حامد الفيحاني الرويبي

@eood1010gm1 مصيرنا كلنا بين هالقبور دنيا فانيه اسال الله العظيم رب العرش العظيم ان يرحمه ويغفرله ويسكنه الفردوس الاعلى من الجنة وان الله يربط و يمسح على قلبك في فقد غاليك وعليك بالصدقه وأفضلها سقيا الماء للبشر و للشجر وللطيور تراها توصله فلا تقطعونه من هذا الوصل

بين اتربة القبور الهاًدئة هناًك ( أبي ) 💔

@oxb_5 ازرعي فيها مخافة الله وراح تحصدين الثمار الطيبة في الدنيا والاخرة ☺️

عندي مساحه فارغه بقلبي وش ازرع فيها 😂 😚

@QOn09 ارحموا من في الارض يرحمكم من في السماء 😩

كذا استوت والا ارجعها الفرن ؟!🤣😂😅👇

@alshri3030 دمت بقلب نقي لا يفقده حسن الظن، وعين فطنة لا تفاجئها الخيانة 🫶🏻

#كوفي_سوالف العدو موقعه ثابت، أما الخطر الحقيقي فهو من صديق يغيّر موقعه دون أن تشعر. دردشه سريعة . ١- العدو الواضح أقل خطورة. ٢-كيف نوازن بين حسن الظن والحذر؟ ٣- هل نعيد الثقة بعد أن يهتز مفهوم “القريب”؟ twitter.com/i/spaces/1RJZz…

@MariahAlsubaiee @SaudiNews50 غطرفي يابنت وارمي علينا بالورود وارقدي بامان رب السماوات العلى 🇸🇦

@SaudiNews50 الله يحفظ شرقيتنا مالهم هم الا حنا… الله يعز حكامنا..و يجزاهم خير و الجنود الابطال…

عاجل: من جديد.. اعتراض وتدمير مسيّرة في المنطقة الشرقية.

So you’ve never heard a Christian scream "in the name of Jesus Christ" before taking a life? Then you’ve clearly never opened a history book. Let me educate you: · The Crusades: Where were the "good Christians" when Crusaders slaughtered 70,000 Muslims inside Al-Aqsa Mosque in 1099? They butchered infants, women, and the elderly while shouting "Deus lo vult" — "God wills it." In the name of Christ. · The Inquisition: Where was the condemnation when the Church tortured and burned thousands of people alive "in the name of Jesus Christ"? The Catholic Church literally issued death sentences for "heresy" and lit the fires while holding the cross. · The Wars of Religion: The Thirty Years’ War slaughtered 8 million Europeans. Christian against Christian. Lutheran against Catholic. All fighting under the banner of Christ. · Colonialism: Where were the voices of "good Christians" when European colonizers wiped out entire civilizations in Africa and the Americas under the banner of spreading the Gospel? The Pope himself blessed the Portuguese and Spanish conquests. · The Genocide of Native Americans: Millions exterminated. Land stolen. Children forcibly taken. All justified by the Church’s doctrine of Discovery — in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. And let’s not forget Northern Ireland. Sectarian murder. Catholics and Protestants killing each other for decades while invoking Jesus. The IRA and Loyalist paramilitaries didn’t forget to pray before pulling the trigger. So spare me the outrage about Muslims "not condemning" terrorism. Muslims are the primary victims of terrorism. They fill the ranks of counter-terrorism forces worldwide. They issue condemnations after every attack — condemnations your media chooses to ignore because they don’t fit your narrative. But here’s the real question: Why do you demand that 1.8 billion Muslims answer for the acts of a fringe minority, while you’ve never once demanded that Christians answer for centuries of genocide, inquisition, and colonial slaughter carried out explicitly in the name of Jesus Christ? The problem isn’t religion. The problem is your hypocrisy. You see a speck in the eye of Muslims while ignoring the log in the eye of your own history. Think twice before parroting that tired, ignorant talking point again. History has receipts.

@Hsa503 @DoctorNazarian Quite often we hear the saying that "not all Muslims are terrorists" yet it's so hard to see the so called good Muslims condemn terrorists acts of these radicals. Since I was born I have never heard a Christian scream "in the name of Jesus Christ" before taking someone's life.

I grew up in Iran, a Muslim-ruled country, under a regime that killed its own people. That’s not a political opinion. That’s my lived experience. So when I speak about it, I’m not being Islamophobic. I’m being honest. The people of Iran know the truth. They’re living it every day. It’s time we stop being afraid to say it out loud.

¬°•|[ شيخ شيوخ قبيلة سبيع الغلباء كوير بن راشد رحمه الله ]|•°¬ facebook.com/permalink.php?…

Your words carry the warmth of someone who truly belongs, not just by place, but by heart. Saudi Arabia is not just a land people live in… it becomes part of who they are — in their memories, in their values, in their sense of home. Loyalty like this is not taught, it is felt. And what you expressed reflects a beautiful kind of gratitude that only those who truly experienced it can understand. May that bond always remain strong, and may kindness always be returned with kindness. 🫶🏻

I will not attack Saudi arabia I will not attack Saudi arabia I will not attack Saudi arabia I will not attack Saudi arabia I will not attack the country I lived in and grew up in, where I ate from its bounty and drank from its water and played in its streets; rather, I will stand by it with everything I have out of loyalty and belonging

سلمت يداك اختي بنت طويق فعلا ليس كل قائدٍ يُختبر في الأزمات، لكن القادة الحقيقيين هم من يصنعون من الأزمات موازين جديدة للعالم. حين تضطرب المنطقة، وتعلو الأصوات نحو المواجهة، يظهر الفرق بين من يقود بالعاطفة… ومن يقود بالبصيرة. فالقوة ليست في إطلاقها، بل في القدرة على كبحها حين يكون في ذلك حفظٌ للأوطان وصونٌ لمصالح الشعوب. هنا تتجلى القيادة التي لا تبحث عن المجد في ضجيج الحروب، بل في صناعة الاستقرار، وترسيخ الهيبة، وبناء مستقبلٍ لا تهزّه العواصف. لقد أثبت سيدي صاحب السمو الملكي الامير / محمد بن سلمان أن الحكمة ليست ترددًا، وأن الحزم لا يعني التهور، بل هو مزيجٌ نادر من قوةٍ واعية، ورؤيةٍ بعيدة، وقرارٍ يُوزن بميزان وطنٍ بأكمله. فكان الحاضر أمانًا… والمستقبل ثقة… والمكانة تزداد رسوخًا في أعين العالم. الحمد لله على نعمة قيادةٍ تعرف متى تُظهر القوة… ومتى تصنع بها السلام 🇸🇦✨

الزعيم الحكيم القوي الامين : ليس الإعجاب وحده ما يصنع هذا الحديث، بل واقع تثبته المواقف. حين واجهت بلادنا التحديات، كان الخيار بيده: قوة قادرة على الرد وعزم لا يُستهان به… لكنه اختار ما هو أعظم. قوةٌ تحمي، وذكاءٌ يوازن، وحكمةٌ تجنّب الأوطان ويلات الحروب. لم ينجرّ للضغوط، ولم يغامر بمصير المنطقة، بل قدّم استقرارها على كل اعتبار. النتيجة؟ وطنٌ آمن، ومكانةٌ تزداد رسوخًا، وصوتٌ يُحسب له ألف حساب. الحمدلله على نعمة الأمير محمد بن سلمان 🇸🇦 #السعودية_العظمى #زعيم_الشرق_الأوسط #محمد_بن_سلمان

@TalaOsseiran1 تخلصو من النفوذ الايراني داخل اروقة الحكومة وخاصة الاحزاب كحزب الشيطان وغيره ونحن جاهزون حكومة وشعباً

This claim lacks credibility and appears to be driven by speculation rather than verified facts. Saudi Arabia’s international relations — particularly its strategic ties with Pakistan — are built on long-standing cooperation, mutual respect, and institutional coordination, not sudden, reactionary decisions. Under the leadership of Mohammed bin Salman, the Kingdom operates with calculated diplomacy and clear communication channels — not through “unreachable officials” narratives that belong more to rumor mills than reality. Spreading unverified claims about sensitive bilateral relations only serves to mislead audiences and undermine serious geopolitical discourse. Facts matter. Credibility matters more.

BREAKING: Saudi Arabia has reportedly asked Pakistan to repay a USD 6.3 billion loan after Pakistan failed to honor the bilateral defense pact, under which an attack on one is considered an attack on both. Saudi officials are reportedly unable to reach Pakistan’s PM & army chief.

Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of Mohammed bin Salman, has demonstrated a calculated and disciplined approach amid rising regional tensions. While provocations and indirect escalations attempt to drag the Kingdom into a broader confrontation, Riyadh has chosen restraint over reaction — prioritizing stability, economic security, and the protection of global energy markets. Iran’s pattern of escalation appears aimed at widening the conflict and reshaping regional dynamics through pressure and disruption. However, Saudi Arabia’s response reflects strategic maturity: avoiding impulsive engagement while maintaining a firm defensive posture. This is not weakness — it is statecraft. At a time when the region stands at a critical crossroads, Saudi Arabia is positioning itself not as a participant in chaos, but as a stabilizing force with global responsibility. The message is clear: escalation will not dictate policy — strategy will. #SaudiArabia #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #MBS #Iran #Stability

This entire narrative is based on anonymous sources and selective leaks—hardly solid evidence. Saudi Arabia’s official and documented policy has consistently emphasized de-escalation, regional stability, and diplomacy, not dragging the region into endless wars. In fact, Saudi Arabia has: •Restored diplomatic relations with Iran •Repeatedly called for restraint and political solutions •Refused to let its territory be used to escalate conflicts So the real question is: Why ignore official positions and rely instead on unverified claims from unnamed sources? Serious analysis is based on facts and policy, not rumors designed to provoke reactions. Reducing Saudi Arabia’s strategy to “war advocacy” only shows a lack of understanding of how real-world geopolitics actually works.

According to a report by The New York Times, citing people briefed by American officials on the conversations, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman has been urging US President Donald Trump to continue the war on Iran, framing the ongoing US-Israeli war as a "historic opportunity" to reshape the Middle East. In a series of calls, people familiar with the conversations said that Bin Salman reportedly pushed for the "destruction" of Iran's government, arguing that Iran "poses a long-term threat to the #Gulf that can only be eliminated by getting rid of the government." At the same time, senior officials in both governments are said to fear that prolonging the war on Iran could leave the United States "stuck in an endless war". The New York Times further added that Crown Prince Bin Salman suggested to the #US the idea of "putting troops in Iran to seize energy infrastructure and force the government out of power, according to the people briefed by US officials." #IranWar #warOnIran #SaudiArabia

@Shirink_13 This is not analysis—this is ignorance dressed as opinion. Saudi Arabia acts based on national security and regional stability, not sectarian slogans. Reducing complex geopolitics to “Sunni vs Shia” only exposes how little you actually understand.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman urged President Trump to continue striking Iran. SA didn't support the Palestinians because they are Sunni. SA didn't support Iranians because they are Shia. SA only supports Zionists, and then we should consider them Muslim leaders.

@kwt_two ○ حامد ○ الفيحاني ○ السبيعي 🫶🏻

أسمك في تويتر ؟. ○ حقيقي ○ مستعار ○ لقب.

@fiahin ونعم والله يابني عمنا وعسى جمعاكم و افراحكم دايمه ومن العايدين

تغطية لحفل معايدة الفياحين