First, LGBTQ identity cannot be used to justify or excuse inappropriate physical contact. Sexual orientation is part of a person’s identity, but it is unrelated to behavioral boundaries. In any public or professional setting, physical interaction must always be based on clear consent and established rules, not justified by identity, familiarity, or personal relationships.
Second, framing public criticism as “fans being jealous” is a distortion of the issue and a deflection from the core point. The focus of public concern has never been competition or emotional conflict, but whether basic professional standards and boundaries were respected. Reducing legitimate concerns to “jealousy” is a way of avoiding accountability.
At its core, this issue is not about identity labels or public sentiment, but about a fundamental principle:
all interactions must be based on respect for boundaries and clear consent.
When this principle is ignored or blurred, public concern is both reasonable and necessary.
@Inmyremember I have no intention of questioning or denying whether the two of them are close or whether they respect each other. That said, I don’t think that means everything should be understood or accepted. I simply believe that his behavior in public was inappropriate.
Por duas vezes, a Namtan sofreu assédio durante esse programa pelo mesmo apresentador. Ele tocou nela diversas vezes na perna, chegando a puxá-la e tentar abraçá-la. Em todas essas investidas, Namtan se mostrou claramente incomodada, inclusive se afastando dele. @GMMTV , exigimos que vocês tomem uma atitude e protejam suas artistas.
ASSÉDIO É CRIME.
#ProtectNamtan#GirlRulesSeriesEP6
Innocent children as young as 8 years old were killed in an attack on a civilian home in Cambodia. We are broken into millions of pieces by this and Cambodia is now a full-fledged war criminal.
RIP. Namkhong Buntang
#cambodiaopnedfire
#ไทยกัมพูชา
#Cambodia