HabitualLinestepper

82.2K posts

HabitualLinestepper banner
HabitualLinestepper

HabitualLinestepper

@HabitualLinest

RedPill Catholicism & Brutal Conservatism/ Arrogant Dbag https://t.co/C9GF2eU0RZ

Katılım Nisan 2023
1.6K Takip Edilen4.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
TESTING PROTESTANTISM I think I'll start a regular series on testing the claims of Protestants and Protestantism. Rule #1 for Protestants: You can't refer to the Catholic Church at all. Your theology has to stand on its own. Your theology is being tested.
English
21
21
166
17.3K
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
@BaptistClips It must be physically painful for Protestants to actually read the Bible rather than cherry pick it
HabitualLinestepper tweet media
English
0
0
1
4
Baptist Clips
Baptist Clips@BaptistClips·
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus 1 Timothy 2:5
Deacon Don Keane@donaldkeane

@BaptistClips We don’t worship saints. We pray to God, through them, It ain’t hard to get this Mind you, if you don’t get your facts correct then it’s no wonder your post was a piece of nonsense.

English
31
0
15
3.2K
Jenny Wakefield
Jenny Wakefield@JennyWakefiel12·
We are commanded to expose anti-biblical teaching.
The Bible In Context@BibleInContext1

The idea that Christians should never publicly confront false teaching sounds loving on the surface, but it directly contradicts repeated commands in Scripture. The Bible does not teach silent tolerance toward doctrinal error. It teaches discernment, correction, warning, and protecting the flock from deception. “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;” — Ephesians 5:11 The biblical command is not merely avoidance, it is exposure. Pastors and Teachers Must Refute Error “holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, so that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict.” — Titus 1:9 Biblical leadership includes refuting false doctrine. The Apostles Publicly Named False Teachers Paul publicly named men spreading error: “Among these are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan, so that they will be taught not to blaspheme.” — 1 Timothy 1:20 “Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who have gone astray from the truth…” — 2 Timothy 2:17–18 The apostles did not treat false teaching as untouchable. Believers Are Commanded to Contend for the Faith “I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.” — Jude 3 You cannot “contend earnestly” for truth while remaining silent about error. Paul explicitly tells Christians to identify and avoid those teaching contrary doctrine. Romans 16:17 Elders Are Required to Protect the Church “Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock… I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock.” — Acts 20:28–29 Protecting believers from deception is part of biblical ministry. Biblically: We expose error. We defend truth. We warn others. We do it with Scripture, honesty, and humility. Even Paul the Apostle publicly rebuked Peter when the gospel was compromised: “But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face…” — Galatians 2:11 Roman Catholicism is not biblical Christianity and Roman Catholics are not our brothers and sisters in Christ. Roman Catholicism is a counterfeit apostate Christianity that operates like a cult and the occult with its Babylonian pagan rituals. Catholics need the gospel, not our blind acceptance!

English
8
5
28
1.1K
Jenny Wakefield
Jenny Wakefield@JennyWakefiel12·
@23wjohnston We are commanded by God to read, study, and memorize his word. He never tells us to go through a mediator first. Do you not believe in the Spirit? John 16:13 You are aware that Rome has only “interpreted” a few verses, right?
English
2
0
0
43
Sean Michael
Sean Michael@GameOvRMan·
@SWT_Channel The Last Jedi is the best Star Wars movie since Empire and it’s not even remotely close.
English
12
0
9
1.6K
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
1. Luke leaves a map to find him and then claims he didn't want to be found 2. They can't catch a wounded ship in space, even though they can go hyperdrive. 3. Refuse to tell Poe the plan for no reason 4. Escape to casino planet for no reason 5. Luke creates a diversion for them to escape but doesn't tell them to escape 6. Luke wants to murder his nephew for things he might do, even though he redeemed his father who murdered billions 7. Mary Sue translates Chewbacca to Luke 8. Bombs dropping in space 9. The Republic is smaller than the First Order which just lost an entire planet of soldiers and equipment Would you like more?
English
0
0
1
11
Pastor Rick Brennan
Pastor Rick Brennan@rickbrennanjr·
The Roman Catholic backlash to @gavinortlund and @WesleyLHuff has been instructive. Both men are irenic, careful, and respectful in how they address what they believe are errors in Roman Catholic doctrine. Yet both have drawn deeply personal attacks for their apologetic work. This raises an important question many Protestants are asking: why do thoughtful, respectful critiques of Roman Catholicism often provoke such a visceral response? The visceral reaction many Catholics have when Rome is challenged makes sense once we understand the Roman Catholic system. Rome is not merely one church among others in their theology. It is the visible institution possessing the fullness of the means of salvation, the sacramental economy, the authentic interpretation of Scripture and Tradition, and the Petrine office of universal authority. Therefore, to challenge Rome is not received as a mere doctrinal disagreement. Rather, it is received as an attack on the what they believe is the very structure by which Christ supposedly teaches, governs, absolves, and saves. In contrast, Protestants are less threatened by challenges to a particular church tradition because Protestantism, at its best, does not locate salvation in institutional submission. The Baptist does not need the Baptist church to be indefectible. The Presbyterian does not need every presbytery to be incapable of grave error. The Lutheran does not need Wittenberg to be the necessary center of visible unity. Protestants argue fiercely, but their assurance rests finally in Christ’s finished work received by faith, not in the claim that one visible hierarchy or institution uniquely dispenses the fullness of saving grace. That is the real issue: Rome’s authority claims make historical criticism an existential threat. Protestantism can admit that church history is messy because the visible Church is always in need of reform. Protestants can also recognize ambiguity in the historical record and draw reasoned conclusions that differ from others without collapsing the faith. Rome cannot do this so easily. If too much historical complexity is admitted, Rome’s claim to be the indefectible guardian and interpreter of the apostolic deposit begins to weaken. History must produce clear answers because Rome must show that she has always taught what she now requires believers to confess—whether baptismal regeneration, Eucharistic transubstantiation, or papal supremacy. If the historical record shows change, ambiguity, contradiction, or later accretion rather than apostolic continuity, the entire sacerdotal system is threatened. So when a Roman Catholic lashes out at a protestant theologian or historian who is making an argument that runs counter to the approved narrative, the issue is often deeper than the topic being debated. The Protestant is arguing about history or doctrine. The Catholic may feel that their whole edifice of certainty, grace, authority, and salvation is being pulled down. And in a sense, the Catholic is right to feel critical importance of the stakes. If Rome is wrong about herself, then she is not merely wrong about secondary matters. She is wrong about the very place she has assigned herself between Christ and the believer.
Pastor Rick Brennan tweet media
English
89
65
407
63.8K
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
1. Women are absolutely consuming porn, both in video and book format 2. One of the top "romance" books out right now is about bestiality 3. Remember the "romance" movie where the old woman died and went to "heaven" and was greeted by her one-time bad boy fling rather than her husband of 60 years? 4. A large % of "romance" movies involve hypergamy and monkey branching. Where the lead character finally discovers her boyfriend of several years "was never really the one" and "she always knew something was off". She only discovered this when the new exciting guy enters her life. 5. Women are keeping a "roster" of guys to sleep with so they will buy them things and give them the attention they crave 6. Instagram is an addiction for women
Natania Marshall ✞@NataniaMarshall

Women are watching romantic movies. Men are consuming porn. This is why dating is so dysfunctional.

English
34
249
2.7K
82.6K
gingerX
gingerX@Ginger_xe·
The exhaustion of being a mom and a wife🥲🤧 it's two different responsibilities
English
277
436
4.5K
4.5M
Jenny Wakefield
Jenny Wakefield@JennyWakefiel12·
My question was “How can someone be saved?” Romans always avoid answering this question, but it is the most important question for mankind. If they were there church, their sole purpose would be answering this question.
English
14
0
8
649
HabitualLinestepper retweetledi
Oilfield Rando
Oilfield Rando@Oilfield_Rando·
Just tried to call a local hotel, not a chain. After a long hold, someone in India answers. Tells me I need to call the hotel front desk. Gives me the number I just called. Our country can’t survive without this, you see.
English
184
1.3K
17.6K
317K
A person in the web
A person in the web@cedie_ii44635·
@CombatJoe1010 @JennyWakefiel12 Wait wait. So instead of the arc being about JESUS, instead of her being blessed because she’s carrying JESUS, instead of the Davidic line being about JESUS We should go to her?? That makes sense to yall?
English
1
0
0
15