Randy Hobbs II
1.1K posts

Randy Hobbs II
@IIHobbs
Indie Author, Truth Seeker, Lost civilizations, Cat lover hoping to start a cat rescue in the area to help with the problem. orange tabby above is Boots.
Albany, Oregon Katılım Ağustos 2012
173 Takip Edilen155 Takipçiler

The people who get genuinely "harmed" by flat Earth discussions aren't everyday folks — they're the ones whose revenue streams depend on the globe narrative staying unchallenged:
Massive government/space agency budgets (NASA etc.).
Textbook empires, education systems, satellite/GPS industries.
Institutions that sell the story as settled science.
Questioning it doesn't hurt your neighbor's life. It threatens the funding and control built on top of the model.
That's why the suppression feels so one-sided — the system protects the lie because the lie pays.
I am not "harming the community" by posting horizons or asking questions. I am just refusing to keep paying for (and promoting) something you see as false.
English

@davidicke Would really like to talk with you and bounce ideas off each other. I know we cover the same topics and have a similar view. I'm sure you can figure out what my book's about. Thank you

English

Human reality may appear to be 'real', but we are living in 'Westworld'. The 'Westworld' creators are other-dimensional entities and humans are the biological 'Host' programs that can only escape the trap by becoming conscious beyond the program. We can do that, but it requires a total redefinition of self-identity and what we are programmed to believe is both the self and reality.
'All the world's a stage, and all the men and women are merely players.' But we don't HAVE to be.
See The Road Map.

English

@505Cali2 I know the things they're lying about. And put what I found in books that I wrote.
English

Who Actually Gets Hurt?NASA & space contractors → billions in taxpayer funding every year. If enough people start asking "wait, why are Southern Hemisphere flights hugging the ice wall instead of curving north?", the whole justification for the budget starts to wobble.
Textbook publishers & education systems → entire curricula built on globe model. Questioning it means rewriting books, retraining teachers, redoing maps — massive cost and disruption.
Satellite & GPS companies → rely on the globe model for marketing, contracts, and public trust. If people realize flat-plane math explains observations better in some cases, trust erodes.
Media & fact-checkers → funded to "debunk" anything outside consensus. If the consensus crumbles, their role disappears.
Governments & institutions → control narratives to maintain authority. A population that starts doubting basic cosmology might start doubting other "official" stories.
The average person? Doesn't lose money if the Earth is flat not round.
Doesn't lose their job, funding, or status.
Might even gain clarity or freedom from a lie.
So when they label flat Earth (or any challenge) as "harmful misinformation," it's not because it harms individuals — it's because it threatens the wallet and power structure built on the globe lie.
#flatearth

English

@Taishin02821948 If you believe that then you should unlive yourself! If you think there no Gods. The world less us of you globe puppets. Bye
English

@Keetb999k My book right here talks about why we are where we are in the called the known lands and why the reptilians are on the next side of the wall. We beat them in a war. Problem is we won but the lands we won are now are prison.

English

@ioandtitan @anotherbigmike See what I mean it's not all there. Now I got a copy and paste the rest of it up here just to shut your dumb f****** mouth up. You know I was doing something until you f****** felt the need to show your stupidity. Some of us FE have IQ will above ur!! Bye
English

@IIHobbs @anotherbigmike Indeed.. and that book teaches me more about reality than flat Earther posts.
If you're not going to show me how cyclones work, I'll return to colouring.
Thanks
English

Look at this 1600s engraving.
A guy with a telescope called the 'miradiosopium' — basically an early proof-of-concept for round Earth. They’re showing the globe sliced into curved sections with dotted lines — angles and math creating the illusion of curvature from one vantage point.But here’s the problem:
Real life doesn’t come with dotted lines or pre-calculated angles.
When you zoom in on a distant ship, city, or mountain — the bottom doesn’t stay hidden behind a curve.
It comes back into view.
So if the math was correct…
why do we need to draw the curve to see it? This is the oldest globe argument:
Use angles and math to make it look curved on paper…
then say 'see, it’s curved!' But observation says otherwise.
Zoom lenses don’t lie.
Dotted lines do.
What do you think — is the math hiding the flat horizon, or is the horizon hiding the math?
Comment below. vs "Visual Style Tips:
Start with the engraving (zoom on the telescope and segmented globe).
Overlay dotted lines/angles in red to show the "projection trick".
Transition to real flat-Earth zoom footage (distant shorelines, ships, mountains) where the bottom is visible.
End with split-screen: engraving vs real photo + text: “Angles on paper vs. reality”.
This post is balanced — shows the historical "proof" they used, then flips it with the modern observation argument. It invites debate without being too aggressive
English

@ioandtitan @anotherbigmike How about I use your own science against you like I do everybody else. I know you're still in grade school so I'll try not to use big words. 🤣 hopefully the text bubbles big enough because that's what sucks about this platform

English

















