عبد الرحمن retweetledi
ماتت على الشرك
حتى المشركين الاولين في الشده لا يشركون
الشاهين 🦅@falc313
لحظة استشهاد امرأة ايرانية وهي تنادي يا فاطمة الزهراء (ع)
العربية
عبد الرحمن
4.4K posts
عبد الرحمن
@He_Laughed
قُلۡ اِنَّ صَلَاتِىۡ وَنُسُكِىۡ وَ مَحۡيَاىَ وَمَمَاتِىۡ لِلّٰهِ رَبِّ الۡعٰلَمِيۡنَ https://t.co/2swQzUeaIb
Katılım Ocak 2020
364 Takip Edilen134 Takipçiler
عبد الرحمن retweetledi
An Iranian woman calls upon Fatimah al-Zahra in her final moments after a US-Israeli airstrike on Iran.
English
عبد الرحمن retweetledi
She died the death of a pagan just like millions of hindus in India die of causes (warfare or otherwise).
A Muslim's reaction to this should be exactly the same as watching a hindu lady succumbing to death while calling upon krishna.
Being a delusionalist won't help your case.
شرقزده sharghzadeh@sharghzadeh
Wahhabis in the comments are mocking a (likely dead woman) because she had an incorrect theological belief (calling unto the dead). These sick people are traitors to our nation.
English
عبد الرحمن retweetledi
“Khamenei had a fatwa calling for Shias not to insult the companions of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ ”
“We should unite against the Zionists”
Meanwhile Axis in Syria when there were Zionist aggression in Palestine, Lebanon, etc:
anon@AyKarT0
Hezbollah was already involved in the conflict long before the rise of AQ/ISIS. They were in Syria - where the majority of the population is Sunni. Despite their propaganda claiming to be against sectarianism and calling for unity with Sunnis, their actions tell a different story. Hezbollah militants recorded themselves spreading terror in Syria. Clip 1: Hezbollah militants taunting a captured Sunni resistance fighter by insulting Aisha RA Clip 2: Hezbollah militants speaking against Sunni Islam while fighting in Syria Clip 3: Hezbollah militant wanting to wipe all Sunnis out Clip 4: Hezbollah militant vows to kill all Sunnis after taking control of the city of Qusayr in 2013
Català
@Kafirewwnasty @KamranK71219915 The prophet ﷺ really possessed the capacity to point to the moon. Prophet Musa (AS) really possessed the capacity to strike the sea with his staff.
The miraculous occurrences, on the other thand, were directly and completely caused by Allah's actions.
The difference is clear.
English
@He_Laughed @KamranK71219915 So when you pick up a cup is it Allah SWT who picks it up for you or is it you with the permission of Allah SWT ? You guys are just playing semantics ... Everyone knows nothing happens without the permission of Allah SWT but you guys are too low IQ and get played by the Jews
English
Really? Is Esa (alahisalam) a minor god, since the 'supreme deity' gave him the ability to cure lepers and bring the dead back to life?
Adnan Rashid@MrAdnanRashid
This is the worst kind of shirk. This is Greek mythology. Minor gods, given power by the Supreme Deity. Allah does not delegate his unique characteristics (i.e. creation/control of the universe) to others. If others can be creators, can they also be worshipped? Reconcile.
English
@im_Shahrukhs @KamranK71219915 That's irrelevant to the point I'm making.
English
@He_Laughed @KamranK71219915 And that's what the believe is
No one believes that without Allah's permissions anything can happen
English
عبد الرحمن retweetledi
These ppl justify the worst forms of paganism (close to there can possibly be), watering down/altering basic tawhid to the point of literally arguing how absolute Hinduisms r compatible with tawhid (not shirk), but r worried about compassionate imams watering down Hijab & music.
Farid@Farid_0v
Does believing in a different creator for the universe constitute shirk? Muhammad Yasir al-Hanafi, the popular Ash'ari theologian, answers the question.
English
عبد الرحمن retweetledi
- اللهم في هذه الليلة الوترية، فك أسر الشيخ سليمان العلوان وإخوانه من العلماء والمصلحين. اللهم إنهم قد حُبسوا لقول الحق ونصرة دينك، فكن لهم ناصراً ومعيناً. اللهم عجّل بفرجهم، واجمع شملهم بأهلهم، واجزهم عن الأمة خير الجزاء، واكسر قيد كل مظلوم في سجون الظالمين.
-rayan@ra__ay
- اللهم في هذه الليالي المباركة من العشر الأواخر فرّج عن شيخنا أيمن عبد الرحيم وفك قيده وأزل عنه الكرب وثبّته على الحق، وأعلِ قدره في الدنيا والآخرة، واجزه عنا خير الجزاء، ومتعه بالصحة والعافية وأطل عمره في طاعتك، وردّه إلى أهله سالمًا قريبًا، وانتصر له ممن ظلمه وسجنه وحرَمنا منه
العربية
عبد الرحمن retweetledi
A lot of the discussion around the Iran-Israel-US conflict feels pretty shallow. It’s like certain people are trying to reduce a very complicated reality into a neat black-and-white dichotomy, as if there’s only one serious or acceptable way to respond to it.
Once you put aside the obvious extremes (like wanting either side to come out of this with even greater regional power or acting as though this conflict somehow wipes away everything else they have done and turns them into noble saviors), there’s clearly more than one reasonable position a person can take. That doesn’t mean every one of those positions is equally sound, only that they’re perfectly understandable and morally legitimate responses to the whole thing.
Someone can be strongly opposed to an American and Israeli victory that strengthens their influence in the region, while at the same time also being strongly opposed to any outcome that strengthens Iran’s own regional power. Someone may want an Iranian victory that sets America and Israel back without that leading to broader Iranian domination in the region. Someone may be deeply hostile to the Iranian regime given its brutal record, while still refusing to treat America and Israel as the righteous side. Someone may refuse to support either side at all. Someone may simply think that when all of the parties involved have such nasty track records, and when the possible outcomes themselves carry real dangers, the most honest position is not to rally behind any camp.
There’s nothing surprising about that. Some of these positions may look strategically mistaken when analyzed at a more technical level, but that does not make them “morally absurd” in any obvious sense, and it shouldn’t be hard to understand why many people would hold them.
English
@He_Laughed I'm frankly not open to waste more time on you
English
The hadith talks about beginning and ending.
We're neither in the beginning nor the end, since the end will be at the very least after the coming back of 'Issa(a.s).
That he, and salafis in general, are unable to grasp this is why you guys are mocked as juhal
ورده 🌹 @F4timahh_
Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab رحمه الله said: If Islam returns to be something strange just as it began as mentioned in the Hadith, then how ignorant is he who uses the majority of the people as proof. [Ad-Durar As-Sanniyyah 1/41]
English
@ZouhairsMurid Likewise, my example spoke of the civilization as a whole.
English
@He_Laughed ... you can't even give proper examples. If it is said that it returned to a weakened state, it signals the end of an era. It's still an end, comparatively of one state to another
But the hadith talks about islam as a whole, or will you provide another ta'wil to say it's a part?
English
@ZouhairsMurid Just as Islamic civilization will as indicated in other narrations.
English
@ZouhairsMurid You are reading into it what really isn't there.
For instance, if I say a civilization returned to a weakened state, just as how it was when it began, it doesn't follow that I am saying it will then cease to exist. It could rise and fall again.
English
@ZouhairsMurid Minor signs era isn't monolithic. It could be referring to a later era of end times where minor signs are fulfilled frequently and in abundance.
Further, just like end time-ness, strangeness is a spectrum. Islam in the major signs era would be even stranger.
English
@He_Laughed Holy larp again. By this reading islam did not start as anything strange since it was always during the end time considering minor signs occured during his lifetime.
English
@ZouhairsMurid Regardless, several end time signs have already come to pass so that reading isn't problematic either.
English
@ZouhairsMurid Lol it's just saying it'll go back to being how it was at the beginning. Nothing necessitates an end.
There's no linguistic rule that necessitates that a contrast with a beginning state implies a termination.
English
@ZouhairsMurid Return doesn't necessitate end (Could return to being strange well before its end).
Not sure why this has to be spelled out.
English