Talha🇹🇷

Ahl al-Ilm and al-Istighātha 🧵

İsrail’de “Erdoğan Belgeseli” yayınlandı. Ana tema; Türk Askeri Korkusu ve Erdoğan korkusu… Fakat belgeselde diyorki; “Tarihte ilk defa Erdoğan İsrail’le ticareti tamamen kesti ve sıfırladı” Şimdi sorarım Saadetçilere ve Fatih Erbakan’a! Hala şu gün bile İsrail’le ticareti kes diye propoganda yapıyorsunuz. Sizde hiç utanma yok mu? Sende hiç utanma yok mu Fatih?

જ⁀➴ Hangi İmam Ahmed, Hangi Hanbelilik ? 𒎓 Ebubekir Sifil Hoca ✧❃✧ 1️⃣ 00:00 İmam Ahmed'in Görüşlerini Tespit Etmenin Zorluğu. Ondan Nakledilen Bazı Görüşler Şüpheli Gelmesi 2️⃣ 17:24 Hangi İmam Ahmed ? Bakın İmam Buhari Ne Diyor; Abdullah Babası İmam Ahmed'den Ne Naklediyor ? Hangisi Doğru? 3️⃣ 22:41 İbn Teymiye'ye Reddiye Veren Hanbeliler.. Hanbelilik İçinde Sünnî ve Teşbihçi Damar 💥 22:54 İmam Ahmed bin Hanbel'in Mezhebini Ehl-i Sünnet Çizgide Nakleden Alimlerin Listesi 4️⃣ 27:43 Hanbelilik İçinden M. bin Abdülvehhab'a (Vehhabiliğe) Reddiyeler

İstiğaze üzerinden Said Nursi rh. gibi alimleri müslümanları tekfir edenler aşşağıdaki alimleride tekfir etmeli 👇

Al madad Ya RasoolAllah salalahu alaihi waAlihi wasalam Make a series of forwards by quoting same phrase.

Wahhabi hate is so forced, and all they do is maintain strict monotheism and avoid innovation in the religion of Muḥammad ﷺ. Imagine hating them for maintaining orthodoxy.

Muhammed bin Abdülvehhab'ın kendi akidesinden olmayanı ve de Osmanlıyı tekfir etmesi I Ebubekir Sifil

Beni, sahabeyi ve özellikle Hz Muaviye’yi sevdirerek rafizîlerden, Hz Ali’yi sevdirerek nasibîlerden, Hz Hüseyin’i sevdirerek yezidîlerden ve Ehli sünnet alimlerini sevdirerek tekfircilerden ayıran Rabbime hamd olsun..

Yıldırım Bayezid nerden çıktı? Demek ki, Persler Anadolu'yu zihnen şekillendirmiş! Araplasmayacagiz diye inat eder iken, Perslesmisler! Hasan Ruhani boşuna demedi Anadolu'daki etkimiz tahmin edilenin ötesinde! TRÇ ittifakı!

Yine bir bedevi ve yine bir latife :) Bir bedevi, oğlunu bir hocaya teslim etti; sonra bir süre ortadan kayboldu. Dönüp gelince oğluna sordu: “Şu an hangi sûredesin?” Oğlu dedi ki: “Kul yâ eyyuhe’l-kâfirun sûresindeyim (De ki: Ey kafirler...).” Bedevi dedi ki: “Ne kötü bir topluluğun arasına düşmüşsün!” Sonra yine bir müddet kayboldu. Tekrar geldiğinde yine sordu. Oğlu dedi ki: “İzâ câeke’l-munâfikun suresindeyim (Münafıklar sana geldiği zaman...).” Bedevi bunun üzerine şöyle dedi: “Vallahi sen bir yerden bir yere hep küfür ve nifak kazıkları üzerinde dolaşıp durmuşsun! Bırak bu işi, hayvanlarının başına dön de onları güt!”

(MIAW) Ibn Abd al wahab said: "The People of the last 600 years were upon nothing." So this entire Ummah was upon nothing and Islam was lost until MIAW's discovery of tawhid? 😭🤣

(MIAW) Ibn Abd al wahab said: "The People of the last 600 years were upon nothing." So this entire Ummah was upon nothing and Islam was lost until MIAW's discovery of tawhid? 😭🤣

The Dire Consequences of Takfīr Upon Disunity of the Ummah The great scholar and ‘Ābid, of Yemen, Imām Ibn Al-Wazīr (d.840) said in his famous book Īthār al-Haqq ‘Alal-Khalq 2/522,524: “The seventh point: that Allāh, Exalted is He, has explicitly stated the prohibition of disunity in His Noble Book, and this has come in many forms in both the Book and the Sunnah. There is nothing more obscene in causing disunity than arriving at declaring others kāfir (takfīr) based on non-definitive proofs that can be countered by similar ones - proofs that could instead be used to avoid declaring takfīr and to bring about unity. We only said that nothing is more heinous than this form of prohibited disunity because it leads to the greatest levels of hostility, estrangement, and separation. The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said concerning a man who had been punished for drinking wine - when people repeatedly cursed him because of that: “Do not help the shaytān against your brother; for indeed, he loves Allāh and His Messenger.”… So, whatever is closer to unity is more correct and preferable, and whatever is closer to disunity, calls to it, and stirs it up is more corrupt and invalid. How vast is the difference between expelling the general masses of all the sects of Islam - along with the majority of scholars who identify as Muslims - expelling them out of the Islamic Religion, whereby the ranks of the Muslims could have been increased - compared to instead including them within the fold of Islam, giving victory to the Religion through them, increasing the numbers of the Muslims, and strengthening its cause?! Therefore, it is not permissible to strive in causing disunity by forcing takfīr upon them through proofs that are opposed by what is stronger than them or equal to them - proofs that would instead unite the word, strengthen Islam, preserve lives, and calm the masses - until the kufr of the heretic becomes as clear as the break of dawn, there is unanimous agreement upon it, and the dharūrah (necessity) requires it.”