HolderScan

🚨 Major Update: Onchain alerts directly to your Telegram Fully customizable: holder count changes, wallet balances, price moves & more Premium: up to 3 tokens with rule-sets Pro: token-agnostic rules (ANY token matching thresholds) + 1yr historical data & CSV exports

$MHGA is now verified on @HolderScan

Feels like the current meta is a straight race to the bottom with everyone chasing quick flips and avg hold times dropping lower every cycle Building something for the long term holders and communities still focused on real accumulation 👀

@0xBusto take a look at distribution of holders over time. Tons of metrics that go well in conjunction with each other

@HolderScan Tell me how to use it so i can renew subscription with you, i couldnt find a way to filter the noise well outside of bull market when i was following 10k> holders on a coin

Holder count is probably the most important metric that exists It’s a cheat code when you know exactly what you’re looking at👀

@dedmeow5 already added

@HolderScan Chads- can u add solana:GuWqNuKbaG1m84SbXBXBy9wmuepk5s7kYXRAkMeypump please?

@CryptoBartender @200lbsHORSEMEAT Full stats for Horsemeat

Hey @HolderScan can we get a full screenshot of the @200lbsHORSEMEAT stats??

$EMBLEM has been verified on @HolderScan.

If you think hold time matters, you should look into $Xavier: Renegade Angel

@MikeFlipthe500 We've kept the interpretation of what counts as a "holder" fully up to the user We don't have a fixed definition of a dust wallet Instead, we provide full context (like the $ amount breakdowns) so everyone can judge holder quality themselves

I have seen like 80% of holders are under $2 so its probably dust wallets that should not be counted in the total holder count in my opinions (or maybe under a dollar) it can be misleading when user only check the total holder count or at least make it largely irrelevant if searching true holder count In your calculation What is your definition of a dust wallet? like under $1?

As we knew already the base chain holder seemed fake and as we are preaching truth in #SPX6900 community we needed to fix it. Without curating we had 127k holders on base chain and after avoiding wallets with below $2 of $SPX the count fall on 26k holders. @HolderScan maybe you can do something about it too It’s only because I got to do it for an spx project I am working on that I am doing this otherwise if you want my opinion I don’t give a truck about holdercount as long as JOB’S NOT FINISHED I am here for years. I will be there when we’ll flip the StockMarket Anyway now you have the currated total holder count Stop Trading & Believe in something💹🧲 $SPX #SPX6900

RT @_Shadow36: Distribution. Distribution. Distribution. There will be A LOT of happy Troll holders once we make our way back to ath’s. S…

@_Shadow36 $retire $troll $buttcoin $giga $nothing 👀

Conviction looks good on you. $retire $troll $buttcoin $giga $nothing

Neet World Order

@BluntCap @el_cinna We also have the retention rate stats which take into account avg hold time and age of the token Retention = Avg hold time/Age

@el_cinna This is just a example list by @HolderScan lol.

Doesn't make sense. Buttcoin is 93 days old, so the data would snapshot holders from the first 3 days. Compare that with the other tokens mentioned they are 1-2 years old. Data doesn't mean anything if you can't interpret it meaningfully. Smells like manipulation bias 👃 Don't trust these people. $buttcoin

Delusional Bulls Will Win in the End

@ilyaeon_alt should now be fixed 🙂

Something brewing here - 500 literally attack @HolderScan not to show insane SPX diamond holders numbers to the world $SPX SPX6900

The space was at its best when community coins were leading the way

@ButtCoin $buttcoin holding strong support Tokens held 60+ days at ATHs 👀

@HolderScan How’s $Buttcoin looking?

Trending up 👀

@FrothlessPlease this is $Crypto (updated)