not only to demand tolls for passage, but to limit transit to those nations with which it has good relations.” He also agrees that “Iran has no interest in returning to the status quo ante,” when I myself cited Iran’s parliament speaker Ghalibaf in my article, saying: “The Strait of Hormuz situation won’t return to its pre-war status.” Same point and virtually the same words. 3) Gulf states will have to accommodate Iran He agrees that most Gulf states will have no choice but to accommodate Iran, effectively making Iran into a, if not THE, dominant regional power. Kagan writes “the United States will have proved itself a paper tiger, forcing the Gulf and other Arab states to accommodate Iran.” On my end, I wrote that “the Gulf monarchies will eventually have to choose between two security propositions. One where they stay aligned with a distant superpower that [can’t protect them]. The other proposition being: make peace with the regional power that just proved it can hit [them] whenever it wants.” Which is not much of a choice… 4) Military impossibility to reopen Hormuz Kagan writes that “if the United States with its mighty Navy can't or won't open the strait, no coalition of forces with just a fraction of the Americans' capability will be able to, either.” On my end, in my article I cited Germany’s defense minister Boris Pistorius: “What does Trump expect a handful of European frigates to do that the powerful US Navy cannot?” The exact same argument. 5) Global chain reaction Kagan agrees that this is a global strategic failure that fundamentally changes the U.S.’s position in the world. As he puts it: “America's once-dominant position in the Gulf is just the first of many casualties… America's allies in East Asia and Europe must wonder about American staying power in the event of future conflicts.” You’ll have guessed it, I wrote essentially the same thing: “Think about what it says if you’re Saudi Arabia, quietly watching your American-built defenses fail to protect your own refineries. Or any European country now facing the worst energy shock since 1973, caused not by your enemy but by your ally, and realizing that said ‘ally,’ supposedly in charge of ‘protecting’ you, couldn’t even protect Israel’s most strategic sites - when it’s the country with which it’s joined at the hip. I’m not even speaking about China or Russia who are seeing their worldview being validated on almost every axis simultaneously.” 6) Weapons stocks depleted, credibility shattered Kagan: “just a few weeks of war with a second-rank power have reduced American weapons stocks to perilously low levels, with no quick remedy in sight.” Me: “America’s most advanced weapons systems are much more vulnerable than previously thought - not theoretically, but in actual combat.” Kagan: “America's allies… must wonder about American staying power in the event of future conflicts.” Me: “The U.S. security guarantee has been empirically falsified in real time.” ----------- So, yup, Bob Kagan and I agree on nearly everything. I need a shower 🤢 Reassuringly though, we still differ on a few fundamental aspects. First of all, arguably the most important one, the moral aspect. In typical neocon fashion, his article contains not a word about the human cost of this war - not the 165 schoolgirls, not the devastation inflicted on Iranians during 37 days of bombing, not the toll this war is taking on the entire world through its devastating economic consequences (the economic devastation on ordinary people worldwide is referenced only as a political problem for Trump). For him, this is purely a strategic chess problem, morality and people don’t figure in his mental map. For me, the moral bankruptcy of this war isn't separate from the strategic failure - it is the strategic failure. Much like Gaza can only be a failure because of its sheer abjectness. Secondly, there is not an instant of reflection in the article on how we got there. Which is unsurprising because he personally, alongside his wife, his brother, and every co-signatory of every PNAC letter, spent a generation pushing for exactly this kind of confrontation. The man spend 30 years advocating for military dominance in the Middle East and hostility towards Iran, thereby forging them as an adversary and facilitating this very war that he now says has “checkmated” America. I know introspection has never been the neocon forte but at some point you have to stop setting houses on fire and then writing op-eds about how surprising the smoke is. Last but not least, we differ on what should be done. This is the funniest part of Kagan’s article - showing that the man is decidedly beyond salvation. On one hand he calls this a “checkmate” by Iran, and a U.S. defeat that can “neither be repaired nor ignored,” yet an the other hand his solution for it is… surprise, surprise… a bigger war still! He writes that what’s to be done is “engage in a full-scale ground and naval war to remove the current Iranian regime, and then to occupy Iran until a new government can take hold.” The arsonist's solution to the fire is a bigger fire ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ For my end, this was the conclusion of my previous article: "There is almost a Greek tragedy quality to U.S. actions lately where every move taken to escape one’s fate becomes the mechanism that delivers it. The U.S. went to war to reassert dominance - and proved it could no longer dominate. It demanded allies send warships - and revealed it had no real allies. It waged forty years of maximum pressure to break Iran before this moment came - and instead forged the very adversary now capable of meeting it. It started the war in part to have additional leverage over China - and handed the world the spectacle of begging China for help. The prophecy was multipolarity. Every American action to prevent it reveals it instead." I wouldn’t change a word. The only thing that's changed since I wrote it is that even the arsonists now smell the smoke. Src for the Atlantic article: theatlantic.com/international/…

@RajC_arts000 @Sarcaztick But mfing lindu cockroaches like you will always get sh!t on by your own elites. If that is amrut for you, usse bhi chato haramiyon😁

@Sarcaztick We will raise questions on nta yet be proudly islamophobic you mothafoka.... Tujhe kya lga tu apna narrative chla lega is aad me?

Are uncle Neet weet hota rahega pehle thoda Islamophobia karlo aur Mullo ki chudi tight karwalo.

@ShahuPa38884976 @Sarcaztick Fck you lindumfer. Knowing who you rabid lowlifes are, she must have cheated… allegedly.😁 x.com/Sarcaztick/sta…

@Sarcaztick Madam, my daughter was getting 672 as per NTA answer key. What if she gets less marks in re-examination, she will be devastated . why should everybody give a re-examination? Why not catch the culprits and cancel their scores? Lakhs paying for the sins of maybe a few hundred.???

One student who scored 695/720 in Neet is literally crying as he has to reappear for the Neet again. His parents are big BJP supporter.

@badjourno Bro, which blessed car gives 14km/l within the city?

Decided to be a good citizen. Inspired by PM’s call for austerity, left the car at home. Auto to the Metro station: ₹30. Metro ticket: ₹30. Feeder bus for the last stretch: ₹20. Total one way: ₹80. Return journey: another ₹80. Grand daily total: ₹160. My car gives 14 kilometres to a litre. Office is 7 kilometres from home. Roughly ₹100 a day, door to door, including the petrol and the quiet dignity of arriving without fuss. Public transport, in other words, costs me ₹60 more than driving myself. Per day. In a city with a functioning Metro. This is what we call last-mile connectivity gap — the small, unglamorous gap between the grand infrastructure and your actual front door. Austerity, apparently, is for the commuter alone. The PM travels by motorcade. The last I checked.

@SimonGrunchy @realstewpeters With such unthinking mfers like you, Isntreal sure has it easy milking your accursed nation dry. May God curse the greatsatan.

@realstewpeters Financial situations? What price Freedom, you traitorous Tosser? Robert Morris was a key financier of the American Revolutionary War who ultimately went bankrupt after the war due to his extensive personal investments in financing the Continental Army.

REPORTER: “When you’re negotiating with Iran, to what extent are Americans’ financial situations motivating you to make a deal? TRUMP: “Not even a little bit. I don't think about Americans’ financial situation” Here’s Trump telling Americans to go fuck themselves again.