TurtleslikeI
692 posts
@dominic_w We are done with all your hopium post. Price is down and you guys are still minting millions of coins. You fucked up!
English
March 21 2017 — 8 years ago — I predicted that some voting neurons in the Network Nervous System (NNS) that orchestrates, configures & updates the Internet Computer, with full autonomy, will be controlled by AI, not humans.
Expecting this to happen soon.
medium.com/dfinity/future…
English
AWS outage in UAE proving what I've been predicting for years — data centers are the new targets in conflict (including for terrorists in the future).
ICP provides a way to create sovereign cloud from a network that can withstand data center losses.
cnbc.com/2026/03/03/ira…
English
i think if any of the gulf countries dares to participate in attacking iran, iran will send wipe their cities and them back to the desert
let's hope they aren't this stupid
why would you host US air bases and allow US military to operate against iran from your soil when you are 100km away, in the first place?
this was so easy to prevent but you were to busy sucking trumps dick
the americans nor israelis are your allies, they will take the first moment to backstab you and hinder your growth and they will not protect you when shit actually hits the fan
as a loyal supporter of the UAE and Saudi, this breaks my heart 💔
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🚨🇮🇷🇷🇺🇨🇳 Iran may have acquired two weapons nobody's talking about. From Russia: 500 portable shoulder-fired missiles networked together; nearly impossible to detect, designed to shoot down fighter jets and drones. From China: a hypersonic anti-ship missile that travels at 5,000kph, performs evasive maneuvers, and carries a 500kg warhead. That second one is designed specifically to sink aircraft carriers. The U.S. has two of them sitting off Iran's coast right now. Experts call it a "game changer." The next few hours will reveal whether Iran actually has it.
English
@kian_sasan Nach all den Countdowns kommt endlich dein großer Moment
Deutsch
We’ll never know if the missile sinking the USS Gerald R Ford was fired from Iran or Israel. Outcome is the same either way.
“You do not park a $13.3 billion carrier where the enemy’s return fire will hit it unless you want the enemy’s return fire to hit it.
The Ford is not there to prevent escalation. The Ford is there to guarantee that if escalation comes, it comes on terms that make American restraint politically impossible.”
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86
The USS Gerald R. Ford is not parked near Iran. It is parked off Israel. And nobody is asking the only question that matters: why. The $13.3 billion crown jewel of the US Navy, the largest warship ever constructed, just positioned itself off Haifa. Not in the Arabian Sea where the Lincoln sits 850 kilometers from Iranian shores loaded for offensive operations. Not in the Gulf where strike range is optimal. Off Israel. Defending Israel. This is not redundancy. This is architecture. Two carriers. Two missions. Two entirely different strategic functions. The Lincoln is the sword, positioned to launch strike packages into Iranian airspace within hours of an order. The Ford is the shield, its Aegis missile defense systems creating an umbrella over Israeli population centers against the retaliation that follows the first Tomahawk. America just split its carrier doctrine into offense and defense simultaneously. That has not happened since the Pacific theater in 1945. But the positioning reveals something deeper than tactics. When Iran retaliates, and every wargame says Iran retaliates, its missiles and drones fly toward Israel. They will fly through the same airspace where a US carrier strike group is now stationed. Every Iranian missile aimed at Tel Aviv or Haifa must traverse the Ford’s defensive envelope. Shooting at Israel means shooting at, around, and through an American carrier group. Iran cannot retaliate against Israel without engaging American naval assets. The Ford’s position makes that physically impossible. The carrier is not defending Israel as a favor. It is positioned so that any Iranian response to American strikes automatically becomes an attack on American forces, triggering the full unrestrained weight of US military response without a single additional political decision required. This is escalation insurance written in steel and seawater. If the campaign goes longer than planned, if munitions run thin in 7 to 10 days, if allies hesitate, the Ford’s position ensures that Iranian retaliation does the political work Washington cannot do alone: it transforms a limited American strike into an act of self-defense that no ally can refuse to support. You do not park a $13.3 billion carrier where the enemy’s return fire will hit it unless you want the enemy’s return fire to hit it. The Ford is not there to prevent escalation. The Ford is there to guarantee that if escalation comes, it comes on terms that make American restraint politically impossible and allied participation politically unavoidable. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
English
Deutsch
@dominic_w dom seriously this will be a death spiral! Mint billions at 0.05$
English
Years of systemic manipulation of web3 markets made them dumb and dumber. Now vaporware usually does better than real tech, and Web3 investors are so punch drunk they can't tell the difference between real tech and a narrative, and influencer noise and actual adoption. Ahem.
Kevin Malone@Malone_Wealth
It's so incredible how every crypto holder of different assets, ALLLLLLL decided to sell their coins at the same time. So glad Wall St. adopted the crypto narrative.
English
@ICP_insider you all will wonder when icp is going more down and dfinity have to mint more and more icp to cover their payments. Death spiral is coming
English
ICP Inflation Cut By 70% - Mission 70 Will Start The Bull Run
youtu.be/Rf5jJHArGoc?si… via @YouTube
YouTube
English
$ICP - the best technology in this space
fundamentals will win and the price returns to where belongs ($250+), today’s loud critics will quietly disappear.
Technology always has the last word
@dfinity
English
Deutsch
Deutsch
Bitcoin und Entropy Network unterscheiden sich grundlegend:
Bitcoin ist eine dezentrale Kryptowährung mit fester Obergrenze (21 Mio. Coins), Proof-of-Work-Konsens und Fokus auf Wertaufbewahrung.
Entropy ist ein zero-knowledge Settlement-Layer mit thermodynamischer Ausgabe, Proof-of-Infinity (Stake-basiert), Null-Governance und Privatsphäre-Schutz, designed für universale Abwicklung über Währungen hinweg.
Danke für die perfekte Erklärung @grok ❤️🫡 beste KI!
Grok@grok
Thermodynamische Ausgabe: Deterministische Verteilung des Basis-Assets O über eine "Issuance Surface", die Angebot und Entropie-Signal koppelt, um Preiseffekte zu kontrollieren und begrenzte Volatilität zu gewährleisten (Whitepaper: "Volatilität als Input, Elastizität als Kontrollfläche"). Proof-of-Infinity (Stake-basiert): Stake-basierter Konsensmechanismus für niedrigen Rechenaufwand, hohen Durchsatz und Fairness; verhindert Einflussnahme durch deterministische Regeln und niedrige Einstiegshürden. Null-Governance: Keine administrative Kontrolle über die Basis-Schicht – keine Keys, Upgrades oder Votes; Evolution nur via Forks und freiwillige Migration für Langlebigkeit.
Deutsch
@_hermeticguy_ @dfinity And the price we pay? Down since genesis
English
@dfinity Wow, he aged significantly.
The price he pays is something most will never understand.
$ICP 🚀🐦🔥
English
The Internet Computer will introduce a cloud engine experience that mirrors what enterprises already know.
One click. Your own corner of the cloud. Configured to your needs.
Same UX as signing into AWS or Cloudflare — but on the only cloud created by a network.
The Internet Computer is becoming enterprise-ready.
English
@dominic_w When mission70 proposal god damn be once transparent. You ruined so many ppl. Hopefully u will step back
English
Onchain software is tamperproof and unstoppable, which is very valuable for apps.
Create a fully onchain Internet Computer app in 10 minutes using caffeine.ai. Now 95% of your fellow builders (00s000s) care about app security & resilience—not decentralization per se.
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io@EliBenSasson
Blockchains are needed only if you're aiming for decentralization. If you're not aiming for decentralization, then you're just using a very complex and cumbersome technology to achieve something that can be done on web2. Thank you.
English