Finished

3.6K posts

Finished

Finished

@IONTechION

The account has been closed.

Katılım Haziran 2022
295 Takip Edilen4.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
This account will no longer be used.
English
1
0
3
398
Burcun Ne?
Burcun Ne?@NeBurcusun·
DOĞUM TARİHİNİ YAZ SANA NİSAN BİTMEDEN HAYATINDA NE DEĞİŞECEĞİNİ TEK CÜMLEYLE SÖYLEYEYİM (sadece tarih yaz, gerisini bana bırak)
Türkçe
5.3K
114
2.2K
428.8K
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
@Professor_A_Ice Psychological manipulation. Now they're playing the victim and making statements. It's a separate issue that they're only now revealing why the Ice-Ion name migration happened. Where's the transparency?
English
0
0
2
197
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
The script is progressing perfectly. Let's see what the next step will be.
Ice Open Network@ice_blockchain

🚨 We want to address a security incident that has recently come to our attention and provide full clarity to the community. On April 15, one individual gained unauthorized access to an identity database server and illegally exported data. We have since received credible information, including direct evidence shared by a well-known member of the community, confirming that parts of this data were further distributed to third parties. The individuals involved were not directly employed by Ice Labs. As mentioned in the past, Ice Labs worked with a third-party service provider that handled part of the operational side of the project, including coordination of development, design, product, and PR resources. The individuals responsible for this incident were part of that service provider’s team. We have identified the individuals involved, and four former collaborators acted together in breaching their contractual confidentiality obligations and illegally sharing sensitive data. We have already initiated formal proceedings, including a complaint filed with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and a criminal complaint with law enforcement authorities, to ensure that all responsible parties are held fully accountable. It is important to clearly state what this incident does and does not impact. User funds are safe. At no point were private keys, access credentials, or any information that could allow unauthorized access to user funds compromised. The affected data includes identity key names, associated public keys, email addresses, and phone numbers used for 2FA. As a precaution, we strongly recommend that all users update their 2FA settings, including both email and phone-based authentication methods. We are treating this matter with the highest level of seriousness and will pursue it to the fullest extent of the law. As we have done before, including successfully defending our name in legal proceedings against Intercontinental Exchange in the United States, we will take all necessary steps to ensure that those responsible are held accountable. At the same time, this situation does not impact the continuation of the project. Development, product rollout, and ecosystem expansion continue without interruption. Our focus remains on building, delivering, and growing the Ice Open Network ecosystem. As an additional measure, tomorrow we will run a migration on Online+ to further increase the security level. During this process, the platform may be temporarily unavailable or experience loading issues. We will continue to provide updates as the situation progresses.

English
3
1
27
2.7K
Isabella
Isabella@ibby_ice·
If $RAVE can reach billions without real utility, imagine what $ION can do with real-world use. Accumulating more $ION this week. I don’t follow noise, I follow conviction.
Isabella tweet media
English
31
12
108
4.3K
Johannes Kripto
Johannes Kripto@johannescrypto·
🚨#SONDAKIKA :17 dolarını 3 milyon dolar'a çeviren yatırımcı dünyanın gündemine oturdu! Bir yatırımcı 2024'un sonunda inanılmaz yükselen, erken vakitlerde 17 dolarlık satın aldığı PNUT'u 3 milyon dolar'a çevirdiği görseli tekrar paylaştı. Bu gönderiyi paylaşmasının ardından kimileri onu yalancılıkla suçlarken kimileri ise tebrik etti. VAY BE😶
Johannes Kripto tweet media
Türkçe
11
2
41
36.1K
Ice Open Network
Ice Open Network@ice_blockchain·
🤔 To the people who rush to point fingers, spread fear, and act like experts without understanding even the basics of blockchain infrastructure: You are not protecting the community. You are poisoning it with noise. Crypto is already a hard industry. It does not need more panic from people doing surface-level analysis, misreading contracts, and turning their own lack of technical understanding into public accusations. This goes beyond our project. If you want to speak with authority in this space, learn how the technology actually works. Learn minting, burning, bridge flows, lock/unlock models, wrapped assets, liquidity mechanics, and on-chain traceability before you start posting like you uncovered some grand conspiracy. Because too often, what gets presented as “exposing the truth” is just ignorance dressed up as confidence. The industry grows when people verify before amplifying. When they study before accusing. When they bring signal instead of noise. So no, we will not stay silent while clueless narratives create unnecessary fear in the community. In crypto, education is not optional. If you are going to be loud, at least be informed.
English
470
111
812
79.4K
Immanuel
Immanuel@___walker·
@IONTechION @ice_blockchain All of you are hypocrites. Hypocrites all of una You guys will be screaming DYOR up and down like person that dog bite to your community. Why is this coming now, Why didn't you DYOR before now or ask questions when people were raising concerns. 😂
English
1
0
1
176
Technical Salman
Technical Salman@Tech_SalmanKhan·
I get your point, bro, but you’re missing the key issue I already raised in my first tweet. My question to @ice_z3us is simple: who owns these $ION Chain wallets? These are clearly Online+ wallets, and 100% you have the ownership data behind them. Stop avoiding the question and provide the actual wallet ownership details instead of deflecting.
English
1
0
1
349
Technical Salman
Technical Salman@Tech_SalmanKhan·
Hello @ice_blockchain , I asked a very simple question: On April 10, 2026, the 72M+ $ION that was sent to the bridge contract — which ION Chain wallet address did it come from? Instead of answering that, you gave the community a basic lecture about the null address — but never provided the actual ION wallet address. 📌 Your reply on my post: x.com/i/status/20448… So I repeated the same direct question: 📌 My reply: x.com/i/status/20448… Again, instead of answering, you diverted with: 👉 “Check Decode Input Data on BSCScan” 📌 Your reply: x.com/i/status/20448… And when the discussion started getting clear, you blocked me from replying. Still, I raised the question again: 📌 My reply: x.com/i/status/20449… This is your idea of “transparency”? So once again, a direct question: What is the ION Chain wallet address that sent those 72M tokens to the bridge contract? I am not asking this as a random user. I am your own beta tester — someone who has analyzed your system in depth. The question is solid. It deserves a solid answer. So far: No wallet address No clear explanation Only diversion and blocking The reality is simple: you are avoiding a direct answer. The community doesn’t need excuses. It needs clear, verifiable on-chain accountability.
Technical Salman tweet media
Technical Salman@Tech_SalmanKhan

Hello @ice_blockchain and @ice_z3us, I need complete transparency regarding this transaction. On April 10, 2026 (07:07:50 PM), a total of 72,889,829.92359359 $ION was bridged from the ION Chain to BSC using the Online+ wallet. After bridging, the tokens were received at: 👉 0x80C7cD223c282CbECCa9fC33E293dA3007C48421 Then transferred to: 👉 0xF34B1F41788B0d10F770f1a6c8D5C2067464122C …and ultimately sold, causing a major drop and damaging the community’s investment. Now here is the key question: The address shown during bridging 👉 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 is clearly the burn address used in cross-chain transfers. So where is the original ION Chain wallet address that held these tokens before the bridge? If the system is truly transparent as claimed, then: Provide the ION Chain wallet address used before bridging Clarify which Online+ account/profile is linked to that wallet Explain the full transaction flow with accountability BSCScan proof 👇 Full details 👇 #tokentxns" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">bscscan.com/address/0x80c7… The community deserves clear answers.

English
35
24
77
6K
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
You're just dragging this out by talking and talking to AI. These addresses you're seeing are all wallets belonging to that son of a bitch Zeus. He converted them all to BSC and sold them. Also, tell the AI this: paste the code from the Ion BSC contract and ask it to explain the bridge issue. You'll get the answer eventually. You're asking the team pointless questions. The guy is a scammer.
English
1
0
0
145
Technical Salman
Technical Salman@Tech_SalmanKhan·
What you are showing is on-chain activity interpretation, not ownership proof. A bridge transfer confirms movement of funds — nothing more. It does NOT prove who controls the wallet, whether it is team, user, or contract automation, or intent behind the transaction. Also, the “null address is a hyperlink-created wallet” claim is technically incorrect. The null address is a standard blockchain burn/mint address, not something generated externally. Multiple wallets showing similar behavior does NOT imply coordination or dumping — that requires proven linkage (funding source, controller relation, or contract association), not just pattern matching. Bottom line: Activity ≠ identity, pattern ≠ proof, correlation ≠ intent. Until wallet ownership is transparently verified, conclusions remain speculation, not evidence.
English
2
0
0
150
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
@Tech_SalmanKhan @ice_blockchain Also, just stop asking that. Below are 15 wallets. They all performed the same action: bridging and selling from Ion to BSC.
Finished tweet media
English
2
0
4
268
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
@Ezedavid1994 Yes, you're right. We were so blinded by the project that we didn't want to believe your past fraud. You can say whatever you want to me, we're bankrupt.
English
1
0
4
342
David Chijioke Eze
David Chijioke Eze@Ezedavid1994·
I remember vividly how you @IONTechION shunned me, threatened to unfollow, mute, and block me when i revealed that Zeus is a scammer. Good y'all have realized you were being fooled by the team you so trusted all along
Finished@IONTechION

You don’t get to gaslight an entire community when the blockchain itself is exposing you. This isn’t “FUD.” This is on-chain evidence. A 10+ year pattern. Multiple projects. Same playbook: – Create legitimacy through shell companies – Attract investors with false narratives – Dump massive supply – Bridge funds across chains – Disappear Sound familiar? Because according to the investigation, over 1.68 BILLION tokens were dumped from insider wallets — wiping out 90%+ of the price. That’s not “market dynamics.” That’s controlled extraction. And the money trail? Fully traceable: ION → BSC → USDC → Ethereum Not theory. Not speculation. Transactions. While people were told “community project,” 15 wallets controlled the supply. While people believed in decentralization, the contract allowed unlimited minting via oracle control. That’s not decentralization. That’s a kill switch. And now? Funds sitting in an Ethereum wallet. Untouched. So no — people asking questions aren’t “clueless.” They’re finally connecting the dots. If you have nothing to hide, address the wallets. Address the dumps. Address the contracts. Because mocking investors after this? That doesn’t make you look confident. It makes everything in that dossier look real.

English
10
1
27
2.6K
Finished
Finished@IONTechION·
You don’t get to gaslight an entire community when the blockchain itself is exposing you. This isn’t “FUD.” This is on-chain evidence. A 10+ year pattern. Multiple projects. Same playbook: – Create legitimacy through shell companies – Attract investors with false narratives – Dump massive supply – Bridge funds across chains – Disappear Sound familiar? Because according to the investigation, over 1.68 BILLION tokens were dumped from insider wallets — wiping out 90%+ of the price. That’s not “market dynamics.” That’s controlled extraction. And the money trail? Fully traceable: ION → BSC → USDC → Ethereum Not theory. Not speculation. Transactions. While people were told “community project,” 15 wallets controlled the supply. While people believed in decentralization, the contract allowed unlimited minting via oracle control. That’s not decentralization. That’s a kill switch. And now? Funds sitting in an Ethereum wallet. Untouched. So no — people asking questions aren’t “clueless.” They’re finally connecting the dots. If you have nothing to hide, address the wallets. Address the dumps. Address the contracts. Because mocking investors after this? That doesn’t make you look confident. It makes everything in that dossier look real.
English
11
5
44
5.3K
PIAOJIXIAN | Official InterLink Ambassador
@ice_blockchain @ice_z3us @robertpreoteasa @mikecostache @AlexandruGrose1 @victor_oancea @VictorOancea4 @MiaAgova @yuulyya_nft @dkay1_ @IONTechION @IONeni21 @Snowboy_Of_ION @mecryptomonk @ICEofTikTok @ICE_NEWS_ Online+'s current Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) design suffers from a critical "security deadlock" issue: If a user loses their original 2FA device and has not saved their backup codes—even if they are able to successfully log in and possess all necessary security credentials (such as their Passkey ID, recovery codes, and email access)—they remain unable to remove their old 2FA configuration or link a new authenticator. When attempting to switch 2FA methods, the system still strictly requires the entry of a verification code generated by that *lost* device, thereby trapping the user in an inescapable dead end. Several months ago, multiple users reported this issue; at that time, the project team acknowledged the problem and stated that they were working on improvements. However, more than six months have passed, yet this issue remains completely unresolved. Given the severity of this security vulnerability, why has the project team been so slow to take action since discovering the problem? We sincerely hope the team will act swiftly to provide the loyal users of Ice Open Network and Online+ with a truly secure and reliable product experience. #ICE #ION #OnlinePlus #IceOpenNetwork #Snow
English
1
0
1
70