Importable Napkins
293 posts

Importable Napkins
@Import_napkin
i don't necessarily agree with everyone i follow but they can be interesting nonetheless
Katılım Eylül 2025
58 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler

@GibsTweets_KF @MikeyNohMore "if you look at something that looks like a child you'd see in anime but in sexual positions and think of a sexualized child you are a pedophile" i can't with these piece of shit morons. their loli macros with a shit eating grins don't make them look any less of a pedophile.
English

@MikeyNohMore DevilDolphin69 is likely a rage bait account. He attempted to falsely accuse me of being a pedophile because I dare say comparing lolisho and video games as the same thing is a false equivalency.
Their irresponsible behavior is why more people are disliking them and their fetish

English

This interaction is a good example of the problem with current weebs. They're noticeably more neurotic, aggro, and eager to inject politics into shit compared to older weebs. They can't even argue over anime without crashing out and blocking you.
It's just anime, son. Calm down.

Mikey NohMore@MikeyNohMore
Anime Twitter has always been ass, but it was never quite this level of STANK up until recently.
English

@ToastedCheese18 @Michaeldudufudu i can't say much for the gays and transgenders that have severely irreversible mental traits either from testosterone exposure at prenatal development or trauma, other than may God help them.
English

@ToastedCheese18 @Michaeldudufudu quite a lot of gays and transgenders identify as such because they don't have much personality traits or think it's cool and rebellious to be one or are just porn addicted (especially transgenders). in a decade or so, they typically revert back, or go celibate entirely. 1/2
English

@WolStar16 @Michaeldudufudu Again, mostly. Also your avatar looks like Sam from Sam and Max's trans bisexual cousin from Atlanta.
English

@Import_napkin @Michaeldudufudu I have fat in feminine places but I'm AMAB
English

@CaiquedExu @caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting lolis are drawings of children and your semantic loops won't change that.
English

@Import_napkin @caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting Children are not a "template" you sick disgusting pedophile.
Yes, you need therapy, you are deranged.
Get help fast, before you confuse actual children and animals with cartoons and gog knows what an insane person like you can do with them.
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting I'm pointing out that loli is eroticizing the prepubescent child template (Tanner 1 traits + innocence), just like bestiality art eroticizes the animal template even when it's not a real animal.
You've twisted every point into strawman and tell ME to seek therapy. GTFO.
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting When you insist in comparing then to objects, you are.
If by "bestiality art" you mean furry, that's literally the same.
Animals are living creatures, not fantasy hybrids of humans and animals.
Stop with the semantics, alright. Seek therapy.
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting nobody is treating children as objects, you're deflecting my argument and telling me they're not real kids, like how the animal in the bestiality art is not a real animal technically. we all know this. i'm done with the semantic loops.
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting Children are not a concept.
Stop treating children as objects.
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting yes, the traits CAN be seen with adults but the combination of them (tanner stage 1) is the exact development stage before puberty starts. the drawing isn't a literal child but the concept of it, like how bestiality art is the concept of a human fucking an animal.
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting Because the traits that you cling so much, the things that are not exclusive to children, are observable in real adults.
Mimicking an age is not being that age.
You can't be with a child and claim she looks like an adult.
Again, stop using the 500 years excuse.
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting you're comparing loli to real adults to say 'different,' and to real children to say 'different', but it still closely mimics the prepubescent stage that defines the pedophilic stimulus category. the 'actually ancient' caption doesn't change the visual pattern being sexualized.
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting When you compare a loli with a real life human adult, sure. They're different.
But so are they if you try to compare them with a real life child.
A loli IS a petite anime character.
And these traits in real life are not unique to children.
English

@caiquedeexu @CreativeBod1 @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting "just cause some pedo thoughts in your head, doesn't make them pedo." but acting on them does. "appreciating"/jacking off to lolis is very close to it. idk why you keep dodging around shi and tell "me" to get therapy. i think your subcon is trying to talk to you by talking to me.
English

@Import_napkin @CreativeBod1 @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting We don't need to go as far as pituitary dwarfism to find bodies with these traits.
Humans, without mutations and genetic deformities, comes in all sizes and measures.
Just because some activate pedophilic thoughts in your head, doesn't make them inherently pedophilic.
Get therapy
English

@CreativeBod1 @caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting i said "mutation" not nonexistence, it's not normal like how having one leg is not normal.
English

@Import_napkin @caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting Except rarity is not equal to nonexistence.
Just because you yourself don't see it doesnt mean it isnt there.
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting "not unique to kids so it has nothing to do with kids." very smart there.
the specific cluster of flat chest + tiny frame + no adult curves + childish innocence on a character is very much the prepubescent body scheme. that's why loli is distinct from a petite adult.
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting None of these traits you listed are unique to prepubescence.
English

@CreativeBod1 @caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting said adults who completely retain their childhood are extremely rare to the point that by that logic, albino can be considered "just a different skin tone" and not a mutation
English

@Import_napkin @caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting I mean, given how there are adults that can have said childlike looks...Do you forget that not everyone's genetics are the same?
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting prepubescent can be also for adults now i guess
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting Because these traits could also be displayed on adults.
The appeal is the character, it's the whole package.
Just look at how most lolicons are dedicated to characters with lore, instead of characters they don't know or generic pin ups made for the sake of it.
English

@caiquedeexu @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting because they are. you try to get around this factoid but all it does it makes you look more of a pedophile wannabe.
English

@Import_napkin @Chaosxx227 @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting No I don't.
Why do lolis make you think of them?
English

@Chaosxx227 @caiquedeexu @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting but they're not. how fun. your community fights for the flat/tiny versions because that's the appeal and you refuse to acknowledge the connections to children.
English

@Chaosxx227 @caiquedeexu @unapproved_fox @sntntmcrwv @DelusionPosting i wouldn't just call that "fun stylization"; if anything it proves my point on using children as a base for sexual arousal.
if it was just abstract 'cute' with no youth link, mature adult bodies with the same '500-year-old' backstory would be the default. (2/?)
English





