HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦

18.5K posts

HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦 banner
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦

HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦

@HopliteMagazine

A magazine of guns, gun rights, and related matters from a liberal leftist perspective, written by @gregcampnc

United States Katılım Ekim 2019
337 Takip Edilen378 Takipçiler
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦
@HelmerVA Calling something "common sense" is political speak for "I want to take something away from you, but I don't feel like doing the work of showing that my demand is constitutional and defensible."
English
0
0
1
6
Dan Helmer
Dan Helmer@HelmerVA·
I’m a gun owner. I respect the Second Amendment. But I can’t accept that the number one killer of children in Virginia is bullets. We can protect responsible ownership and pass common sense measures to keep our communities safe.
English
788
9
49
60.7K
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦 retweetledi
Khalil Spencer
Khalil Spencer@khalil_spencer·
ATF is pandering to certain political people. There is no reason to do this.
Pink Pistols National@PinkPistols

The Second Amendment applies to all Americans, including transgender and non-binary Americans. Nothing in federal law makes it illegal to be transgender or non-binary, which means nothing in federal law strips them of the right to purchase, keep, and bear arms. This new directive from ATF, stating that firearm purchasers shall identify themselves by their biological sex on the Firearm Transaction Record - Form 4473, forces lawful gun purchasers into an impossible bind. A transgender woman who writes ‘female’ on her Form 4473 risks being accused of providing false identifying information under the President’s order. If she instead writes ‘male,’ she risks being accused of providing identifying information that no longer matches the appearance of her lived identity, undermining the form’s stated purpose of helping law enforcement identify a purchaser. That Catch-22 is not a safety measure. It is a trap. This contradiction is especially ironic given that the ATF itself added a ‘non-binary’ option to the Form 4473 in December 2019, during President Trump’s first term. The Trump administration raised no objection at the time, or at any point before he left office in January 2021. This sudden reversal is not about policy consistency; it is about political pandering. The federal government does not get to play ‘gotcha’ with constitutional rights. Creating a paperwork contradiction designed to intimidate a minority group out of exercising a fundamental right raises serious equal-protection and due-process concerns. If the government creates conditions where the only safe option for a transgender or non-binary person is to forego gun ownership entirely, that is not regulation; that is disenfranchisement disguised as regulation. Whether the ATF’s Firearm Transaction Record - Form 4473 can survive post-Bruen constitutional scrutiny is an open question. What is not in question is that the Constitution does not permit the federal government to target a class of citizens for second-tier rights. Operation Blazing Sword - Pink Pistols will continue to oppose any policy that attempts to do so. independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…

English
1
1
4
63
🩺 Dr. Napervillain Bunny🐰
@PinkPistols @eugeneweekly I don't disagree with your stance. I also don't think it's that complicated: biological sex is pretty clear for 99.99 percent of the population. The rest have mental illness. Also: abolish the 4473.
English
3
1
22
375
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦 retweetledi
lottaguns
lottaguns@lottaguns·
@PinkPistols @eugeneweekly Wouldn't it be something if it were the Pink Pistols that caused the 4473 to be abolished? Irony so thick that you need a spoon.
English
1
1
7
300
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦 retweetledi
Pink Pistols National
Pink Pistols National@PinkPistols·
The Second Amendment applies to all Americans, including transgender and non-binary Americans. Nothing in federal law makes it illegal to be transgender or non-binary, which means nothing in federal law strips them of the right to purchase, keep, and bear arms. This new directive from ATF, stating that firearm purchasers shall identify themselves by their biological sex on the Firearm Transaction Record - Form 4473, forces lawful gun purchasers into an impossible bind. A transgender woman who writes ‘female’ on her Form 4473 risks being accused of providing false identifying information under the President’s order. If she instead writes ‘male,’ she risks being accused of providing identifying information that no longer matches the appearance of her lived identity, undermining the form’s stated purpose of helping law enforcement identify a purchaser. That Catch-22 is not a safety measure. It is a trap. This contradiction is especially ironic given that the ATF itself added a ‘non-binary’ option to the Form 4473 in December 2019, during President Trump’s first term. The Trump administration raised no objection at the time, or at any point before he left office in January 2021. This sudden reversal is not about policy consistency; it is about political pandering. The federal government does not get to play ‘gotcha’ with constitutional rights. Creating a paperwork contradiction designed to intimidate a minority group out of exercising a fundamental right raises serious equal-protection and due-process concerns. If the government creates conditions where the only safe option for a transgender or non-binary person is to forego gun ownership entirely, that is not regulation; that is disenfranchisement disguised as regulation. Whether the ATF’s Firearm Transaction Record - Form 4473 can survive post-Bruen constitutional scrutiny is an open question. What is not in question is that the Constitution does not permit the federal government to target a class of citizens for second-tier rights. Operation Blazing Sword - Pink Pistols will continue to oppose any policy that attempts to do so. independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…
English
0
7
30
911
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦 retweetledi
Pink Pistols National
Pink Pistols National@PinkPistols·
@eugeneweekly (3/3) However, it appears that the ATF was instead planning to unveil it along with a host of other new rules and hope it didn't get noticed. Well, we noticed. The opinion of Operation Blazing Sword - Pink Pistols has not changed since 20 November 2025.
English
1
1
15
721
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦 retweetledi
Pink Pistols National
Pink Pistols National@PinkPistols·
@eugeneweekly (2/3) Ms. Palette crafted a press release as an official answer, then waited for the ATF's rule to make national news. When that didn't come, she hoped that the ATF had decided to drop the issue.
Pink Pistols National tweet media
English
1
2
15
1.1K
HopliteMagazine 💉x7🌹🇺🇦
@kinsmed @fred_guttenberg "My goodness"? Even your cursing is weak. All you've done here is show that you don't understand the subject. But that's common for gun control advocates, and experience tells me that I won't be able to reason you out of a position you didn't reach through reason.
English
1
0
0
10