Extraterrestrial Shahīd

3.1K posts

Extraterrestrial Shahīd

@HalalPork4L

Katılım Haziran 2025

96 Takip Edilen86 Takipçiler

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·2 May

SGPC knows a large part of this movie would be Hari Singh going around setting Muslims on fire for killing Dairy Cows. Blowing Muslims out of Cannons for various reasons. And failing at Administration because of wanting to slap the shit out of everyone. This is Hari Singh Nalwa.

Ravinder Singh Robin@rsrobin1

Sri Akal Takht Sahib Rejects Proposal for Making Film on Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa, Cites Ban on Portrayal of Puratan Sikh Warriors.

English

1.2K

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·12h

@Gotra_Rakshit im completely okay with Indic Imagery because i didn’t inherit a Reformist Version of Sikhi. I don’t see the Devi/Devte or any Indic Concepts as Hindu in the sense that they solely belong to Hinduism or that Hinduism has any sort of monopoly on any of these concepts.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·12h

@HalalPork4L While it's a interpolation it does have a genuine basis for claiming a separate third religion but for majority of sikhs at that time there was no such reason they lived following hindu culture. As an example here this image in ca.1839–1843 Manuscript of Shri Gurugranth Sahib.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·1d

Modern Sikhism is largely a colonial construct. As Per your own Sikh Sources "Dasam Granth", Guru Nanak’s mission was to restore ancient Vedic/Sanatana Dharma in Kaliyuga, not start a new religion. Even the Guruship is a boon tied to reciting the Vedas! 📜🚩

ਮਜਾਜਣ ਲਾਹੌਰ ਤੋਂ مجاجڻ لاہور توں Majajan@MaryTeeKaur

P.S it’s more of an Indian Sikh dilemma. I blame the state sponsored oppression which skewed the concept of religion vs culture. Sikhs from Pakistan are predominantly Sindhi or Afghan yet they don’t have any qualms about being authentic Sikhs !

English

926

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·12h

@Gotra_Rakshit Well at least we didn’t go retard mode and start insulting eachother 😂

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·12h

@HalalPork4L I think the discussion is not fruitful so lets leave it at that here the issue is I am suggesting tisra panth-tisra mazhab verses are interpolation in a particular manuscript in 1698. as there is a older manuscript which doesn't have it and other manuscripts also don't.

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·12h

@Gotra_Rakshit Baba Ram Singh Kuka was indeed a Sikh. Those who participated in the Kuka Lehar were Sikhs. Modern Day Namdhari’s have strayed from the Path. Brother, I’ve been telling you time and time again, Tisra Panth is mentioned before the “Nihang Version”

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·12h

@HalalPork4L See it's right to defend your unique identity as a practioner of a religion but from historical POV that Tisra Panth Thing is not seen in Manuscripts variants followed by other than Nihangs (Naamdhari aren't Sikhs) Infact older than this Anandpuri Hazuri Bir doesn't have it.

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit i don’t want to keep going back and forth with you because you seem like an alright Banda, but I’ll say it again … “Tisra Panth” has been mentioned already in the 1690’s…

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·13h

@HalalPork4L even oldest one from that era doesn't have it rather one specific one has that

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit Btw we are both Chandravanshi by Blood Descent. Why don’t we put our differences aside and be friends? 😂

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·13h

@HalalPork4L I can show you can see the digitalised version of patna bir of 1765 there no Uggra Danti there so it's a corruption by Nihangs

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit HAHAHAHAHAHAH I’m not even trying to start anything but this literally just made me spit my drink out. You said “Oh Pedophilia? They all do that” Wtf Bro??? 😂😂😂😂

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

Ambedkar did say at times calls for destruction of hindu religion and was against India's independence. So anyday Gandhi >> BRA . For pedophilia even BRA's son has done that. So BRA didn't oppose

याजुषी@yaajushi

@TradDeshastha Please. I'll anyday choose BRA over a pdf/pdf-esque person. धर्माच्या बाता कोणालाही मारता येतात, आचरण खरं. कितीही मनुवादी बडबड केली तरी नागड्याने बायकांसोबत झोपणारा षंढ हिंदूद्रोहीच. आंबेडकर निदान "हिंदूंनो, मरा" असे आवाहन करत नसे.

English

263

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit No, that’s where you’re wrong. Satguru Baba Nanak Dev is Akaal Roop. They are Nirankar. They are Nehkalank. We are not the same as them because Satguru Nanak Dev Ji is not just a Human. They are literally Sri Akaal Purakh manifesting themselves in the Kalyug to spread Dharma

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·13h

@HalalPork4L In Brahm Swaroop, once Avidya (ignorance) is removed, you, me, and everything else is Supreme—not just Nanak. Guru Nanak simply realized his true Swaroop: Sat-Chit-Ananda. His ultimate realization was 'Aham Brahmasmi'."

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit Not True. I don’t care if the Nirmalas Reject it. They Reject it because they didn’t retain it, not our problem. They didn’t have access to all Manuscripts either mate. Patna Bir 1765 isn’t the only Manuscript containing Uggardanti. And Tisra Panth finds mention in the 1690’s

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·13h

@HalalPork4L There is only one manuscript which frankly uses 1695 Patna version and it is not even in Standard Dasam Granth. Infact the oldest Manuscript doesn't have it , nor manuscripts after that have it. it was a interpolation by Nihangs rejected by Niramla , unfound in Udasi

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit Tara Singh Narotam Ji did not have access to all Manuscripts lol. That’s why he asserts that it’s written by Sukha Singh. Little do you know This has been debunked. We Truly are the Tisra Panth. And it’s you and Sulleh that have a problem with it, not us.. Leave us alone

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·13h

@HalalPork4L I have looked debunked much of non sense of Tisra Panth. Like Uggardanti is not seen in except 1 Manuscripts and even Tara Singh and Singh Sabha views it as not by Guru.

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit 😂😂😂😂 Okay so then you agree that Satguru Nanak Dev Ji is Supreme?

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·13h

@HalalPork4L That's Brahm Realisation (*at Paramartha) nothing special in fact in Astavakra Gita read Raja Janaka's Brahm Realisation. Infact even in Veda Samhita itself the Rishi Brahma Realisation

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit 😂😂😂😂 Nonsense. Do your research. What i speak is the truth. If you do not know it, it’s because you haven’t looked hard enough brother.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L " It relates to Sikhi being the Dharma Panth, the Param Marag (The Highest Way) " This itself is not found in Guru Granth / Dasam Granth (except for Ugradanti is considered a later interpolation) " Satguru Nanak Dev Ji ... Sri Maya" This is Advaita there if you knew Vedanta

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit Not True… Tisra Panth has been in use since the 1690’s! I hate the fact that we would agree, but because of Singh Sabha vs Arya Samaji’s and the Gay British, we are going back and forth lol

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L Out these only Uggardanti has that Tisra Panth line and that Uggardanti is itself only found Nihang Sikh version not in other manuscripts. If you want I can show 1765 Patna Bir .

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·13h

@Gotra_Rakshit Sri Akaal Purakh Ji is Satguru Nanak Dev. Vasudev is Satguru Nanak Dev. Hari is Satguru Nanak Dev Gobind is Satguru Nanak Dev Ram is Satguru Nanak Dev Satguru Nanak Dev is Vaheguru And they are the True Master of All. They are ੴ They are ॐ 卐

हिन्दी

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L Wa = Vishnu / Vasudeva He = Hari /Krishna Gu = Gobind / Guru Nanak Ru = Rama Ji it's clearly mentioned Vishnu Ji along with Yugas so it's quite clear you guys believe that your Guru Nanak was avatar of Vishnu. Waheguru is not separate entity rather Brahman with Vishnu as Isht

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·14h

@Gotra_Rakshit You know these aren’t modern corruptions right? 😂 You need to go back and read Sri Bachittar Natak, Akaal Ustat, Chandi Di Vaar, Uggardanti. Please. Sikhi is the Tisra Panth. The Param Marg The True Dharma Panth. We are Khalsa.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L Akaal Purush is Brahm like not a entity rather a name designation and it is viewed as your Ishta devta is that like Guru Gobind Singh did for Devi , Guru Nanak did for Vishnu. Ofcourse you won't accept because Modern Corruptions in Gurmat

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·14h

@Gotra_Rakshit If you are a student of Sikhi, you should know where it is from … Ill give you a hint; It relates to Sikhi being the Dharma Panth, the Param Marag (The Highest Way), and the Assertion that Satguru Nanak Dev Ji is Sri Akaal Purakh, is Vasudev, Hari, Gobind, Ram, Sri Maya.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L I don't think this verse is from Gurugranth Sahib or Dasam Granth

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·14h

@Gotra_Rakshit Bro don’t play stupid, you know I’m not referring to the Singh Sabha that prevailed right? 😂 Guru Nanak Dev Ji is Vaheguru, is Sri Akaal Purakh….

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L 🤣🤣🤣 That is 1900 thing is a corruption in interpretation by Singh Sabha and others not in original Gurugranth and Dasam Granth. Look what does it say Waheguru Narayana /Vishnu and Nanak was his avatar in Kali Yuga. x.com/Gotra_Rakshit/…

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit

Who is Waheguru? Wa = Vishnu / Vasudeva He = Hari /Krishna Gu = Gobind / Guru Nanak Ru = Rama Ji Matlab seedha Bhagwan Narayana Vishnu ji hi hain. Bas ek catch " Nanakpanthi" Guru Nanak ko unka avatar maante hain. Lekin Sabka Baap Raamlal hi nikalega… 100% guarantee!

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·14h

@Gotra_Rakshit Hahahahahaha It is pointless speaking about this with you because you’ll never accept the Sikh/Gurmat view. This is not referring to mere Devi/Devte who are Lesser Agents. This is referring to Sri Akaal Purakh in their Ability to Create, Preserve, Destroy, Nurture, Dwell.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L It's telling Guru is Ishavar , Guru is Brahma , Guru is Parbati Maai so it's pretty clear you don't understand original language That's not what the Text . The text rather is interpreted that Akaal Purush (Brahm) through MAYA takes various forms.

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·14h

@Gotra_Rakshit This was literally solved in the 1900’s when Hindus literally did not agree with Sanatan Sikhs 😂😂 Sanatan Sikhs were so hardcore that Hindus got skittish at the fact that their versions of the Devi/Devte in Hinduism are subservient to Satguru Nanak 😂

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L Give example to demonstrate otherwise it's a Hawa Hawai claim . Which aspect is unique like atleast in Buddhist you can say Dependent Origination is unique while for Sikhs no such thing is found.

English

Extraterrestrial Shahīd@HalalPork4L·14h

@Gotra_Rakshit This is incorrect. You are getting confused. You are getting the Devi/Devte that are Lesser Agents confused for Sri Akaal Purakh. The Devi/Devte are lesser than Satguru Nanak Dev Ji that is Akaal Roop. The Devi/Devte are at the command of the Satguru.

English

Unapologetic@Gotra_Rakshit·14h

@HalalPork4L " Sri Akal Purakh bound by human flesh "| So is Devi in Brahmswaroop "Devi received help from the Satguru " Devi herself is Satguru in Brahmaswaroop infact even Guru Nanak identies that correctly through Hindu saying गुरु ईसरु गुरु गोरखु बरमा गुरु पारबती माई ॥

Keşfet

@Gotra_Rakshit @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano @BillGates @NASA @nikifrancismediavine