Yyyadney

Look who's saying! China is triggered by Australia getting a nuclear Submarine. At the same time, China, China would be building over 1000 nuclear warheads in next few years. China is the biggest aggressor, an outright liar & a shameless hypocrite!

日本经济变成今天这鬼样，我居然还看到有日本人说除了自民党以外谁都不可靠。我觉得哪怕是换只猴子来，也不至于这么烂吧

Obviously, Vijay Gokhale is ignorant about how Chinese people view Indian democracy and why they would never see it as an ideological threat. Here is the reasoning. Even if democracy can be viewed as India’s foundational pillar, significantly preventing the worst outcomes, it has also brought about suffocating, if not deadly, costs. India adopted universal suffrage democracy while still economically and socially underdeveloped, thereby legitimising many deeply entrenched pre-modern social structures, which have become institutionalised and integrated into India’s governance today. Idealists like the first prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the early Congress party envisioned oppressed social groups utilising their numerical advantage through democratic elections to create pressure groups, driving gradual social reform and overcoming entrenched societal issues, thus paving the way for economic prosperity. Unfortunately, this ideal scenario didn’t materialise. Instead, groups formed around identities such as religion, caste, sub-caste, and ethnic affiliations have engaged in “vertical mobilisation” through electoral mechanisms, reinforcing traditional social structures and preserving vested economic interests. This has resulted in an institutionalised system that further hinders social dynamism and reinforces social rigidity. Consequently, vested interest groups representing antiquated social structures legitimately hijack democratic processes, obstructing reforms beneficial to the entire society, thus significantly hampering social progress and economic development over the long term. Nevertheless, most people have no better alternative than to tolerate this situation. What type of mistakes are the most challenging to correct? Those that everyone perceives as “correct”. This encapsulates the most profound constraint that democracy imposes on India.

The issue between China and Japan isn't really about who's right or wrong — it's about who lives and who dies. From time to time, I like to repreat the reasons why China must go to war with Japan, just so no one forgets: 1. Geographically, Japan blocks the expansion of Chinese civilization toward the ocean. For thousands of years, China was an agricultural civilization, and the ocean didn't matter much. But now we're an industrial civilization, and we cannot tolerate anyone blocking China's path to the sea. 2. In the past, the main threat to Chinese civilization came from northern nomads. Today, that threat comes from the maritime peoples of the East. Japan is the forward base of the maritime civilization threatening China. Two-thirds of China's GDP is concentrated in its coastal regions — we must eliminate the threat nearby. 3. According to the cycles of Chinese history, China will weaken or even fracture again in about 200 years. When that happens, Japan will surely try to invade China again. A strong China today must eliminate that threat once and for all for future generations. 4. Over the past few thousand years, all the foreign powers who once invaded China's core territory were either destroyed or assimilated: the Xiongnu, the Turks, the Khitans, the Jurchens, the Mongols, the Manchus... they're all just chapters in history. What Japan did from 1937 to 1945 has already dug its own grave. 5. Crush Japan militarily, and Taiwan will be so scared it wets its pants — then it will agree to peaceful reunification. 6. Crush Japan militarily, and there will be no physical basis for an Asian NATO. The international order in Asia will shift overnight to a China-centered one. If we only liberated Taiwan, Japan and the US would try to form an Asian NATO. Some countries will join like Finland and Sweden join NATO after the outbreak of the Ukrainian war. 7. China just needs a perfect casus belli to declare war on Japan. The best pretext would be Japan trying to acquire nuclear weapons. China could then invoke the enemy-state clauses of the UN Charter and exercise its right as the member of UNSC to go to war against Japan. 8. Apart from nukes, the US simply does not have the physical capability to confront the PLA in Asia. As long as China doesn't attack US bases, the Americans will most likely just sit at their bases drinking coffee. There's a small chance they'd help Japan fight China — but either way, the war would be fought on Japanese soil.

I'm tired of people keep telling me why China should overthrow CPC liberalized like what was done to Eastern Bloc so I'm going to tell them what i really think once for all

This is just a simpler way of saying: "I wanted to write about ancient China but tbh it's TOO much for me and people are going to cook me alive for any historical inaccuracies, so let's just say it's inspired it to avoid that annoying discourse" Which is valid but funny.

Mao killed more of his own people than both of them combined, and he’s heralded as a great leader. All this to me sounds like “only the Chinese are allowed to kill mountains upon mountains of their own people!” Bud, Mao did more to kill Chinese people than Hirohito could have ever dreamed to.