Jay Hackshaw

@FoxesAre_Cute @PorchYeller @erichovind Well I was an atheist most of my life but as I got older and thought more deeply about life, meaning and purpose so on. You have to at the very least step back and question it. What's the point of all this without something divine? Serious question.

@FoxesAre_Cute @PorchYeller @erichovind The argument of causation is a pretty strong argument. Something had to start all this. "Insert what ever at the beginning" ponder on why you even exist and soon you come to a conclusion.

Atheists don't care about evidence...

@StephenVanEck @Excellentsalvic Numbers to abuse... 🤔 What an odd statement.. do you like abusing people ?

@Excellentsalvic NOT TRUE. I have attacked Islam before. I criticize Hinduism, fairly and not childishly. But remember ONLY Christianity has the numbers to abuse, so they must get most of my attention.

Why is that atheists never attack other religions? Only Christianity?

@MentallyNathan Crazy imagine seeing jesus rise from the dead then go around proclaiming what you witnessed. Then the crazy part.. dying for what you witnessed.. if it was all just a lie.. I'm sure no one today would have even heard of jesus.

What’s more likely: People stealing a corpse from a grave OR A corpse rising from the grave. Be honest with yourself this Easter 🐣

@azizmeshal_ @allyragsdale 1 John 2:22-24 22 Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.

Where is Islam in the Bible? Yes it exists according to John: The Bible points to a future messenger after Jesus, and Jesus said: “He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears…” (John 16:13) “When the helper comes, he will testify about me.” (John 15:26) This perfectly matches Prophet Muhammad who delivered revelation word-for-word and confirmed Jesus Christ. Islam is the continuation, not a contradiction.

Muslims: Jesus was a prophet. Buddhists: Jesus was a teacher. Hindus: Jesus is another god. Atheists: Jesus was just a person. Christians: Jesus is fully man & fully God. He died for our sins and rose again on the third day. All who believe in him will have eternal life.

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Sahih Muslim 820a - read this ... And tell me who is being in good faith.. then read my entire argument and it will make sense.

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq I’vedisengaging. It’s clear it’s not in good faith you’re presenting arguments you don’t fully understand, likely recycled from Google. Continuing is pointless if your goal is to insist on your misunderstandings rather than seek understanding. Have a lovely evening. 😃

Christians say the Quran copied the Bible. But the Quran mentions Jesus speaking as a baby, and it tells you why. When Mary was accused, she pointed to the child, and the baby spoke to defend her, declaring his mission and clearing her name. Open the Bible, that moment is not there at all. So think. If the Quran was copying, where did that detail come from? Copying doesn’t create new information. So here’s the real question to any Christian: Since this story is not in the Bible, do you consider it a lie… or a truth your scripture never preserved?

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Seems to have gone quiet now.. Ill assume you have just released what that hadith talks about and how it's a bit of an issue for your argument

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq “He canonised due to fears of differing recitations” What do you think eliminating variation in recitations means 😆

@TheRealJamieKay What is the church Jamie... You don't even know do you.. it's not the building only ignorant people think that.

I bet none of them will be at church tomorrow morning for Easter service.

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Sahih Muslim 820a

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Well here's and example I found Surah 33:6 — Father of believers Hafs: وَأَزْوَاجُهُ أُمَّهَاتُهُمْ "and his wives are their mothers" Ubayy's reading adds before this: وَهُوَ أَبٌ لَهُمْ "and he is a father to them"

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq I literally just answered why it was standardised. I even repeated the dialect and recitation style 😆 This is a demonstration that in “every aspect” you aren’t engaging in what I’m saying and on that note - I’m no longer engaging. Have a lovely evening

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Surah 33:6 — Father of believers Hafs: وَأَزْوَاجُهُ أُمَّهَاتُهُمْ "and his wives are their mothers" Ubayy's reading adds before this: وَهُوَ أَبٌ لَهُمْ "and he is a father to them".. this not a better example

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq The Arabic is the same is it not. Three letters Meem (م) , Lam (ل), and Kaf (ك) The second one is a long vowel and hey it reflected in the pronunciation therefore …. Allah word was NOT changed. At all.

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Yeah I'm not buying that. The hadith claims he canonised due to fears of differing recitations. So were there wrong recitations ?

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Uthma did standardise the Quran to preserve it. He didn’t “burn Qurans” arbitrarily … he ensured that the text remained uniform, eliminating variations in dialect or recitation. Again in dialect and recitation.

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq If that's the case why did uthman burn all the other copies of the Qur'an, to standardize them from what exactly?? the perfect book that its words can never change?? The chapters eaten by a goat lost?? In every aspect of what you're saying there was different version.

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq This is exactly why you cannot use English as the standard when discussing the Quran. Arabic is a nuanced language with roots that convey layers of meaning. If you cannot speak Arabic or understand its linguistic structure, it’s incoherent to make arguments like this …

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Did uthman not burn a load of different qurans because of this reason? Or am I missing something

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq So you don’t know Arabic, yet you claim there are “extra words” in the Quran and even gave your own example. I’m confused …what made you think you were qualified to make this argument? Uthman standardised the Quran, and it’s the same text that has been preserved. No change.

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq So from my understanding they have different meanings. But you're missing my point entirely. Allah's words cannot be changed.. this is a changing of the words. "King and owner" you can hide behind the Arabic but this is the most common example.

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq And this is why it’s important to understand the argument you’re making mālik and Malik are literally the same word; the mark on top just stretches the vowel sound “AA” for two beats. Your arguing about recitation styles, I warned you against the beforehand 😆

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq I'm not sure about chapter uthman burnt them all around 650ish goats eat some different ones.. hard to say if you have the full current copy of the Qur'an. But the extra words will be pre uthman if that helps. I don't speak Arabic

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq Can you show me a Quran with a chapter that has different meanings? Please demonstrate this in Arabic, since that is the language of the Quran … you cannot rely on English translations as the standard. I’m genuinely intrigued to see how you will respond to this challenge 😃

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq There are like 36 different qurans some have extra words even chapters with different meanings.... I'm sure you know this as well just pointing out different words "no one can change the words of Allah" (mālik) and (Malik) for example

@HackshawJa18637 @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq There is only one Quran. Before you dispute this, note that the different recitation styles are just variations in pronunciation and dialect … they don’t change the Arabic text or meaning. See the example pictured. The pronunciation for the yellow will be slightly different.

@wiinturrst @GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq More importantly what quran are you referring to please?

@GaryHuerta12 @MasterMaliq The first Arabic translations of the Bible appeared centuries after the Quran mostly 8th–10th c. Arabia. The Quran was revealed in 7th century Arabic, so it couldn’t have “plagiarised” a text that didn’t yet exist in that language. The timeline alone collapses your argument!

@MasterMaliq The infancy gospels of Thomas .. the Arabic infancy gospel is where that was taken from.. but it's not canonical

@JackWDart Ah, I see your misunderstanding.. a huge number of Londoners don't report crime if they did it would match the statistics you referenced. "Likely more" e.g the Clapham incident last week if all reported the crime statistics will change

85% of Reform UK voters think London is unsafe. 63% of people who actually live here say it is safe. That gap was created deliberately. The dystopia is a lie. #London #ReformUK #Farage #Politics