InSalón Hair&MakeUp

@talomago Los musulmanes?

Los judíos crían a sus hijos para que se conviertan en terroristas.

En 1995, una enfermera infringió las normas del hospital para colocar a un recién nacido en la incubadora de su hermana gemela. No se esperaba que el bebé sobreviviera. Kyrie y Brielle Jackson nacieron 12 semanas antes de lo previsto en un hospital de Estados Unidos. Cada una pesó aproximadamente un kilo. Fueron colocadas en incubadoras separadas, práctica habitual para prevenir infecciones. Kyrie recuperó fuerzas. Brielle no. Tres semanas después de nacer, Brielle entró en estado crítico. Su nivel de oxígeno bajó. Su ritmo cardíaco se disparó. Su piel se tornó azul grisácea. La enfermera Gayle Kasparian lo intentó todo. La abrazó. Hizo que su padre la abrazara. La envolvió en una manta. Nada funcionó. Kasparian recordó haber oído hablar de una práctica utilizada en algunas partes de Europa, pero nunca probada en hospitales estadounidenses. Colocó a Brielle en la incubadora de Kyrie. Su padre describió lo que sucedió después: “Se acurrucó junto a Kyrie y estaba perfectamente bien. Fue inmediato. Fue absolutamente inmediato”. En cuestión de minutos, los niveles de oxígeno de Brielle alcanzaron su punto máximo desde su nacimiento. Mientras dormía, Kyrie extendió su brazo izquierdo sobre el cuerpo de su hermana y la abrazó. El fotógrafo Chris Christo capturó el momento. La imagen dio la vuelta al mundo y se conoció como «El abrazo salvador». Hospitales de varios países comenzaron a juntar a gemelos prematuros, una práctica que había sido rechazada durante décadas. Ambas niñas regresaron a casa sanas. Ahora tienen 30 años.

@JPMartinezBlog Saludos de regreso!

@InSalonmx Saludos!

«Los dispensacionalistas no predican a Cristo. Predican a Israel.» No es verdad. Puedes visitar cualquier iglesia local dispensacional, misión o grupo de estudio, y en su enorme mayoría —porque como en todo puede haber sus excepciones— vas a escuchar enseñanza práctica de toda clase de asuntos que la Biblia trata. Personalmente, llevo seis meses enseñando sobre espiritualidad cristiana. Y el año pasado enseñé capítulo a capítulo el evangelio de Juan. Me ocupé de enseñar premilenialismo durante tres meses. Pero fue específicamente por el orden de temas en el plan educativo de mi ministerio. El tema de Israel se trata cuando es pertinente, según los textos y los temas tratados, como todos los demás temas que se tocan en la iglesia cristiana. Eso de que «los dispensacionalistas no predican a Cristo, predican a Israel» es un muñecazo de paja: reduce la realidad de la espiritualidad cristiana a lo que miran en internet. No se salen de esta burbuja. Y creen que lo que miran aquí es todo lo que existe. Pero la vida real de la iglesia es mucho más. Canales en Internet que sean monotemáticos hay muchos. Si un pastor abre un canal sobre escatología, y solo publica sobre eso, ello no significa que todo se trate de lo mismo en su ministerio. Simplemente se eligió tratar un tema de forma continua en un espacio público. Hitchcock y Woods, por ejemplo, no dejan de hablar de los últimos tiempos en internet. Pero como ministros tratan muchos asuntos en sus congregaciones. De otro modo, sería un pastorado fallido. Porque es deber de los pastores «predicar todo el consejo de Dios» (Hch. 20:27). Pero si quieres ver eso, debes ir a sus iglesias, y no juzgar las cosas como si internet agotara toda la realidad. Así que la frase, «los dispensacionalistas no predican a Cristo, predican a Israel», es una forma de descalificar la espiritualidad cristiana de los hermanos dispensacionales, y hacerles ver como fanáticos e ignorantes. Nada que ver.

IMPERDIBLE, HERMOSO Y MUUUY ESPERANZADOR! YEHOSHÚA haga resplandecer su rostro sobre tí, cuando lo veas y otorgue llamado en el profundo entendimiento y comprensión de este mensaje! Shalom! Yesha’yahu Isaías (parte 109) cap 61A youtube.com/live/2yt-BjdVB… vía @YouTube

@elivillalpando A mi no me daban permiso

Leonardo DiCaprio en “Romeo & Juliet” 🤤

@KurvaBlyat71898 @DavidFischer Please! Remember the dressed language! Enoch and Eliyah?? Or Moses and Eliyah??? And… … where did you find out in the Scrptures?

@DavidFischer False. The AntiChrist hasn't even killed Enoch and Elijah yet. So why would Jesus come soon? Makes no sense. Use logic, bro.

I grew up in the Jewish faith, but after studying the scriptures, I was convinced that Jesus is the true Messiah, son of the living God and the only way to spend eternity with Him. He died, rose again, and is coming again soon!

Parece ser que el objetivo de la guerra es abrir el estrecho de Ormuz, un estrecho que estaba abierto antes de que comenzara la guerra.

Billions of graphene oxide nanoparticles have been found inside the COVID shots. Aaand the "conspiracy theorists" were right yet again.

@EliAfriatISR But Not Sionist!

QUICK REMINDER: JESUS WAS JEWISH.

@SHolmes66305 x.com/insalonmx/stat…

When someone says, “The Jews rejected Jesus, so God rejected them,” this is my response: “Many believed in His name…” — John 2:23 “Many of the people believed in Him…” — John 7:31 “As He spoke these things, many came to believe in Him” — John 8:30 “Many of the Jews… believed in Him” — John 11:45 “Many even of the authorities believed in Him…” — John 12:42 Not a few. Not a fringe. Many… Jews. All four Gospels record the triumphal entry—roads lined with Jews openly declaring Him as Messiah: “Hosanna! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord, even the King of Israel!” — John 12:13 That’s not rejection, that’s recognition. Then Acts: 3,000 Jews believe after Peter’s first sermon and he tells them: “The promise is for you and your children…” — Acts 2:39 Still speaking to Israel. Then 5,000 more: “The number of the men came to be about five thousand” — Acts 4:4 Then it keeps growing: “Multitudes of men and women were constantly added…” — Acts 5:14 “A great many of the priests were becoming obedient to the faith” — Acts 6:7 Yes, even Jewish priests. And later: “You see… how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed.” — Acts 21:20 Thousands. Not rejecting, responding. The apostles themselves were Jews, the first among the remnant of Israel to believe Jesus was the Messiah. Paul says it plainly: “Has God rejected His people? May it never be! For I too am an Israelite…” — Romans 11:1 So the claim that “the Jews rejected Jesus, therefore God rejected them” is not simply wrong, it is actually built on a false premise that the Scriptures themselves do not support. It exposes the influence of imposed Gentile frameworks and familiar phrases that shape how people come to believe things about the Bible that the Bible itself does not say. This is what I call the gentile Christian matrix… until you unplug you don’t know you’re in it. You actually think you read the Bible correctly when you’re making grave errors like assigning the entire nation of Israel in Jesus’ day the blanket label of unbelief.

@Daniel_Vaden Interesting!

Why did the ancient Sumerians worship Enlil, the “great bull”? Because the Sun had its vernal equinox in the constellation Taurus (Bull) in the Pre-Flood era. The sun’s location during the equinox determined the “age”, which signified the disposition of the world at the time. The ancients made a practice of worshipping the figures in the heavens, strictly prohibited by Deuteronomy 4:19. The Israelites struggled to relinquish their worship of heavenly bodies, but YHWH sanctifies His people through His Torah, which trains them in truth and righteousness. Now ask what age came right after Taurus… Aries. The Lamb / Ram. During this age, YHWH promised deliverance to Abraham through a coming lamb… a ram caught in the thicket… who would carry away the sins of the Cosmos. YHWH’s heavenly clock tells a story… but it’s never to be worshipped.

@EkklesiaMind @Daniel_Vaden What does te text says? YHWH hates that. Piriod. Bye

It’s not “localized deviation,” that doesn’t match the scale of the data. Archaeology shows broad, repeated patterns: Kuntillet Ajrud and Khirbet el-Qom link Yahweh with Asherah in different regions. Judah pillar figurines are found widely across households, not isolated sites. Elephantine shows diaspora Jews practicing alongside other deities. Scholarly consensus reflects this pattern: Mark S. Smith: early Israelite religion was not exclusive monotheism. William Dever: “the majority of Israelites were not monotheists.” Karel van der Toorn: household religion was widely syncretistic. This isn’t a modern reinterpretation, it’s multiple independent lines converging on the same conclusion: widespread non-monotheistic practice among Israelites.

This may shock you to hear but… The Jews did not reject Yeshua! THOUSANDS believed and followed Him. They welcomed him with palm branches. Even authorities and priests. It was a portion of Jewish leadership that rejected Him, and they coordinated with the Romans to have Him executed. God did not reject Israel. He did not take away their covenant status. He took the keys to the kingdom (religious authority) and gave them to the faithful Jews - the apostles and their associates. And he told them to flee Jerusalem for the wrath that is coming. To this day, non-Messianic Jews are subject to a refining process to bring as many of them to faith in Yeshua as possible, but also to provoke them to jealousy by the faithful walk of those who DO follow the Jewish Messiah Yeshua… including the myriads from the nations who wouldn’t consider themselves to be “Jewish”. But Christians need to ask themselves this question: Am I following the Yeshua of the Bible who kept and taught all of Torah? Or am I following a Greco-Romanized counterfeit version of the faith built upon the scaffolding of Roman Catholicism, empowered by the Roman empirical sword throughout the course of the Middle Ages? Is modern Christianity coordinating with the Romans once again (just like the hypocritical Jewish elite in the first century) to put away the true Messiah and beg for Barabbas?

@EkklesiaMind @Daniel_Vaden That’s an ad hominem fallacy. When you can’t address the argument, you attack the person. It’s what people resort to when they’ve run out of actual arguments. Thanks for making that clear. 👏👏👏👏👏

@InSalonmx @Daniel_Vaden No you're just a RETARD

@EkklesiaMind @Daniel_Vaden I have studied this material for years, and I will not continue engaging in discussions framed this way. It is a waste of time.

@EkklesiaMind @Daniel_Vaden In short, this is not rigorous scholarship—it is projection. You are not deriving conclusions from the data; you are filtering the data through a pre-existing narrative.