Charles Hefner 🇺🇸🦅

@TrumpNewsFanss @RightScopee 👍!! Absolutely 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING: A new CBS poll shows Republican approval of Donald Trump jumping 5 points to 92.3%. Are you among the 92.3%? A. Huge Yes B. No IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!! MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏

@ShadowBriefing_ YES 🇺🇸

🚨DEVELOPING: Do you support the Supreme Court mandating Voter ID across all 50 states? A. YES B. NO

@NuclearMAGAlady YES

Do you support Judge Boasberg getting disbarred for Unconstitutionally going after Trump ? YES or NO ?

@MAGANEWS_X Yes 🇺🇸

President Trump will VETO any TPS extension for 350,000 Haitians! He is putting America First. 🇺🇸 To the 10 weak RINOs who voted with the Left... Should Trump veto TPS for 350,000 Haitians? A. Yes B. No

@HazelMoore32 @DebPutnam9 A. Yes ✋ 🇺🇸

Raise your hand if you want the Supreme Court to ban Birthright Citizenship to foreign invaders? A. Yes B. No

@WHLeavitt @POTUS 1. Hell Yes

President Trump is trying to exclude illegal aliens from the U.S. census, which removes House seats from Blue states like California, New York etc. @POTUS was tagged for comments. Do you support excluding illegals from the U.S. census?? 1. Hell Yes 2. No

@AntiLeftMemes Before midterm 🇺🇸

🚨The "SAVE Act" will mandate that only American citizens can vote in U.S. elections nationwide. Should the Senate and President Trump pass this before the midterms ?? A. YES 👍 B. NO 👎

@MAGANEWS_X Obama & his Auto Pen!

Who do you think was the worst U.S. president? A. Bill Clinton B. Barack Obama C. Joe Biden D. Donald Trump Vote below 👇

The House pathetically passed this measure to misuse our tax payers money once again! (H.R. 1689 or related resolution to extend Temporary Protected Status for Haiti for three years) on April 16, 2026, by a vote of 224-204 (or reported as 220-207 in some summaries; the slight variance may reflect the exact procedural vs. final tally). Nearly all Democrats voted yea. The Republicans (plus one Independent who caucuses with them) who voted yea were: - Don Bacon (R-NE) - Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) - Mike Lawler (R-NY) - María Elvira Salazar (R-FL) - Carlos Giménez (R-FL) - Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) - Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) - Mike Turner (R-OH) - Mike Carey (R-OH) - Rich McCormick (R-GA) Kevin Kiley (I-CA), who caucuses with Republicans, also voted yea. This totals around 10 Republicans crossing over on the final passage (sources vary slightly between 6–11 depending on whether they count procedural votes, final passage, or additional floor support; the core group of crossover support came from members in districts with Haitian communities or moderate leanings)

The Great Betrayal: Democrats Rejoice as GOP Defectors and Turncoat Kiley Hand Leftists a Massive Win The scene on the House floor Thursday was a gut-punch to anyone still fighting for the President’s agenda. As the final tally of 224-204 flashed on the screen, Democrats burst out cheering, their applause echoing through the chamber in celebration of a three-year TPS extension for 350,000 Haitians. 🔥AMNESTY. A Knife in the Back This wasn’t just a legislative loss; it was a calculated betrayal. The measure only reached the floor because seven Republicans chose to buck the President and join a Democrat-led discharge petition. However, the most egregious move came from Rep. Kevin Kiley. After recently ditching the Republican party to become an Independent, Kiley completed his saboteur bow into a full-blown turncoat by casting his vote with the Democrats. What are we looking at ? Inside the Betrayal: 🔪350,000: The number of individuals granted a multi-year stay, further straining national resources. 🔪7 GOP RINO Defectors: provided the bridge ' victory. The Kiley Flip: A back stab move by the former Republican to prioritize the Democrat agenda over the platform he was originally elected to serve. So here we are. No SAVE Act No Filibuster nuke. Meanwhile the minority party was busy high-fiving and celebrating their victory. This betrayal should make your blood boil. The message to the American people was clear: with "allies" like these, the fight for border integrity is being sabotaged from within our own ranks.

• Other 2025 assignments: Ordered preservation of executive branch communications (e.g., Signal app messages related to Yemen strike planning). Criticized in DOJ misconduct complaints for alleged bias or improper comments about the administration potentially triggering a “constitutional crisis.”

IMPEACHMENT FOR JUDGE BOASBERG? “I think it's really something we should look at…Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has already looked into this. He's already pointed out some of the things that Judge Boasberg has done that would be right for impeachment.” - @claudiatenney @AmandaHead @jsolomonReports

Indeed Judge Boasberg needs to be Impeached! 🇺🇸 Judge James E. Boasberg (Obama appointee, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia since 2023) has issued several rulings during Donald Trump’s presidencies (2017–2021 and 2025–present) that blocked or constrained executive branch actions, particularly on immigration enforcement and national security. Many of Boasberg’s orders in the second term faced appeals, stays, or reversals (e.g., by the D.C. Circuit or Supreme Court), and higher courts have at times found he exceeded his authority. These primarily involve immigration/deportation challenges, where plaintiffs (often ACLU or migrants) sued and Boasberg granted relief. During Trump’s First Presidency (2017–2021) Boasberg was not one of the most prominent “travel ban” or DACA blockers (those went to other D.D.C. judges), but he handled some enforcement cases: • July 2, 2018 (asylum detention policy): Issued a preliminary injunction barring ICE from detaining asylum seekers (at five field offices: Detroit, El Paso, Los Angeles, Newark, Philadelphia) for more than seven days without a credible fear hearing or release. He found ICE violated its own policies and ordered relief/hearings for over 1,000 people already detained longer than seven days, plus written explanations for any extended detention. • December 1, 2017, and March 27, 2019 (other immigration/asylum-related): Part of broader D.D.C. litigation challenging Trump-era policies; Boasberg issued orders against certain administrative actions on asylum processing or related matters. These were framed by some as judicial second-guessing of executive immigration priorities. • FISA Court oversight (2019–2021, as presiding judge): Publicly acknowledged DOJ/FBI “material misstatements and omissions” in Carter Page FISA warrant renewals (related to the Russia investigation). He barred some involved officials from future FISA applications and required reforms. • January 2021 (Clinesmith sentencing): As the district judge, sentenced former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith to probation (no jail time) + community service for altering an email used in a Page FISA application. Trump critics called it a “slap on the wrist” that downplayed misconduct in the Russia probe. Boasberg also ruled in favor of the administration in some instances, e.g., dismissing efforts to force IRS release of Trump’s tax returns (2017) and ordering Hillary Clinton email releases. During Trump’s Second Presidency (2025–present, as of April 2026) Boasberg has been assigned multiple high-profile Trump cases, drawing scrutiny over case assignment patterns. The most controversial cluster involves the Alien Enemies Act (AEA, 1798) proclamations targeting alleged Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang members/Venezuelan migrants for rapid deportation. • March 15, 2025 (J.G.G. v. Trump / AEA deportations): Issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking further removals under the AEA proclamation and certifying a broad class. Verbally ordered any planes in the air carrying deportees to turn around immediately. The administration proceeded with at least two flights (which had already departed or were over international waters), leading to claims of defiance. Boasberg later called the government’s response “woefully insufficient” and suggested bad faith. • April 2025 (contempt proceedings): Found “probable cause” that the Trump administration (including officials like then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem) was in criminal contempt for willfully violating the TRO by not returning planes or halting flights. He pursued an inquiry and later ordered facilitation of returns/legal relief for some deported individuals (e.g., December 2025 ruling for 137 men, finding deportations illegal and in “open defiance”). Appeals courts (D.C. Circuit) later ruled he abused discretion, vacated the contempt findings, and ordered proceedings ended.

@RepLuna Thune is a Traitor and must be removed! @SenateGOP grow a pair and replace Thune ASAP! 🇺🇸

At this point, Senator Thune is hiding behind Democrats to block SAVE America Act. At the end of the day, he won’t be able to blame Democrats for his failure to get this passed. He is fully capable of making it happen now yet he still refuses. It’s getting old.

@ForgiatoBlow47 @VHBigSlickAAA1 YES -> Milley is a Traitor!

Do you think Mark Milley is a traitor to the United States of America? A. YES B. NO

that polls showed voters rejected in 2024. Trump's first ~15 months (as of April 2026) are cleanup: enforcing statutes on immigration, countering inflation's roots via deregulation/energy production, and funding priorities Biden starved. Activist judges, RINOs, and legacy media amplify the criticism – exactly as your original post noted – but the data shows Biden left Americans with higher costs, more deaths, and weaker sovereignty. Strong action isn't violation; it's leadership correcting four years of failure. If anything, the real constitutional concern is letting the prior chaos fester.

Michael you suggest Trump's actions ignore the rule of law and involve reckless spending. But this overlooks the unprecedented mess Biden-Harris handed off in January 2025: record illegal immigration, fentanyl deaths, inflation-driven cost-of-living spikes, and a ballooning national debt from unchecked spending. Trump's early second-term moves (mass deportations, border enforcement, targeted security funding, and regulatory rollbacks) are largely enforcing existing laws that Biden ignored, while addressing emergencies the prior administration created. 1. Rule of Law Was Already Eroded Under Biden – Trump's Actions Restore It Biden's team repeatedly bypassed Congress, statutes, and court rulings, creating the very "chaos" that demanded strong executive action: - Open borders defied immigration law: Biden ended Remain in Mexico, paused border wall construction, and gutted interior enforcement on day one. This led to over 7.8 million illegal encounters at the southern border plus ~1.5 million "gotaways" – the highest on record. It wasn't "compassion"; it was policy that overwhelmed Border Patrol, flooded cities with migrants, and enabled cartels. - Fentanyl crisis as a direct result: Over 100,000 annual U.S. overdose deaths (many fentanyl-related) surged under Biden, with much of the drug flowing across the unsecured border. This wasn't abstract – it killed American citizens while Biden's policies signaled weakness to traffickers. - Other overreaches: Student loan "forgiveness" defied Supreme Court rulings; vaccine mandates and regulatory expansions stretched executive power; selective DOJ enforcement (e.g., against parents at school boards vs. border chaos). Activist judges blocking Trump in term one were often partisan. Trump isn't "doing whatever he wants." He's using lawful executive authority (deportations under existing statutes, border security funding) to enforce laws Biden flouted. The Constitution grants the President broad powers on immigration and national security precisely for crises like this. Ignoring Biden's legacy while demanding Trump "follow the rules" is selective – the prior administration broke the system first. 2. Spending "Like Crazy" pales Next to Biden's Fiscal Wreckage – and Trump's Is Targeted at Fixes Biden's spending spree fueled inflation that hammered families, while Trump's early moves focus on security and waste reduction amid inherited debt: - Biden's record: His administration added roughly $6–8.4 trillion to the national debt, including the $1.9T American Rescue Plan and other bills. Cumulative inflation hit ~20%, meaning families paid an extra ~$11,000/year for the same lifestyle (groceries, gas, rent, energy). This wasn't "investment" – it was stimulus after the economy was already recovering, spiking prices and debt. - Trump's context: Early 2026 reports note some spending increases (e.g., border enforcement and "Big Beautiful Bill" elements for tax relief on tips/overtime/Social Security, plus debt ceiling adjustments). But this is dwarfed by Biden-era bloat and includes cuts to welfare, foreign aid, and clean-energy subsidies. Efforts like DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) aimed at slashing waste, though Congress controls the purse – Trump can't "cut" unilaterally. Defense/border funding addresses Biden's neglect (e.g., military readiness gaps, cartel-fueled chaos). Overall spending rose modestly in some areas because fixing a broken border and deterring threats costs money after four years of open invitations. Biden's deficits and inflation were the real "crazy" spending – it eroded wages, hit the middle class hardest, and left Trump inheriting a fiscal and security emergency. Prioritizing border security and law enforcement isn't waste; it's basic governance after Biden's policies turned cities into shelters and let drugs kill tens of thousands. Your "rule of law" argument rings hollow when Biden's policies created a humanitarian, economic, and security disaster

What ranking would you give ?

Excellent post @TonemanLives 🇺🇸 America is so close to being back once again with Donald J Trumps leadership. 🇺🇸 I appreciate your concerns pointing out Democrats despicable hatred for Americans! MAGA we must keep up the pressure on removing RINOS, Activist Judges, Lawfare, Illegals removed and passing the SAVE America Act! 🇺🇸 VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! Like our lives depend on it! 🇺🇸

Next time the Democrats call Trump a threat to Democracy, kindly remind them…. It was the Democrats who let over 20 million illegals waltz straight into our country It was the Democrats who allowed our streets to be flooded with fentanyl It was the Democrats who allowed violent gangs into our country It was the Democrats who allowed transgenders interact with our children It was the Democrats who allowed the worlds largest child trafficking ring It was the Democrats who declared war against our police It was the Democrats who mandated you to be locked up on your homes while forcing you to take a vaccine they knew had dangerous side effects Then remind them Trump closed the borders, Trump is deporting those illegals Trump ended the Maduro reign Trump is ending the Iran reign Trump has rebuilt our military to the point of domination Trump has made us all safer Trump has brought crime down to all time lows And thanks to Trump this tax season has Americans rejoicing due to much larger tax returns And the next time they say the word threat to Democracy? Remind every last one of those jerkoffs, we are a fucking Constitutional Republic and our Constitution is the law of the land! If these Democrat and RINOs don’t like it, then get the fuck out! My two cents

@Oceanbreeze473 Pathetic DEI Disaster

Four years ago today she received Senate confirmation. How would you rate her so far?

@mr_assi7 Greetings @mr_assi7, I appreciate your comment, your welcome to follow my account is open for all share their opinions, ideas, and advice. 🇺🇸

✋ YES 🇺🇸 Arguments for restricting birthright citizenship: • The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” implies full political allegiance, which some interpret as requiring at least one parent to have permanent ties (domicile) or legal status—not temporary presence or unlawful entry. • It incentivizes illegal immigration or “birth tourism” (foreign nationals traveling to the U.S. solely to secure citizenship for their child). • The U.S. is relatively unusual in offering unconditional jus soli; most countries emphasize parental citizenship or add residency requirements. • Citizenship is a “priceless” privilege that should reflect a stronger connection to the nation; changes could be made via statute or reinterpretation to deter unauthorized migration.

Raise your hand if you think the Supreme Court should BAN Birthright Citizenship! ✋ A. Yes B. No.