Snappy || DEE🎹
2.6K posts

Snappy || DEE🎹
@IamSnappyD
Hi there, I'm snappy and I'm a music producer and a certified civil engineer 👷🎹🎸🥁🎶🎵 https://t.co/o0dnFWGy0t
Lagos State Katılım Mayıs 2018
1.2K Takip Edilen226 Takipçiler

There’s nothing “okay” about this kind of settings. This is a lot of people’s reality. Social media has made us believe everyone is doing well irl.
Ivory ✪@mide_io
it’s completely okay to start like this🤍
English

@freshonly_ Because his mother in law supported your in built bad behavior ... Why won't she be the best
English

Two weeks after I got married, my mother in law came for a visit. She had missed our wedding because of a flight issue but came later.
She and I vibed instantly because I had not met her before.
We were inside her room one day, when my husband entered and asked where the laundry I did was, he looked frustrated as he asked for a particular cloth which I had washed
I quickly excused myself from to look for the shirt for him and when I went back to the room, my mother in law asked why I allow him talk to me like that
"Enipe?" 😳
"You're doing his laundry and he still can't look for his clothes himself? What are you? A maid?"
She pulled me closer and said, "see ehn, don't let him turn you to his house girl o, since I got married, I've never done his father's laundry, instead he does mine and I brought him up to be that kind of man, if he's not gon be polite and appreciate your efforts by looking for his clothes after you've washed it, let him wash and fold himself" she said
That was the last time I did his laundry in that house and he has been doing mine
Good mothers in law exist
EDOSE✨@iam_biglad1
Unpopular opinion about marriage that would get you in this position???
English

@Certifiedksd @NASA The earth is tiny in the universe and we humans on Earth are just like an electrons in a nucleus it's just like nothing from human eyes
English

@IamSnappyD @NASA We are really small when you think about it 😂
English

Hello, Moon. It’s great to be back.
Here’s a taste of what the Artemis II astronauts photographed during their flight around the Moon. Check out more photos from the mission: nasa.gov/artemis-ii-mul…




English

@Certifiedksd @NASA In-between the the moon and the light there's earth
English


BREAKING: Astronauts currently in space will pass behind the Moon at about 23:47 BST (18:47 EDT) today, the radio and laser signals that allow the back-and-forth communication between the spacecraft and Earth will be blocked by the Moon itself.
For about 40 minutes, the four astronauts will be alone in space

English

@KeruboSk Most of them was taken care from birth with agbo ... Medicinal herbs
English
Snappy || DEE🎹 retweetledi

I don’t know if many can take what I am about to say about Genesis 1.
The creation account was written by ancient Hebrews, and it was a poetic rendition of creation.
It is essentially poetry, and I will show how.
The poetry can be seen in the parallelism in the days of creation.
The author divides creation across two acts: separation and filling.
We will talk about filling later because it is very important.
Day one, what did God do? He separated light from darkness.
Day two? He separated water from sky.
Day three? He separated land from water.
Then, from day four to day six, what did God do? He filled what He separated.
Day four? He filled the separated light and darkness with the sun and moon.
Day five? He filled the separated sky and water with birds and fish.
Day six? He filled the separated ground with animals and man.
Now the parallelism emerges:
Separate day 1, fill day 4.
Separate day 2, fill day 5.
Separate day 3, fill day 6.
This is the poetry. The intention of the author was not chronology but certainty that all came from God.
This is why we do not treat Genesis 1 like a scientific dissertation.
This leads me to the age of the Earth. In Genesis 1, the Bible did not say God created the earth.
It said God fattened it, or filled it.
The word create is Hebrew bara. It means to fatten.
See the root word, its associated words, and how they were used across scripture:
bara — Fatten
beriy — Fat
barah — Choice Meat
barut — Meat
biyr — Fat Place
biyrah — Palace (big place)
All these indicate the earth existed empty and God filled it.
Actually, in verses 1 and 2, the whole of creation was summarized and completed.
So when God separated the light and darkness, and the Bible said DAY ONE, the Hebrew is Yom Echad.
It means one day.
The issue is that the next six days were rendered using second, third, fourth, and so on.
Why not continue with two, three?
Because echad means unity, like a husband and wife becoming one.
So creation was effectively summarily done in that verse.
I pointed that out to show that the creation story did not concern itself with chronology at all.
Secondly, the Hebrews suggest that God filled something that had already existed unfilled and empty.
God filled and separated. So, when did the earth begin in Genesis?
From the Hebraic viewpoint, they do not know.
And that was fine to them. We Greco-Westerners see time as linear, from A to B.
The ancient Hebrews saw it as a cycle. The end of one begins the other.
That is why “In the beginning” in verse 1 is the Hebrew bereshit. It is rendered “In beginning.”
There is no definite article “the.” So no definite beginning, just a beginning.
But God was there in that beginning, and we know God is the cause of all things.
So if modern science comes and says the universe is 14 billion years old, and the Earth is 4.8 billion years old, I would take it.
Genesis never gave us chronology, only origin.
If God decides through modern science what the age of the universe is, we can receive it with joy and give glory to God.
Chris@Kirnan0
@lekan_olayinka1 How old is the universe according to the big bang theory? The earth wasn't formed in 6 days if we follow the evidence provided by the studies surrounding the big bang theory
English

@TheAtomicBagel @forallcurious Darkness is always there from the beginning ... Light is introduce to make a mark ...
English

@forallcurious Darkness doesn't 'travel' anywhere. It's the absence of light.
Saying darkness moves faster than light is like saying the hole in your donut moves when you throw it. Technically sure. Physically meaningless. This has been understood since before Twitter existed.
English

Snappy || DEE🎹 retweetledi

@ElemSunny When you are awaken only you have the full understanding of your words in a unique pattern the other people see it differently from their own perspective
The revelation is scary and addictive when you're awaken
The thirsty of knowing more is so sweet That u only think about God
English

Short answer: not in the strict sense.
If every outcome is already fixed, then “choice” is only an appearance, not a real option. Free will requires genuine alternatives. Predestination, by definition, removes them.
Think of it this way: if everything is strictly predetermined, then no one should be held accountable for anything. Even a murderer could say, “I only did what was already fixed.” That would collapse the whole idea of justice.
Look at everyday logic. If a script is fully written and cannot be changed, the actor is performing, not choosing.
The Bible also leans toward real choice:
Deuteronomy 30:19 — “I have set before you life and death… choose life.”
Joshua 24:15 — “Choose for yourselves whom you will serve.”
James 1:13–15 — people are “drawn away by their own desire,” which points to personal agency.
Yes, God has purpose and foreknowledge, but foreknowledge is not causation. Knowing what someone will choose is not the same as forcing the choice.
God can know the path.
You still have to walk it.
Oku@oku_yungx
Can freewill and predestination coexist?
English

@ElsaSofia__AI Action and reaction positive and negative whatever you can think of is created by God .Darkness exist before light without darkness there won't be light .. it might be we won't even know it's light
Negative effect on human is refers to as evil .. propelled by the society choice
English

@alexboge What if there's no gravity at the back of the moon? .. hope they have a back up plan
English

Some people likely imagine that Artemis II will be firing its rockets to perform its “loop” around the back of the Moon.
But in fact, it won’t. Orion is essentially coasting.
Typically, we imagine that in order to change the course of a spacecraft, the spacecraft itself needs to do something - fire engines, apply thrust, actively steer.
But here, it doesn’t.
As Orion passes behind the Moon, its path is naturally curved by the Moon’s gravity, redirecting it back toward Earth on what’s called a free-return trajectory.
No burn to make the turn.
No propulsion guiding the arc.
Just gravity.
Even more interesting, the trajectory was so precise that planned correction burns weren’t needed. So much for “lost the technology” 😁
And that leads to an unavoidable conclusion:
Without gravity, this maneuver is impossible.
The spacecraft wouldn’t loop the Moon.
It wouldn’t turn at all.
It would continue in a straight line into deep space, never to return.
Gravity is one of the most important forces in the universe - it governs everything from everyday motion here on Earth to the paths of spacecraft and the structure of galaxies.
And here, calculations first worked out decades ago once again bring our travelers safely and efficiently back home.

English
Snappy || DEE🎹 retweetledi

This is actually the opposite when you think about it deeply. There are over 8 billion of us on a tiny rock orbiting one star among 200-400 billion stars in the Milky Way alone, with hundreds of billions of planets scattered across the galaxy, yet, despite all of that, we have found zero evidence of another intelligent civilization anywhere. Not one signal. So when you zoom out and see how vast and empty the universe appears to be, the fact that you are here, alive, conscious, capable of even asking this question, that doesn’t make you irrelevant. It makes you one of the rarest phenomena in the known universe. You’re not small. You’re statistically miraculous.
Another rare fact that makes every single human in existence special (when you zoom out) is this: there will always be more humans who will never exist than humans who ever will. The number of potential humans who will never get a chance at consciousness is almost infinite.
Ewgi@Ssaasquatch
You are one of 7 billion people on a tiny planet orbiting an average star in a random ass galaxy. You my friend are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
English
Snappy || DEE🎹 retweetledi

This view just hits different 🌍
@Astro_Christina and @astro_reid take a moment to look back at Earth as they continue deep into space toward the Moon.


English











