

Hacash.com
192 posts

@HacashCom
BUILDING: The World’s 1st #Bitcoin Multi-Layer Multi-Chain Infra | A Bitcoin & Hacash Wallet #MoneyNex | $BTC 1-way Transfer Solution | https://t.co/NIQrLumgbH Research



[New Release v1.0.0] Resolved the issue where HACD bidding checks caused blocks to stoped, and additionally prepared technically for the Istanbul upgrade, testing the stability of the pre-release network. All miners and fullnodes need to upgrade. github.com/hacash/fullnod…

HACD Testnet is live. Built on @HacashCom's HVM, it provides the execution environment for HACD-native assets, contracts, and applications. 282 tests. 282 passed. 100% pass rate. From fractionalization to AMMs and stable pairs, explore real contract workflows around $HACD: testnet.hacd.it


@Kyro_Quick The more people who test it, the better.


There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

Currently, a version of GPU mining code has also been merged into the fullnode library. If want to use it in advance, please enable the "ocl" feature in Config.toml when compiling "poworker". Thanks to Ivan Martin for his contribution: github.com/hacash/fullnod…


AI is here. We should use it to look at Hacash from every angle with more objectivity, instead of relying only on our own biases and echo chambers. @one0000u new product is a great example of using AI to analyze Hacash on the technical level: web3tech.org/coins/hacash-d…

The "Istanbul Upgrade" integrates a variety of major technologies proposed and developed over the years, covering aspects such as asset issuance, contract construction, and programmability, including HIP-20, TDEX, AST, and HVM. Learn more: github.com/hacash/doc/blo…

HACDeveryTHING

📢 #BIT Space|AI 当道+Meme 横行,PoW 能不能重启算力信仰? 关于这个主题,你怎么看呢?评论区告诉我你的想法吧💡 嘉宾:@MissLoong1 @one0000u @pepchinese @YouKenTrust @rometheminer 🎁关注 @Bitcom_Asia ,点赞转发并参与 Space 互动有机会赢 50U! #BITPoWer 立即预约⬇️

#HACDLabs is thrilled to announce a strategic partnership with @HacashCom to co-develop a $HACD sidechain powered by the Hacash Virtual Machine (#HVM). This collaboration leverages the unique capabilities of #HVM to build a secure, scalable, and efficient sidechain for $HACD, enhancing the interoperability and functionality of the $HACD ecosystem. By combining #HACDLabs expertise in the HACD domain with @HacashCom cutting-edge technology, we aim to deliver a robust solution that empowers $HACD users and developers. Stay tuned for updates on our progress! Learn more about #HVM: hacash.com/HVM









