Ignacio Orellano

@Ollie_Vargas_ Aaah to be young...

@GustavoMolvert Jajaj como si la oposición al peronismo no dinamitara al país en cada posibilidad que tienen. Ustedes se arruinan solos con el mamarracho bailando y cantando, dejate de joder

El peronismo agarró la historia de la carne de burro en una localidad perdida, lo magnificó para hacer campaña contra Milei y gracias a eso nos basurean desde Estados Unidos y México diciéndonos come-burros. El peronismo arruinando la imágen nacional desde 1945.

Según lo informado por el Canal 12 de Tel Aviv, información también citada por el diario The Times of Israel, la empresa Navitas Petroleum, de propiedad israelí, iniciará perforaciones petroleras en alta mar cerca de las Malvinas. Estaría estimado que dichas operaciones comiencen en 2028, con una inversión que supera los dos mil millones de dólares La diplomacia argentina lleva tiempo denunciando que ese tipo de “permisos” son unilaterales, otorgados solo por el Reino Unido, algo no autorizado por Naciones Unidas. El consorcio israelí Navitas está asociado a la empresa británica Rockhopper, que tiene prohibido operar en la Argentina desde 2013, cuando sus actividades fueron vedadas La misma sanción tiene Navitas, pero desde 2022, por perforar sin autorización suelo marítimo de nuestra plataforma continental. Si esto llega a concretarse, y si es con la anuencia de Washington, el alineamiento entusiasta de Milei con Trump y su amistad con Israel no estarían ayudando mucho a la hora de poder impedir un desarrollo de explotación petrolera en nuestro suelo marítimo y del que participarían empresas de tres países: Israel, Reino Unido y EE.UU. De esto no habló Milei con Netanyahu

@Nexadmirer @joekent16jan19 Fuck you and all the idiots who think northsmerica or GB had ever fixed something in the middle east. Everything you did in that region created crisis and chaos. Go home motherfuckers.

Notice this piece of shit was all but invisible, until here recently! Now he's all over social media, all over the antisemitic talk shows, badmouthing Trump and badmouthing Israel. He was under investigation for leaking and he needs to be charged. And I would remind everyone that this man's wife got killed by radical Islamists and now he's simping for them. Did you hate your wife that much, @joekent16jan19? Were you glad they killed your wife or something? Because I can't imagine any scenario where I would be simping for the radical Islamists after they killed my wife, unless I just hated her so much that I felt like they did me a favor by doing so. We can't seriously expect this treasonous piece of shit to be loyal to American interests when he can't even be loyal to the memory of his dead wife!

POTUS is laying out two courses of action—a negotiated settlement, or a major escalation. There is a third option, and he should take it: recognize there is no way to force a positive outcome and simply leave. The region is not ours to fix. President Reagan chose this path in Lebanon in ‘84, withdrawing U.S. forces after the Beirut barracks bombing once it became clear the mission’s stabilization goals could not be met, effectively ending direct American military involvement and avoiding a deeper quagmire and long-term entrenchment in the region. A negotiated settlement is unlikely to work or be taken seriously by the Iranians unless we make concessions on the enrichment issue. As we saw yesterday in the SOH, the IRGC is empowered to act without the consent of the civilian leadership, so it’s likely they won’t honor any deal reached. A major escalation will lead to a very destructive outcome for Iran, the region, and eventually the U.S. If POTUS chooses brute force and targets civilian infrastructure, we will create another generation of radicalized Iranians who will rally around the regime and escalate the war by any means possible. If POTUS opts to strike the civilian infrastructure, declare victory, and then leave, we will only further erode our standing in the world, the petrodollar, and eventually our status as the world’s reserve currency holder. We need to get out now. Don’t double down on failure. Avoid the sunken cost trap, leave now, and put America’s interests first.

President Trump is sending more military power to the Middle East as Iran rejects our initial peace offers—setting the escalation trap. We can avoid that trap if we are wise enough not to believe our own hype. Bombing Iranian equipment and killing leaders may produce great hype reels, but if the GWOT taught us anything, it is that tactical success does not equal strategic victory. To avoid a major disaster, we must first define what is truly vital to our national interests and act accordingly—regardless of optics of the daily news cycle. We need the Strait of Hormuz open so oil can flow and stability can return to the energy markets and the Gulf region. These are realistic, achievable goals. They can be reached by significantly reducing our military footprint in the region and lifting sanctions on Iran. We can then tout Iran’s agreement not to build a nuclear weapon as a clear win for the media. The key to avoiding the escalation trap and a disastrous quagmire is restraining Israel by drastically limiting the military aid we provide. Israel cannot sustain this fight without us, and will do everything they can to keep us engaged. We must pursue our own objectives, not theirs. If we try to impose a maximalist outcome on Iran (zero enrichment, etc.) this war will undoubtedly escalate—costing American lives, billions more dollars, and ultimately eroding our global standing. We must learn from our past and recognize when it is time to cut our losses and walk away. In the end, working to restore order will strengthen America far more than any military action ever could.

El único responsable real de la inflación es el Gobierno. Sea éste, el anterior o el que vendrá. Ni los empresarios, ni los comercios.

@Antweegonus Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

Las Malvinas son argentinas Kosovo es serbia Taiwan es china Irlanda hay una sola Palestina libre Zip zap así lo hace un zurdo profesional

@real_lord_miles We will recover the islands and kick your asses every time you try to harm us. Last time you walked with an army on our capital we threw boiling oil. Now we have plenty of bullets. Hope you are first in line to receive them

@ELGAZZ @TicTocTick Bullshit. Give back the Malvinas

When Britain was the global superpower we fathered modern government- laws- infrastructure - we abolished slavery - we bankrupted our country defeating Germany in two world wars - Twice. We peacefully gave independence to all former colonised territories. What have the U.S. achieved with your time as global superpower - other than blowing the shit out of third world countries & throwing global oil & gas distribution into chaos?

100% of all of world’s current geopolitical problems and wars are due to what the British did 60-80 years ago. Every single one of them.

@CWBartholomew80 @TicTocTick Thankful it was the British? Don't be ridiculous. No one should be thanked for being a criminal.

@TicTocTick If the Brits hadn’t done their thing, somebody else would have, and you’d be blaming them. You should be thankful it was the Brits. Current actors should accept responsibility for what’s happening now, and stop deflecting and blaming others.

@jhallwood Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

That’s basically what Argentina did to the natives in that part of South America except they also massacred them, colonised it and are now trying to play third world victim games.

@welsh_pain Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷 culorroto

Day two of the Falklands discourse and I have had to stop myself many times from saying we should n*** Argentina

@SpaceKoala Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

Every country got that one weird beef on a subject. USA -> metric system Brazilians -> Wright Brothers Argentina -> Falklands What are some others?

@DoomerCoomer Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

me: actually i think the british finding the uninhabited falklands and living there isn't colonialism, for once juan pedro gonzales esmarelda gomez de la rosa romero 🇦🇷: you will never be native to the americas

@ProleOtter Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

Jumping on the Falklands Islands discourse. There was no indigenous population on the Falklands when it was first discovered in the 1500s. There were then failed attempts at settling the islands. They could've very well been Argentinian if they managed to keep their settlement-

@rogerlorton Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

When did any of that happen? Britain never recognised the islands as Spanish. And no, Argentine sovereignty was never recognised

@PJ11819211 Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

I think the strangest thing about Argentinian Nationalism is that it is so sheltered and pathetic that it really has no good rhetoric persuasion to it. Argentinians post a bunch photos and claim that they have right to conquest because "muh half a dozen Spanish settlers".

@falklands_utd Malvinas Argentinas 🇦🇷

🇬🇧