Sabitlenmiş Tweet
MAKY
3.4K posts
@JonJason93 Jonathon, it’s not that big of a deal. You reposted yourself being absolutely roasted by Matt Walsh, laughing at it. I didn’t see you were taking it so serious. Sorry.
English
@IIIMAKYIII Why the hell are you going so hard to insult me? Do I know you? Suck your bitch mother’s dick faggot.
English
@JonJason93 I’m 40, celebrating 20 years of a successful marriage. My wife sure hopes I will always look like this you fucking fat loser
English
@IIIMAKYIII Do you know Matt or something? Why are you so offended? I can lose weight you’ll always look like that.
English
English
@cravvememe @Ahshanti They used the money to buy a houses and 2 luxury people. You have to realize just how DUMB Karmelo and his family are.
English
@semxjschaos @I_amZackk @TMZ @JMaine518 Ok, now hypothetically swap both people to black or both people to white. Does your logic hold up or would that change your opinion at all?
In every scenario, regardless of skin color, I know my answer and it doesn’t change at all.
English
English
🚨 LMFAO! President Trump SMIRKS as liberals BOO him at Madison Square Garden during the National Anthem
While he's saluting the flag, the Democrats are jeering 🤡
It's NYC, he expected that, look at that smile 😂
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt We already went over. It has nothing to do with Trump. You are denying potential fraud because of your hatred for a man that has nothing to do with the election because you are fucking retarded. You should have moved on hours ago. Good job figuring that obvious thing out.
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Nope, that would be you. Nothing about those numbers are abnormal. You just don’t want to accept the fact that there’s no evidence of fraud. You must believe there’s fraud because your orange daddy says there’s fraud. Good luck with that. I’m moving on with my life. 👍
English
"A net swing of more than 43,000 votes since Tuesday.."
43,000, huh? Where have I seen that number before...?
Probably nothing. 🤷
Matthew Seedorff@MattSeedorff
BREAKING: In the latest ballot count, City Councilwoman @nithyavraman has passed @spencerpratt for second place in the Los Angeles mayoral race. If the count ended today, Raman would advance to the November runoff against Mayor @MayorOfLA. On election night, Pratt led Raman by about 40,000 votes—roughly a 10-point advantage. As of tonight, Raman now leads Pratt by about 3,100 votes, a net swing of more than 43,000 votes since Tuesday.
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt It does. You are just retarded. We already established that as a fact
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt It doesn’t actually. I’m not really sure why it’s an issue she got similar amount of votes to the current mayor. They’re the same party and they both got twice as many as Pratt which aligns with the breakdown of voter parties. You’re just really bullshitting.
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt I’m not going to repeat myself. I already told you and your data backs up exactly why I said before. You are just retarded.
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt You really don’t see the issue? It’s staring you right in the face. Holy shit you are so fucking dumb
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Below are two screenshots. First from end of day 6/3 and second is right now 6/8. Difference in votes in 5 days:
Bass: 103,272
Raman: 118,728
Pratt: 56,608
Registered Democrats: 1.22 million Registered Republicans: 326,292
That’s an almost 4:1 ratio.
Explain the problem.
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt The abnormal thing is the amount of votes she got in comparison to him AND the current mayor. Holy shit you are dumb. The fraud happens BEFORE the counting. I don’t give a shit about publicly counting a fraudulent vote. You are dense
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt No, it’s insane because my brain functions on logic and facts. Your guy dropping into 3rd place as California very publicly counts ballots is not evidence of fraud. At all . If it were abnormal for a Republican to be losing in LA, I’d give you that but it isn’t abnormal.
English
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Dude, counting ballots isn’t fraud just because your guy got less ballots in favor of him. Thats actually insane to say that. The live stream cameras are there, the count is open to observation to the public. There has to be more than “there’s fraud because Pratt is losing”
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt I did. One is numbers of names in a file that have been investigated. The other is numbers of mail in ballots that look like possible fraud. Backed up by democrats fighting against the save act. I’m arguing that they need to investigate it as much as they did Trump.
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt You actually didn’t answer my question before. You deflected. In both scenarios I presented, the facts were just numbers but in one case you don’t think it’s sufficient evidence to make a claim and in the other case, you do think it’s sufficient evidence to make a claim.
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt I did answer your question. You didn’t like my answer. It’s not the same thing. No matter how much you want it to be. If you compared the Epstein files to an election fraud investigation then you might have a point. But that will never happen because democrats don’t want it.
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Why can’t you answer my question? You need more evidence to believe that claim about Trump but need no more evidence than Raman getting more votes than Pratt to believe there’s fraud. You don’t see how that doesn’t make any sense?
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Trump signed the release of the Epstein files. Democrats are fighting against the save act. They don’t want fair elections while Trump wanted the files released. His name being mentioned that many times is evidence, just not the evidence you wanted. Both look bad for Democrats
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt So Trump’s name mentioned over 10 times more than anyone else other than Epstein is not proof that he’s a pedophile. You need evidence. But there being more mail in ballots for Raman than Pratt because Democrats use them more is all the evidence you need to claim fraud?
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Why do you mention the amount of times his name was mentioned and not what those mentions were? 38,000 times and you don’t want to be specific about any of the “proof”.
It’s because there is no proof and you know it. So you fall back on the number. Pathetic
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt No. What does that have to do with this fraud? Thanks for proving my point that you don’t actually care about the election fraud and just hate Trump because you are a fucking retard.
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Does Trump’s name being in the Epstein files over 38,000 times make him a pedophile?
English
@GG7xo @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt That’s not what happened. Trump talked about it way after it was already a thing. You just hate him so much, that’s when you noticed it because you are a retard. Everyone else has been talking about for days.
English
@IIIMAKYIII @KariLynnMyers @spencerpratt Yes because he’s the one that started claiming fraud and all of you followed suit. You really trying to claim to me if he had said nothing and said the election is secure, that you’d all still be claiming this? Absolutely not.
English