万币侯杰克马.hl
523 posts

万币侯杰克马.hl
@Hypeee888
目标:手握10K $HYPE 🎯 | Allin Hyperliquid | 一起通往A9之路| $HYPE 传教士 | $HYPE = $1000

Open interest on Trade[XYZ] just crossed $2B. Open interest on Trade[XYZ] is up 793% since the start of 2026.

@Henrik_on_HL Someone tell this guy to reach out to me!


$HYPE We’ve been holding around $38 for a while now. The longer price holds under resistance without dumping, the more likely we break higher later. But I’d be careful here, especially with all the manipulation lately. Wouldnt be surprised to see a move into $35–34 first to punish late longs and grab liquidity before any real breakout.


收获了很多好评和感动的一次VIP活动 Happy Ending啦❤️ 没能来到的VIP朋友们,欢迎联系app内客户经理报名 vip1+ 都有机会来参与我们的OKX VIP 环球游学行🫰🏻



Circle was asleep while many millions of USDC was swapped via CCTP from Solana to Ethereum for hours from the 9 figure Drift hack during US hours. Value was moved and nothing was done yet again. Comes days after you froze 16+ business hot wallets incompetently which is still being slowly unfrozen. @circle @jerallaire @usdc are bad actors for the industry.


关于 $HYPE 有多早期: 站内总持币地址23万,然而 ▶︎ 持有 $HYPE > 10枚,仅5万多地址 ▶︎ 持有 $HYPE > 100枚,仅2万多地址 @HyperliquidX

说到底还是 @circle 不确定自己「执法」的边界应该在哪里。 若是充当严厉的裁判员,遇到具有不法特征的行为就冻结,在缺少具体规则边界下,势必会让Usdc用户对 @circle 丧失一些信心,因为用户无法明确的知道自己的稳定币会不会哪天也被冻结。 尽管,不好的事情发生后可能有人会去骂一骂,但这对@circle 带来的损失是可控的且是阶段性的,一阵风就过去了。 而充当严厉的裁判员所带来的潜在后果则可能是长期的/无法承担的。 所以 @circle 就只能这么做,两眼一遮,假装事情没看到和不存在了。

说到底还是 @circle 不确定自己「执法」的边界应该在哪里。 若是充当严厉的裁判员,遇到具有不法特征的行为就冻结,在缺少具体规则边界下,势必会让Usdc用户对 @circle 丧失一些信心,因为用户无法明确的知道自己的稳定币会不会哪天也被冻结。 尽管,不好的事情发生后可能有人会去骂一骂,但这对@circle 带来的损失是可控的且是阶段性的,一阵风就过去了。 而充当严厉的裁判员所带来的潜在后果则可能是长期的/无法承担的。 所以 @circle 就只能这么做,两眼一遮,假装事情没看到和不存在了。

Circle was asleep while many millions of USDC was swapped via CCTP from Solana to Ethereum for hours from the 9 figure Drift hack during US hours. Value was moved and nothing was done yet again. Comes days after you froze 16+ business hot wallets incompetently which is still being slowly unfrozen. @circle @jerallaire @usdc are bad actors for the industry.

说到底还是 @circle 不确定自己「执法」的边界应该在哪里。 若是充当严厉的裁判员,遇到具有不法特征的行为就冻结,在缺少具体规则边界下,势必会让Usdc用户对 @circle 丧失一些信心,因为用户无法明确的知道自己的稳定币会不会哪天也被冻结。 尽管,不好的事情发生后可能有人会去骂一骂,但这对@circle 带来的损失是可控的且是阶段性的,一阵风就过去了。 而充当严厉的裁判员所带来的潜在后果则可能是长期的/无法承担的。 所以 @circle 就只能这么做,两眼一遮,假装事情没看到和不存在了。

我比较赞同ZachXBT的观点,Circle可以选择不干预,我没有资格去指责它,但Circle可能没有意识到一点,他们是最快最有效的可以阻止这种行为的一方,真正的监管还很难渗透到这个位置。 USDC最有优势的战场也在链上,特别在defi当中,如果Circle不出手,市场丢失信心,USDC也会逐渐失去这个领先位置。









