Igor Krein

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates You are hopeless. All your memes about beliefs in something with no reason, you should apply to yourself. I don't exorcise beliefs, can't help you here.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Quindi hanno raccomandato e persino obbligato le persone a somministrarsi una terapia genica obsoleta? Per andare a scuola. Per andare a lavorare. Per andare a giocare a calcetto con gli amici

Researchers at Stanford University have elucidated a mechanism behind the occurrence of myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in young males. Analysis of blood samples from vaccinated individuals revealed elevated levels of two cytokines—CXCL10 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)—in those who developed post-vaccination myocarditis. These signaling proteins initiate a two-step inflammatory cascade: CXCL10, primarily produced by macrophages in response to the vaccine, recruits T cells that release IFN-γ, which in turn attracts aggressive immune cells (such as neutrophils and macrophages) to the heart, leading to tissue damage. In preclinical models (including mice and human cardiac tissue), neutralizing CXCL10 and IFN-γ significantly reduced cardiac injury and immune cell infiltration without impairing the vaccine's overall immunogenicity. Additionally, pretreatment with genistein—a soy-derived anti-inflammatory compound—attenuated the cytokine surge and mitigated heart damage in these models. Vaccine-associated myocarditis typically presents with symptoms like chest pain, shortness of breath, and palpitations shortly after the second dose and remains exceedingly rare. Importantly, SARS-CoV-2 infection itself poses a substantially higher risk of myocarditis—along with severe multisystem complications—reinforcing that the benefits of mRNA vaccination far exceed the risks. Statistics report 1 case of myocarditis in 9,000–25,000 doses for the highest-risk groups, adolescent and young adult males, particularly after the second dose. Rates were much lower in females, older adults, and after first or booster doses. For context, myocarditis risk from actual COVID-19 infection was substantially higher—often 10 times or more in comparable age groups. [Cao, X., Manhas, A., Chen, Y.-I., et al. (2025). Inhibition of CXCL10 and IFN-γ ameliorates myocarditis in preclinical models of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Science Translational Medicine. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adq0143]

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates So prove me you are not a chimp and can track back these screenshots and produce a valid link and everything. I ain't gonna do your job for you, sorry.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Chiunque, persino uno scimpanzé, potrebbe risalire ai papers e analisi di laboratorio. Ma purtroppo tu non sei al livello. Mi dispiace non perdo tempo con gli stupidi.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates So, no evidence from you. As expected.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Il tuo problema è che si tratta di una terapia genica sperimentale, senza consenso informato, contaminata 627 volte il limite per il rischio oncogenetico OMS, inefficace, che favorisce il Covid, dannosa e ... non ha salvato nemmeno una vita ma ha causato milioni di morti.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates One doesn't need to be a fortune teller to "predict" something that already happened. A tiny hint: at the time of the original trials, there were no Delta and Omicron yet.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates No non sono un indovino mi servono i dati. E li ho avuti.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Current COVID variants are pretty mild, and I am not in the high risk group to get another shot of the vaccine. Time goes by, things change, and only your intelligence remains on the same level it has reached many years ago, soon after you were taught to write.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Allora continua fino alla 99esima variante con 99 dosi e tira la monetina. Io non ti seguo siccome sono intelligente.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates No, here we can see some screenshots taken from an unknown source. Anyone is able to create an Excel table, fill it with whatever numbers he wants and then make a screenshot. Sorry, not valid.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Ad esempio qui si può vedere che la terapia genica favorisce il COVID , favorisce le miocarditi, ed è contaminata 627 volte il limite di sicurezza oncogenstico e adulterata.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Your problems. You want to prove something - you bring proper evidence. This is your burden. If you don't bring evidence, your claims are considered false. This is the way things work. Welcome to the real world.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Sei analfabeta? Io non sono il tuo segretario e non mi paghi abbastanza e lì ci sono una dozzina di riferimenti.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Yes, original studies did show this. But not for Delta and Omicron. You never guess why, I bet.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Il sacro vax è efficace al 90%. NONOSTANTE gli studi non possano dircelo.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Mentally retarded is someone who expects trials to establish whether the vaccine is good against a virus that doesn't exist yet.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Fai 6 dosi e tira la monetina allora. Ritardato mentale.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Dude, if you want me to waste my time on something, waste your own time first. I am not going to do your job for you. I need proper links, clickable ones, comprehend? And also - quote from them that allegedly support your claims.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates E anche oggi capisci domani. Alla solita ora fatti sentire per dirmi che ancora non hai capito.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates "So you can't prove anything about Delta and Omicron" With original trials? No. You can't, too. Because original trials were not about Delta and/or Omicron.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Quindi non puoi dimostrare nulla su Delta e Omicron. E neanche sull'incidenza delle miocarditi vaccinali visto che il trial è stato chiuso non appena ottenuta l'autorizzazione. Ma ora sappiamo che ha favorito il Covid e causato più morti del virus.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Nope, these are not new arguments, these are taken out of context screenshots (at least some of them you have already brought). Bring links to studies, preferrably with relevant quotes. And - one by one, don't spam me.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Ragazzino questi sono i dati. Di una terapia genica contaminata inefficace e iatrogena. Ha fatto qualche milione di morti.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Same lame claims, same lame screenshots as "arguments" that "back up" these claims. We were through this not once and not twice. You learned nothing. You have no new arguments, even imaginary ones. Wake me up when this changed. Till then -

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates La terapia genica (senza consenso informato) è stata inefficace, ha favorito il covid ed è stata dannosa. Su questo ormai siamo sicuri. Inoltre è contaminata 627 volte il limite di sicurezza per il rischio integrazione e adulterata.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Clinical trials were not supposed to show any of these things. They were supposed to show the efficacy against infection. Which they did. That you believe they had to do smth else - is, again, your problem.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates I trials non hanno dimostrato che il sacro vax riduca la malattia grave, i ricoveri e le morti. Nessun RCT su Delta e Omicron. I dati osservazionali non ci possono essere utili. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/je…

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates The efficacy of the vaccine was proved during the trials. Now, we have a number of studies of the real-world data which shows the vaccination campaign did help to fight the virus. That you believe the vaccine should have stopped the virus immediately - is your own problem.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Mi domando come farai a dimostrare che il sacro vax è stato sicuro ed efficace durante i 3 anni di campagna vaccinale obbligatoria. Non puoi.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates So, now it "ifs", a progress. We were talking about the danger from the virus and about the efficacy of the vaccines. If the virus is artificial it is relevant to whether somebody has to pay for this, but is completely irrelevant to the topic of our discussion.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Sei in ritardo oggi, troll. Se il virus era Artificiale qualcuno dovrà pagare per i morti. Se i protocolli covid hanno causato morti qualcuno dovrà pagare. Se la terapia genica inefficace e iatrogena ha causato morti qualcuno dovrà pagare. Questo è il mondo reale.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates I see... You need a new tinfoil hat, you've outgrown this one.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Perché si tratta di milioni di morti con dolo. Allo stesso modo dei morti causati dai protocolli sbagliati. Allo stesso modo dei morti causati da una terapia genica obbligatoria, inefficace e iatrogena.

@marco_borrano @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Nope. Again, you wouldn't have said this if you read Logic for Dummies - over and over again till your brain finally clicks and starts functioning.

@IgorKrein @HomeWorldof @nithgenga @watkins_japan @Rainmaker1973 @BillGates Quindi siamo finalmente d'accordo che si tratta di una terapia genica inefficace.

@eh_verdade_sim @mtaibbi @TKTX2022 The explanation is simple: the events don't match the definition of genocide. For genocide, an intent (to destroy group etc.) is required. It's difficult to prove intent, in the first place. But there are facts that just don't correlate with the hypothesis of intent.

@mtaibbi @TKTX2022 It would demonstrate honesty and courage to do so. Character. If you don’t think it’s genocide, at least have the character to say so and the courage to explain why. How would you describe what Israel is doing? The majority of legal experts say it’s genocide.

Refusing to be forced to use the word “genocide” when you don’t think it’s accurate is, though.

@griercoppins @mtaibbi Intl Court? Really? When?

@mtaibbi Crazy who your new friends are out here Matt. Viewing comments. But Greenwald is not confused. Hedges... not confused. Blumenthal...not confused. Mate... not confused. Finkelstein... not confused. 125 countries... not confused. International Court...not confused. Genocide.