HabitualLinestepper

82.2K posts

HabitualLinestepper banner
HabitualLinestepper

HabitualLinestepper

@HabitualLinest

RedPill Catholicism & Brutal Conservatism/ Arrogant Dbag https://t.co/C9GF2eU0RZ

Katılım Nisan 2023
1.6K Takip Edilen4.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
TESTING PROTESTANTISM I think I'll start a regular series on testing the claims of Protestants and Protestantism. Rule #1 for Protestants: You can't refer to the Catholic Church at all. Your theology has to stand on its own. Your theology is being tested.
English
21
21
166
17.3K
Jenny Wakefield
Jenny Wakefield@JennyWakefiel12·
My question was “How can someone be saved?” Romans always avoid answering this question, but it is the most important question for mankind. If they were there church, their sole purpose would be answering this question.
English
14
0
8
620
HabitualLinestepper retweetledi
Oilfield Rando
Oilfield Rando@Oilfield_Rando·
Just tried to call a local hotel, not a chain. After a long hold, someone in India answers. Tells me I need to call the hotel front desk. Gives me the number I just called. Our country can’t survive without this, you see.
English
184
1.3K
17.5K
312.6K
A person in the web
A person in the web@cedie_ii44635·
@CombatJoe1010 @JennyWakefiel12 Wait wait. So instead of the arc being about JESUS, instead of her being blessed because she’s carrying JESUS, instead of the Davidic line being about JESUS We should go to her?? That makes sense to yall?
English
1
0
0
11
Jenny Wakefield
Jenny Wakefield@JennyWakefiel12·
@CombatJoe1010 No. The problem is your assuming the written word is NOT all of God’s revealed word to us. How do you validate anything extrabiblical as coming from God? You are trusting in someone who says “trust me….its from God”. You cannot verify any of it outside of scripture.
English
9
0
5
127
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
1. Women are absolutely consuming porn, both in video and book format 2. One of the top "romance" books out right now is about bestiality 3. Remember the "romance" movie where the old woman died and went to "heaven" and was greeted by her one-time bad boy fling rather than her husband of 60 years? 4. A large % of "romance" movies involve hypergamy and monkey branching. Where the lead character finally discovers her boyfriend of several years "was never really the one" and "she always knew something was off". She only discovered this when the new exciting guy enters her life. 5. Women are keeping a "roster" of guys to sleep with so they will buy them things and give them the attention they crave 6. Instagram is an addiction for women
Natania Marshall ✞@NataniaMarshall

Women are watching romantic movies. Men are consuming porn. This is why dating is so dysfunctional.

English
34
238
2.6K
81.2K
Pastor Rick Brennan
Pastor Rick Brennan@rickbrennanjr·
The Roman Catholic backlash to @gavinortlund and @WesleyLHuff has been instructive. Both men are irenic, careful, and respectful in how they address what they believe are errors in Roman Catholic doctrine. Yet both have drawn deeply personal attacks for their apologetic work. This raises an important question many Protestants are asking: why do thoughtful, respectful critiques of Roman Catholicism often provoke such a visceral response? The visceral reaction many Catholics have when Rome is challenged makes sense once we understand the Roman Catholic system. Rome is not merely one church among others in their theology. It is the visible institution possessing the fullness of the means of salvation, the sacramental economy, the authentic interpretation of Scripture and Tradition, and the Petrine office of universal authority. Therefore, to challenge Rome is not received as a mere doctrinal disagreement. Rather, it is received as an attack on the what they believe is the very structure by which Christ supposedly teaches, governs, absolves, and saves. In contrast, Protestants are less threatened by challenges to a particular church tradition because Protestantism, at its best, does not locate salvation in institutional submission. The Baptist does not need the Baptist church to be indefectible. The Presbyterian does not need every presbytery to be incapable of grave error. The Lutheran does not need Wittenberg to be the necessary center of visible unity. Protestants argue fiercely, but their assurance rests finally in Christ’s finished work received by faith, not in the claim that one visible hierarchy or institution uniquely dispenses the fullness of saving grace. That is the real issue: Rome’s authority claims make historical criticism an existential threat. Protestantism can admit that church history is messy because the visible Church is always in need of reform. Protestants can also recognize ambiguity in the historical record and draw reasoned conclusions that differ from others without collapsing the faith. Rome cannot do this so easily. If too much historical complexity is admitted, Rome’s claim to be the indefectible guardian and interpreter of the apostolic deposit begins to weaken. History must produce clear answers because Rome must show that she has always taught what she now requires believers to confess—whether baptismal regeneration, Eucharistic transubstantiation, or papal supremacy. If the historical record shows change, ambiguity, contradiction, or later accretion rather than apostolic continuity, the entire sacerdotal system is threatened. So when a Roman Catholic lashes out at a protestant theologian or historian who is making an argument that runs counter to the approved narrative, the issue is often deeper than the topic being debated. The Protestant is arguing about history or doctrine. The Catholic may feel that their whole edifice of certainty, grace, authority, and salvation is being pulled down. And in a sense, the Catholic is right to feel critical importance of the stakes. If Rome is wrong about herself, then she is not merely wrong about secondary matters. She is wrong about the very place she has assigned herself between Christ and the believer.
Pastor Rick Brennan tweet media
English
89
65
407
63.7K
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
The people who claim to be afraid of the police don't act like it at all
Giggling Ganon@GigglingGanon

Uber eats driver goes ballistic attacking police in a bank in Secaucus, NJ. ​The incident, involved 24-year-old delivery driver, Jahil Rust, started when she allegedly refused to confirm an Uber Eats delivery, leading to an argument with a customer. ​By the time local police arrived at the complex, Rust was on the phone refusing to fully interact with the officer and eventually fleeing the scene on her bicycle. Officers tracked her down near the intersection of 9th Street and Flanagan Way, but the situation quickly intensified when she refused to comply with lawful orders to stop. Attempting to elude the police after trying to hit one of them, Rust fled into a nearby TD Bank at 1262 Paterson Plank Road, pushing past staff and running behind the teller counter. ​As officers moved to take her into custody inside the bank, the encounter became chaotic. As can be seen in the body cam footage, Rust physically resisted and launched attacks on an officer, striking him in with multiple objects. ​Rust was subsequently taken into custody and charged with a long list of serious offenses, including: Aggravated ass@ult against a law enforcement officer. Aggravated ass@ult with a de@dly we@pon. Terroristic thre@ts Resisting arrest by force Burglary Possession of a we@pon for an unlawful purpose. As of May 2026 there is no trail update information available. The officer did sustain injuries from the attack that were treated after she was taken into custody. The worst part is, despite the seriousness of the charges on Rust, she was immediately released back into the streets under New Jersey's new bail reform program. You would think someone unhinged enough to attack police officers would be deemed a threat to the community and held without bail. ​This is the very definition of soft on crime policies.

English
0
0
1
33
HabitualLinestepper retweetledi
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
A Mom in Tulsa called 3 health systems last week asking the price of her son's tonsillectomy. Health system A: "We cannot quote you a price." Health system B: "Pricing depends on your insurance." Health system C: "Our financial counselor will reach out after the procedure." No other industry in America gets to operate this way. Imagine ordering at a restaurant and getting the bill six weeks after dinner.
English
242
2K
12K
232.6K
HabitualLinestepper retweetledi
Catholic Life
Catholic Life@prayandfast2·
"A stone does not reach its full potential until it is used for a church." - Rafael Morales (Catholic Architect)
Catholic Life tweet media
English
12
276
2.9K
21.4K
HabitualLinestepper retweetledi
HabitualLinestepper retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
That water clarity is an engineering decision, and the math behind it is wilder than the video. Roman aqueducts ran on gravity alone. No pumps, no pressure systems. Engineers carved channels with a gradient so shallow it borders on absurd. The Pont du Gard in southern France drops 2.5 centimeters over 275 meters. That's roughly the thickness of a coin over the length of three football fields. They surveyed that accuracy with plumb lines and wooden leveling instruments. The clarity you're seeing is a direct product of flow velocity. Too steep and the water erodes the channel walls, picks up sediment, turns brown. Too flat and it stagnates. Roman engineers targeted a slope of about 20 centimeters per kilometer, which kept the water moving fast enough to stay fresh but slow enough to stay clear. Before the water reached the city, it passed through multi-chamber settling tanks where velocity dropped near zero. Suspended particles sank. Clean water flowed out the top into the next chamber. Repeat three or four times. Pliny specified the minimum slope in writing. Vitruvius published the exact mortar ratio for hydraulic cement: one part lime to two parts volcanic ash for underwater work. The pozzolana from Pozzuoli reacted with water to form a calcium-aluminum-silicate compound that actually gets stronger the longer it sits submerged. Modern concrete degrades in water. Roman concrete bonds with it. Scale the whole system and it gets harder to process. Eleven aqueducts fed Rome at its peak. Combined output: roughly 1 million cubic meters of water per day. That works out to about 250 gallons per person for a city of one million. Modern New York delivers about 125 gallons per person per day. Ancient Rome had access to double the per capita water supply of the largest city in the United States, running entirely on slope and stone. The Trevi Fountain in Rome is still fed by one of them. Two thousand years, same source, same gravity, same water.
Ulises@UlisesDavid__

🚨| La claridad de un acueducto del imperio Romano, de hace 2000 años

English
687
10.5K
50.6K
2.6M
Timothy Saenz
Timothy Saenz@tjsaenzenglish·
@rickbrennanjr @HabitualLinest @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff I was Protestant for decades, including Presbyterian, Church of Christ, Pentecostal, etc. The Church of Christers have even split among themselves, the one cuppers/no missionaries from the others. You may have gone to different churches, me too, but that doesn't make them united.
English
1
0
1
12