Name Bunchanumbers

@Roman05Killua @KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper There's no point in discussing the potential baby if the mother's welfare afterwards is never mentioned or considered. Death is not the worst outcome. Even though it does happen... Alot. Most just become handicapped because their bodies can't handle it. But again y'all don't care

@HouseHoslow @KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper Not even remotely close to what he said. There’s no point discussing what happens to the baby once it’s born if we can’t even agree to NOT KILL IT. Any damage would have been done already. The birth will not kill her.

If I’m reading this correctly you are completely fine with a child getting raped and then impregnated and having through the horrors of child birth as a child. I am beyond words. Why does this have 11k likes.

@GidgetSpinner @shooter45689 @KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper I didn't say she was gonna die. Many don't. The one I know still walks with a walker to this day. 20yrs later can't walk straight. Ruined her schooling. She lived but her body is just an incubator to people like you... Y'all fuck these kids worse than the rapists

@HouseHoslow @shooter45689 @KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper I literally just said abort if the mother's life is in danger. Can you read?

@GidgetSpinner @shooter45689 @KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper Why do you think the abortion is because of the crimes of the would-be father? It has nothing to do with him. This is the welfare of the mother. But it seems you don't care for her welfare. She doesn't concern you or anyone that thinks like you, is her body only for children?

@shooter45689 @KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper If it would result in a death 99% of the time, i.e the child was like 5 years old. Obviously you dont have them give birth. If they were like 16 which is where most of these teen pregnancies occur, then they can deliver and you shouldnt kill the baby for the crimes of the dad.

@KrangusDumfhart @AquaticFlapper What you're saying is you don't give a damn about the mother in this scenario. When her development is irreparably stunted and or her body damaged? That's no concern of yours. Who raises the baby? Not your concern. All you care for is kill the rapist and the would be child.

@AquaticFlapper No one is "fine" with a child getting raped, we just don't think we should kill a baby because their father is a rapist. A baby is not guilty of a crime just because of the crimes of its parents.

@c_h_e_m @AquaticFlapper Well, a 10yr Old's body will be irreparably harmed by carrying another human full term so I'm guessing the 10yr old no longer has any value and the developing human takes precedence. Even though the pregnancy was against her will. That's the reality of what you're saying here.

@AquaticFlapper For fock sake. Nobody is fine with a child being raped. Rapists should be skinned alive. What Charlie said was that in the scenario that there was NO RISK (important point you ignore (the woman said give birth and live)) the baby should be delivered.

@DrakeAD3 @MelGlbsonFan82 Same... Cuz what the actual fuck....

@MelGlbsonFan82 Me watching YouTube when I'm suddenly notified about this for some reason!

@LeeStew05802633 @arealmermaid2 @TheJay_Thompson @elonmusk This has to be the most garbage I've heard all day... And this is twitter, home of garbage takes

@arealmermaid2 @TheJay_Thompson @elonmusk Fascism is a reactionary movement. It is an immune response to Marxism. Fascism will not exist in a healthy and sane society. If you see fascism rising, then their are Marxists instigating in society.

😑

@skimmer2 @notcapnamerica Iran didn't deny inspectors until trump tore up the deal. Don't be an idiot

@notcapnamerica Iran signed the deal and then denied entry of nuclear inspectors. Then the talking point was that they can monitor it without inspectors on the ground.

So let me see if I understand this correctly. Barack Obama negotiated a deal with Iran that lifted sanctions on their country and exchange for international monitoring of their weapons program along with several other concessions. Donald Trump came into office and unilaterally blew up that deal. Now a decade leader in his second term, Donald Trump has without the approval of Congress initiated an unprovoked military attack on Iran, and in order to end said conflict is demanding Iran comply with a number of self serving proposals, many of which were already covered under Obama’s initial deal. Did I leave anything out?

@PimpnShrtSelrs @Pro__Trading That oil is no longer unsanctioned lol

@Pro__Trading Bro Iran will earn 10 billion extra a year from tolls and an additional 60 billion a year from sellling Unsanctioned oil. Remember, tankers considered the Straight International waters and never paid tolls before the war. GREAT JOB TRUMP you just made Iran very wealthy

UPDATE: Iran has AGREED to open the Strait for two weeks. Absolute masterclass by Trump. He got the Strait open without any help from Europe and without any boots on the ground. Wow.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau You could just say you don't know. That's fine. The US wasn't there just to watch the oil. They were actively pushing for Iraq to beat Iran, providing intel and arms sir. And that's why warships were very trigger happy against Iranian assets.

@HouseHoslow @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau Yeah, you're amazing..your persistent misinformation was a big key.

Israel hits the USS Liberty in '67 and it's “Never Forget” even though they apologized and paid reparations. Kuwait downs three of our jets last month and it's just “Fog of war, pass the hummus.” Almost like the outrage is never about the incident but who did it.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau As long as you can acknowledge "it's your fault I killed you" is not something that's said by normal people. And that's what Reagan did

@HouseHoslow @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau We're done, right?

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau

That's largely an opinion not a fact. You are correct about the transponder, but nothing prevents a hostile actor from using a civilian mode. In fact it was established, at the time, that Iranian military aircraft could transmit in both military and civilian modes. Hence, the radio calls, that went unanswered.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau You have yet to acknowledge that victim blaming is not acknowledging anything.

Your narrative was incorrect about the Iranian airline. You have yet to acknowledge your misrepresentation of the facts. Now you, again, want to shift the story, now to the Iran-Iraq war. It is generally understood Iraq was the aggressor in that war. Hussein launched the attack to seize Iranian oil fields. He was trying to take advantage of the chaos in Iran during/after its Revolution. Hussein also feared the Iranian revolution would embolden Iraqi Shiites (the majority in Iraq) and the Revolution would spill over into Iraq. Hussein used a lot of Shiites to fight in Iran. The US played both sides, but was not an aggressor in that war. Again, a reminder of where this started:

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau Where was that "established"? Yeah we know, Americans and Israelis sucker punch their opponents all the time it seems. The ideal action was to leave the vicinity but Americans can't fathom giving ground for some reason even when it's not their land or waters.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau Leaving was the appropriate action. The civilian aircraft also had a civilian transponder and was using a known route. The crew knew it wasn't an F14.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau The US was the aggressor. The Iran Iraq war was a war stoked by the US, who armed and unleashed Iraq on Iran. That's why the warship was there. Are we forgetting that little tidbit. The US started that war! Again, the US has zero jurisdiction over Iranian aircrafts in Iran. Leave

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau The aircraft was shot down in its own airspace on its own local route (as per the reports). I'm trying to figure out how or why they'd be in danger in their own airspace. Does the US have the right or responsibility to shoot down aircrafts in their own airspace?

Iran was very well aware of an ongoing conflict in the Persian Gulf. It could've/should've redirected that plane away from hostilities. Contrary to your previous post (wrong again) the US did issue and reissue a NOTAM for that area. The Vincennes attempted to call the Iranian jet and got no response. The US in that situation took a defensive posture and regrettably shot down a civilian aircraft. Acknowledged it immediately, and paid restitution/reparations.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau Some? Iran arrested their officers for negligence. The US victim blamed the Iranians who rightfully ignored a US ship because they were in their own airspace and have no accountability to US forces, then settled out of court and did nothing beyond that. That's not acknowledging

The US paid. How is that not accepting some responsibility? At issue was the criminality aspect. The US never denied shooting the airline down, it never blamed rogue US elements. Reagan issued an immediate statement and a report by the US Navy, was shared with the world a little over a month later.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau If you go victim blaming, it's not an acknowledgement. "Its unfortunate but it's your fault we shot you down" is not an acknowledgement. It's bullshit

@HouseHoslow @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau See where this started: you were wrong about US acknowledgement, You were wrong about the case settlement, it was not 2016. The US settled with Iran in 1996, and paid families. The 2016 case was not tied to the downing of the airline.

@mbatiato22 @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau So could the US but neither seem to wanna settle that debt. Why would Iran negotiate with someone who attacks them while at the negotiating table. You do know agreements under duress have zero legal standing right???

@HouseHoslow @JordyVanDemLemb @ChrisLoesch @MaxNordau My response: Iran has largely rejected negation talks on restitution/reparations. If Iran wanted to pay, it could, sanctions certainly create barriers, but the biggest barrier Iran, and it's blameshifting and its stalling/ unwillingness to negotiate.