Etnik Halili

127 posts

Etnik Halili banner
Etnik Halili

Etnik Halili

@HaliliEtnik

Ingénieur IoT Smart Building 📲 🏢 Passionné des échecs ♟️

Paris, France Katılım Temmuz 2024
93 Takip Edilen231 Takipçiler
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
there’s only one white bull.
David Gokhshtein tweet media
English
105
52
881
102.3K
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
supply control is a must for the idea to succeed.
English
81
40
615
76.5K
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
Some of you are still chasing bullshit and worshipping false prophets. Then you wonder why you’re always the exit liquidity. You deserve every loss that’s coming your way. Not because the market is against you… Because you keep refusing to learn. Literally zero sympathy.
David Gokhshtein tweet media
English
67
28
573
60.9K
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
Are you ready to win together?
David Gokhshtein tweet media
English
134
44
666
23.1K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Good explanation of why some people find “wealth” inexplicable
Konstantin Kisin@KonstantinKisin

This is because the anti-capitalist left is not actually against people being crazy rich. They're against certain types of people being crazy rich. Artists and athletes make sense to them because they've played music and sports and because their success can be explained by "luck" and "talent". Messi's wealth is not offensive to them because they understand Messi is much better at football than they are. But when it comes to business, the anti-capitalist leftist has no framework for understanding why Jeff Bezos might be super rich since 99% of them have never ever created a product, business or service that was of value to other people. They've never taken entrepreneurial risk. They've never employed people and felt the burden of responsibility that comes with that. They've never pick up a business and given it a play in the way they've picked up a ball or a guitar. They *literally* don't understand wealth creation. They think there is a fixed amount of money and the only thing a business does is split it unfairly. It's why they rage at Elon and other successful business leaders. Because they genuinely don't understand why they're wealthy. Also, and this is just as important, athletes and artists are disproportionately young, attractive, "diverse", left wing etc. Business leaders are "evil" middle aged white men whose success offends the average anti-capitalist leftist because they don't understand a) what it is they do and b) that Elon Musk has the same talent advantage on them as Messi does, it's just harder to measure.

English
2.2K
4K
23.2K
3.7M
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
We’re running a bit late, but we’re coming.
David Gokhshtein tweet media
English
145
98
926
82.3K
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
Make them regret fading a community.
English
34
14
96
3.7K
David Gokhshtein
David Gokhshtein@davidgokhshtein·
Probably would be smart to have your notifications on.
David Gokhshtein tweet media
English
90
42
330
25K
Etnik Halili
Etnik Halili@HaliliEtnik·
@RepLuna @POTUS You referred as Inter-dimensional Beings earlier !! What happened to that name?
English
0
0
3
14
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna@RepLuna·
Thank you, Department of War and ARRO for this historic collaboration, as well as @POTUS for authorizing the release. The videos you requested have the following caption on them: “On March 6, 2026, eight members of the U.S. House of Representatives requested access to 51 potentially UAP-related records allegedly held by the Department of war and the Intelligence Community. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) identified a collection of responsive materials held on a classified network. Many of these materials lack a substantiated chain-of-custody.”
English
221
297
2.3K
67.7K
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
ELON MUSK: "How often is the most ironic outcome the most likely? Look at the names of AI companies. Midjourney is not mid. Stability AI is unstable. OpenAI is closed. Anthropic is misanthropic."
English
263
286
1.7K
87.8K
NIK
NIK@ns123abc·
🚨 OpenAI just REMOVED the AGI clause that was a structural protection of OpenAI's charitable mission, while jury selection was happening today The 2019 capped-profit structure had three protections for the charitable mission: 1. 100x profit cap: REMOVED in PBC conversion 2. AGI clause: REMOVED today 3. Microsoft exclusivity: REMOVED today All three are gone. This is exactly what Musk's lawsuit alleges: the people running OpenAI systematically dismantled the mission-protection mechanisms. Today they did it again. The defense theory just got harder. OpenAI's defense includes: "Microsoft's $13 billion-plus investment was necessary for our mission. Without that capital, OpenAI couldn't have shipped GPT-4 or scaled ChatGPT." But today, on the morning of trial, OpenAI announced they are decoupling from Microsoft: • AGI clause REMOVED. The nuclear option that let the non-profit board terminate Microsoft's commercial rights once AGI was achieved. Gone. • Microsoft IP license now NON-EXCLUSIVE through 2032. OpenAI can license to anyone. • Cloud exclusivity ENDED. OpenAI can sell across AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle. • Revenue share capped. Microsoft no longer pays revenue share to OpenAI; OpenAI still pays Microsoft through 2030. If Microsoft was so necessary, why restructure on the day the case reaches a jury? Musk's lawyers will use this in court tomorrow.
NIK tweet mediaNIK tweet mediaNIK tweet media
English
397
1.4K
5.7K
1.7M
Etnik Halili
Etnik Halili@HaliliEtnik·
@BillyM2k Help Suchir's mom reopen the case about his son being murdered by Scam Altman
English
0
0
2
16
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the smart contract engineer who built the function that lets one anonymous wallet freeze any token holder's assets in the President's crypto project. I added it one week before trading opened. Nobody told the investors. At deployment, in September 2024, the contract was clean. Standard ERC-20. Auditable. The kind of contract you show to investors and say: "See? Decentralized." But we made it upgradeable. Eleven months later, on August 24th, 2025 — one week before trading — I pushed the v2 upgrade. The blacklist function. The freeze authority, routed through a 3-of-5 multisig where a single externally owned address serves as both the guardian and a signer on the multisig. One wallet. Two roles. Three of five votes to freeze anyone's tokens. Anyone's. We built a special vesting category. Category 3. There are 519 other investors. They're all in Category 1. Category 3 has exactly one member: Justin Sun, who put $75 million into the project. His allocation, isolated into its own bucket, governed by its own rules, monitored by its own triggers. But the blacklist function doesn't take a name. It takes a wallet address. Any wallet address. Then, in November, I added what we call "batch reallocation." It can move tokens from any wallet to any other wallet, at any time, at the discretion of the admin. We told people it was a phishing recovery tool. That's phishing recovery. The Trump family takes 75% of net proceeds from token sales. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. manage the project. By December 2025, they had extracted roughly $1 billion. They hold another $3 billion in unsold tokens. The project calls itself decentralized governance. The governance token can be frozen by one person nobody will identify. That's governance. Three days before everything went public, on April 9th, the project deposited 5 billion WLFI tokens into Dolomite — a lending protocol co-founded by WLFI's own Head of Technical Strategy, Corey Caplan — as collateral and borrowed $75 million. Sixty-five million of it in USD1, the project's own stablecoin. After the deposit, WLFI accounted for 55% of Dolomite's entire total supply. Ordinary depositors who'd lent USD1 to the pool couldn't withdraw. Their liquidity was locked so ours could be free. Over $40 million of those borrowed funds went to Coinbase Prime. That's a fiat off-ramp. You borrow against your own token on a platform co-founded by your own Head of Technical Strategy in your own stablecoin, convert to cash, and call it treasury management. Sun moved 55 million tokens to HTX over three days. Minutes after he activated his wallet, the multisig changed his Category 3 to allow 20% transferable. Then froze him the moment he transferred. They were watching in real time. He called it a backdoor. Used that word. "A trap masquerading as a door." We sent the cease-and-desist on April 13th. "See you in court pal," the project wrote. Not for freezing his tokens. We can do that. The compliance module says so. The whitepaper says so. The single wallet controlling the multisig says so. We're suing him for calling it what it is. The function is not a backdoor. The function is a regulatory compliance mechanism that was absent from the original contract, added via an upgradeable proxy eleven months after a $75 million investment, one week before trading, into a custom vesting category built for a single investor, controlled by a single anonymous wallet, on a platform where the President's sons have already taken $1 billion in proceeds and borrowed $75 million against their own token on a lending protocol co-founded by their own Head of Technical Strategy in their own stablecoin three days before the largest investor went public. That's compliance. And if you're holding WLFI tokens right now, the same anonymous wallet that froze a billionaire can freeze you too.
Peter Girnus 🦅 tweet media
English
142
271
802
98.2K